Coseismic slip distribution of the February 27, 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule, Chile earthquake

[1] Static offsets produced by the February 27, 2010 Mw = 8.8 Maule, Chile earthquake as measured by GPS and InSAR constrain coseismic slip along a section of the Andean megathrust of dimensions 650 km (in length) × 180 km (in width). GPS data have been collected from both campaign and continuous sites sampling both the near-field and far field. ALOS/PALSAR data from several ascending and descending tracks constrain the near-field crustal deformation. Inversions of the geodetic data for distributed slip on the megathrust reveal a pronounced slip maximum of order 15 m at ∼15–25 km depth on the megathrust offshore Lloca, indicating that seismic slip was greatest north of the epicenter of the bilaterally propagating rupture. A secondary slip maximum appears at depth ∼25 km on the megathrust just west of Concepcion. Coseismic slip is negligible below 35 km depth. Estimates of the seismic moment based on different datasets and modeling approaches vary from 1.8 to 2.6 × 1022 N m. Our study is the first to model the static displacement field using a layered spherical Earth model, allowing us to incorporate both near-field and far-field static displacements in a consistent manner. The obtained seismic moment of 1.97 × 1022 N m, corresponding to a moment magnitude of 8.8, is similar to that obtained by previous seismic and geodetic inversions.

[1]  Göran Ekström,et al.  Global seismicity of 2003: centroid–moment-tensor solutions for 1087 earthquakes , 2005 .

[2]  Chen Ji,et al.  Afterslip of the 2010 Chilean earthquake , 2010 .

[3]  M. Bevis,et al.  Crustal motion in the Southern Andes (26°–36°S): Do the Andes behave like a microplate? , 2003 .

[4]  Fred F. Pollitz,et al.  Joint estimation of afterslip rate and postseismic relaxation following the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake , 1998 .

[5]  Z. Altamimi,et al.  ITRF2005 : A new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame based on time series of station positions and Earth Orientation Parameters , 2007 .

[6]  J. Nocquet,et al.  Slip distribution of the February 27, 2010 Mw = 8.8 Maule Earthquake, central Chile, from static and high‐rate GPS, InSAR, and broadband teleseismic data , 2010 .

[7]  John McCloskey,et al.  Limited overlap between the seismic gap and coseismic slip of the great 2010 Chile earthquake , 2011 .

[8]  Masanobu Shimada,et al.  The 2010 Maule, Chile earthquake: Downdip rupture limit revealed by space geodesy , 2010 .

[9]  John H. Woodhouse,et al.  Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity , 1981 .

[10]  Fred F. Pollitz,et al.  Coseismic Deformation From Earthquake Faulting On A Layered Spherical Earth , 1996 .

[11]  M. Bevis,et al.  Geodetic determination of relative plate motion and crustal deformation across the Scotia‐South America plate boundary in eastern Tierra del Fuego , 2003 .

[12]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Teleseismic inversion for rupture process of the 27 February 2010 Chile (Mw 8.8) earthquake , 2010 .

[13]  A. Rietbrock,et al.  The Southern Andes between 36° and 40°S latitude: seismicity and average seismic velocities , 2002 .

[14]  M. Bevis,et al.  The Nazca -South America Euler vector and its rate of change , 2003 .

[15]  M. Moreno,et al.  2010 Maule earthquake slip correlates with pre-seismic locking of Andean subduction zone , 2010, Nature.

[16]  R. Madariaga,et al.  Upper plate deformation measured by GPS in the Coquimbo Gap, Chile , 2009 .

[17]  Dimitar Dimitrov,et al.  Interseismic strain accumulation measured by GPS in the seismic gap between Constitución and Concepción in Chile , 2009 .