Adequate margin definition for scanned particle therapy in the incidence of intrafractional motion.

Advanced 4D dose calculations (4DDCs) for scanned particle therapy show that in the incidence of motion, it is insufficient to use target contours defined on one reference CT phase. ICRU Report 62 (ICRU 1999 ICRU Report 62 (Bethesda, MD: ICRU)) advises that variations in size, shape and position of CTVs relative to anatomic reference points have to be considered for internal target volumes (ITVs). In addition to geometrical margin adaption, changes of water equivalent path length have to be considered for particle therapy. Different ITV concepts have been applied to six representative patients (liver and lung indications) based on 4DCT. Geometrical ITVs (gITV) were calculated by combining deformed CTVs over all motion phases. To take into account path length changes, range adapted ITVs (raITV) were established as the union of range adapted CTVs in all phases. For gated delivery, gat_gITVs and gat_raITVs were calculated. Extensive 4DDCs have been performed for two exemplary patients to illustrate that neither re-scanning nor gating can sufficiently compensate for motion effects if no appropriate margins are employed and to evaluate the effectiveness of gITVs and raITVs. CTVs significantly differ from gITVs and raITVs in size (up to a factor 2 in volume). But also raITVs and gITVs differ significantly in size and are spatially displaced, particularly for lung patients. raITVs show a strong field dependence in shape. All volumes are reduced in size when gating is applied and considered during margin adaption. 4D dose distributions show big improvements when gITV or raITV are used compared to CTVs. However, the use of either gITVs or raITVs do not result in significant differences. If raITVs are used, slightly better target coverage is gained at the cost of more healthy tissue exposure. Our results emphasize that adapted target volumes have to be used for scanned particle therapy in the presence of motion. However, even though gITVs and raITVs differ significantly in shape and size, this difference does not necessarily translate into significant differences in the resultant 4D dose distributions.

[1]  Antje Knopf,et al.  Mapping motion from 4D-MRI to 3D-CT for use in 4D dose calculations: A technical feasibility study. , 2013, Medical physics.

[2]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  M. Phillips,et al.  Effects of respiratory motion on dose uniformity with a charged particle scanning method. , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  P Boesiger,et al.  4D MR imaging of respiratory organ motion and its variability , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  George T. Y. Chen,et al.  Deformable registration of 4D computed tomography data. , 2006, Medical physics.

[6]  Christoph Bert,et al.  Quantification of interplay effects of scanned particle beams and moving targets , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Christoph Bert,et al.  4D treatment planning for scanned ion beams , 2007, Radiation oncology.

[8]  Antje-Christin Knopf,et al.  Scanned proton radiotherapy for mobile targets—the effectiveness of re-scanning in the context of different treatment planning approaches and for different motion characteristics , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Eike Rietzel,et al.  Four-dimensional proton treatment planning for lung tumors. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  A. Coray,et al.  A NOVEL GANTRY FOR PROTON THERAPY AT THE PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUTE , 2002 .

[11]  H. Tsujii,et al.  Local control and recurrence of stage I non-small cell lung cancer after carbon ion radiotherapy. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  A J Lomax,et al.  Experimental verification of IMPT treatment plans in an anthropomorphic phantom in the presence of delivery uncertainties , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  M. Moerland,et al.  A conformation number to quantify the degree of conformality in brachytherapy and external beam irradiation: application to the prostate. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  E Pedroni,et al.  Monte Carlo dose calculations for spot scanned proton therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Michael J Ackerman,et al.  Engineering and algorithm design for an image processing Api: a technical report on ITK--the Insight Toolkit. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[16]  A J Lomax,et al.  Respiratory liver motion estimation and its effect on scanned proton beam therapy , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Christoph Bert,et al.  Respiratory motion management in particle therapy. , 2010, Medical physics.

[18]  Marco Durante,et al.  Motion mitigation in intensity modulated particle therapy by internal target volumes covering range changes. , 2012, Medical physics.

[19]  Haiying Liu,et al.  A Generic Framework for Non-rigid Registration Based on Non-uniform Multi-level Free-Form Deformations , 2001, MICCAI.

[20]  Eike Rietzel,et al.  Deformable registration of 4D computed tomography data. , 2006, Medical physics.

[21]  D Meer,et al.  A study on repainting strategies for treating moderately moving targets with proton pencil beam scanning at the new Gantry 2 at PSI , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Martin von Siebenthal,et al.  Analysis and modelling of respiratory liver motion using 4DMRI , 2008 .