Robust allocation of weighted dependency links in cyber–physical networks

Interdependent network models are often used to show how one network has an effect on another network through dependencies. In this paper, we propose a novel interdependent network model which consists of two individual networks with unequal numbers of nodes and one-to-multiple weighted dependency links between the two networks. Based on realistic assumptions, this model differs from previous works that considered equal numbers of nodes in the two networks and identical dependency links. We formulate an optimization problem to allocate dependency links using least resources. This novel model enhances the practicability of traditional cyber–physical system structures, but it makes the dependency link deployment problem more complex and the optimization problem cannot be solved in large networks. To overcome this problem, we propose a new algorithm based on a revised network flow method. Extensive simulations on random networks and real networks show that our deployment method produces topologies that are more robust than the ones obtained by other deployment techniques. Results indicate that our algorithm is efficient and cost-effective in designing robust interdependent networks, and our deployment method is suitable for networks of any size.

[1]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  The robustness of interdependent clustered networks , 2012, ArXiv.

[2]  H. Stanley,et al.  Networks formed from interdependent networks , 2011, Nature Physics.

[3]  S. Havlin,et al.  Robustness of a network formed by n interdependent networks with a one-to-one correspondence of dependent nodes. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks , 2009, Nature.

[5]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Exact Coupling Threshold for Structural Transition in Interconnected Networks , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Baharan Mirzasoleiman,et al.  Cascaded failures in weighted networks. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Robustness of interdependent networks under targeted attack , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  Jian-Wei Wang,et al.  Robustness of the western United States power grid under edge attack strategies due to cascading failures , 2011 .

[9]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Assortativity Decreases the Robustness of Interdependent Networks , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[11]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Cascade of failures in coupled network systems with multiple support-dependent relations , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  Quanyan Zhu,et al.  Networked cyber-physical systems: Interdependence, resilience and information exchange , 2013, 2013 51st Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[13]  Ravindra K. Ahuja,et al.  Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications , 1993 .

[14]  Shimon Even,et al.  Graph Algorithms , 1979 .

[15]  Junshan Zhang,et al.  Optimal Allocation of Interconnecting Links in Cyber-Physical Systems: Interdependence, Cascading Failures, and Robustness , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[16]  Fei Tan,et al.  Cascading failures of loads in interconnected networks under intentional attack , 2013 .

[17]  Chen Jiang,et al.  Robustness of interdependent networks with different link patterns against cascading failures , 2014 .

[18]  S. Havlin,et al.  Interdependent networks: reducing the coupling strength leads to a change from a first to second order percolation transition. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[19]  A. Arenas,et al.  Abrupt transition in the structural formation of interconnected networks , 2013, Nature Physics.

[20]  B. Bollobás The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[21]  S. Buldyrev,et al.  Interdependent networks with identical degrees of mutually dependent nodes. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Huijuan Wang,et al.  Algebraic Connectivity of Interdependent Networks , 2014 .

[23]  Caterina M. Scoglio,et al.  Optimizing algebraic connectivity by edge rewiring , 2013, Appl. Math. Comput..

[24]  Sakshi Pahwa,et al.  Optimal intentional islanding to enhance the robustness of power grid networks , 2013 .

[25]  Matthew Roughan,et al.  The Internet Topology Zoo , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[26]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[27]  Filippo Radicchi,et al.  Driving Interconnected Networks to Supercriticality , 2013, 1311.7031.

[28]  Donald E. Knuth,et al.  The Art of Computer Programming: Volume 3: Sorting and Searching , 1998 .

[29]  J. S. Andrade,et al.  Avoiding catastrophic failure in correlated networks of networks , 2014, Nature Physics.

[30]  Roberta Terruggia,et al.  Unavailability of critical SCADA communication links interconnecting a power grid and a Telco network , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[31]  Seth Bullock,et al.  Interdependent networks: vulnerability analysis and strategies to limit cascading failure , 2014 .

[32]  Hans J. Herrmann,et al.  Towards designing robust coupled networks , 2011, Scientific Reports.