Influence of modeling agents on the surface properties of an esthetic nano-hybrid composite

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different modeling agents on the surface microhardness (Vickers hardness number; VHN), roughness (Ra), and color change (ΔE) of a nano-hybrid composite with or without exposure to discoloration by coffee. Materials and Methods Sixty-four cylinder-shaped nano-hybrid composite specimens were prepared using a Teflon mold. The specimens' surfaces were prepared according to the following groups: group 1, no modeling agent; group 2, Modeling Liquid; group 3, a universal adhesive (G-Premio Bond); and group 4, the first step of a 2-step self-adhesive system (OptiBond XTR). Specimens were randomly allocated into 2 groups (n = 8) according to the storage medium (distilled water or coffee). VHN, Ra, and ΔE were measured at 24 hours, 1 week, and 6 weeks. The Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons was used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05). Results Storage time did not influence the VHN of the nano-hybrid composite in any group (p > 0.05). OptiBond XTR Primer application affected the VHN negatively in all investigated storage medium and time conditions (p < 0.05). Modeling Liquid application yielded improved Ra values for the specimens stored in coffee at each time point (p < 0.05). Modeling Liquid application was associated with the lowest ΔE values in all investigated storage medium and time conditions (p < 0.05). Conclusion Different types of modeling agents could affect the surface properties and discoloration of nano-hybrid composites.

[1]  A. Faria-E-Silva,et al.  Effects of adhesive used as modeling liquid on the stability of the color and opacity of composites , 2018, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[2]  M. Cenci,et al.  Translucency and color stability of resin composite and dental adhesives as modeling liquids - A one-year evaluation. , 2017, Brazilian oral research.

[3]  S. Parker,et al.  The effect of instrument lubricant on the diametral tensile strength and water uptake of posterior composite restorative material. , 2017, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  M. Cenci,et al.  Effects of modeling liquid/resin and polishing on the color change of resin composite. , 2016, Brazilian oral research.

[5]  E. Piva,et al.  Use of dental adhesives as modeler liquid of resin composites. , 2016, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[6]  E. Piva,et al.  Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, Journal of dentistry.

[7]  D. Dudea,et al.  Influence of opacity on the color stability of a nanocomposite , 2015, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[8]  M. Demirci,et al.  The effect of a modeling resin and thermocycling on the surface hardness, roughness, and color of different resin composites. , 2013, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[9]  F. PIRES-DE-SOUZA,et al.  Effect of brushing and accelerated ageing on color stability and surface roughness of composites. , 2013, Journal of dentistry.

[10]  R. Mondelli,et al.  Clinical strategies for esthetic excellence in anterior tooth restorations: understanding color and composite resin selection , 2012, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[11]  B. Biradar,et al.  Evaluation of the Effect of Water on Three Different Light Cured Composite Restorative Materials Stored in Water: An In Vitro Study , 2012, International journal of dentistry.

[12]  A. Furuse,et al.  A direct composite resin stratification technique for restoration of the smile. , 2011, Quintessence international.

[13]  Jack L Ferracane,et al.  Resin composite--state of the art. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  P. H. dos Santos,et al.  Effect of artificial aging on the roughness and microhardness of sealed composites. , 2010, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[15]  Ana Yebra,et al.  Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics. , 2010, Journal of dentistry.

[16]  E. Sampaio,et al.  Effect of a glaze/composite sealant on the 3-D surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. , 2009, Operative dentistry.

[17]  D. C. Barcellos,et al.  Effects of resinous monomers used in restorative dental modeling on the cohesive strength of composite resin. , 2008, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[18]  A. Misra,et al.  Relationship of solvent to the photopolymerization process, properties, and structure in model dentin adhesives. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[19]  W. Dunn,et al.  Effect of alcohol and unfilled resin in the incremental buildup of resin composite. , 2007, Quintessence international.

[20]  J. Perdigão,et al.  Effect of instrument lubricant on the cohesive strength of a hybrid resin composite. , 2006, Quintessence international.

[21]  R. Lowe Using BisCover surface sealant/polish on direct and indirect composite and bisacrylic provisional restorations. , 2004, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[22]  M. Bolla,et al.  Effect of surface penetrating sealant on surface texture and microhardness of composite resins. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[23]  M. Quirynen,et al.  The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.