Controlling for individual differences in fMRI brain activation to tones, syllables, and words

Previous neuroimaging studies have consistently reported bilateral activation to speech stimuli in the superior temporal gyrus (STG) and have identified an anteroventral stream of speech processing along the superior temporal sulcus (STS). However, little attention has been devoted to the possible confound of individual differences in hemispheric dominance for speech. The present study was designed to test for speech-selective activation while controlling for inter-individual variance in auditory laterality, by using only subjects with at least 10% right ear advantage (REA) on the dichotic listening test. Eighteen right-handed, healthy male volunteers (median age 26) participated in the study. The stimuli were words, syllables, and sine wave tones (220-2600 Hz), presented in a block design. Comparing words > tones and syllables > tones yielded activation in the left posterior MTG and the lateral STG (upper bank of STS). In the right temporal lobe, the activation was located in the MTG/STS (lower bank). Comparing left and right temporal lobe cluster sizes from the words > tones and syllables > tones contrasts on single-subject level demonstrated a statistically significant left lateralization for speech sound processing in the STS/MTG area. The asymmetry analyses suggest that dichotic listening may be a suitable method for selecting a homogenous group of subjects with respect to left hemisphere language dominance.

[1]  A. Braun,et al.  Auditory lexical decision, categorical perception, and FM direction discrimination differentially engage left and right auditory cortex , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  R J Ilmoniemi,et al.  Noise affects speech-signal processing differently in the cerebral hemispheres. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[3]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Background acoustic noise and the hemispheric lateralization of speech processing in the human brain: magnetic mismatch negativity study , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[4]  K. Hugdahl.  Dichotic Listening in the study of auditory laterality. , 2003 .

[5]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  The asymmetrical brain , 2003 .

[6]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Analysis of temporal structure in sound by the human brain , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  Peter L. Williams,et al.  Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Medicine and Surgery , 1996 .

[8]  J. Binder,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human auditory cortex , 1994, Annals of neurology.

[9]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging of Language , 2001 .

[10]  H. Scheich,et al.  Phonetic Perception and the Temporal Cortex , 2002, NeuroImage.

[11]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Human Brain Language Areas Identified by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Function of the left planum temporale in auditory and linguistic processing , 1996, NeuroImage.

[13]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[14]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition , 2001 .

[15]  N. Dronkers,et al.  Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension , 2004, Cognition.

[16]  William H. Gaddes,et al.  Performance on a free-recall verbal dichotic listening task and cerebral dominance determined by the carotid amytal test , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  M. Torrens.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[18]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[19]  A. Lundervold,et al.  Dichotic-listening performance and intracarotid injections of amobarbital in children and adolescents. Preoperative and postoperative comparisons. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[20]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex , 2000, Nature.

[21]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[22]  J. A. Frost,et al.  Conceptual Processing during the Conscious Resting State: A Functional MRI Study , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[24]  J. Rauschecker.  Parallel Processing in the Auditory Cortex of Primates , 1998, Audiology and Neurotology.

[25]  M. Raichle,et al.  Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  E. T. Possing,et al.  Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Mechanisms and streams for processing of "what" and "where" in auditory cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  J. Binder,et al.  The new neuroanatomy of speech perception. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  C. Price,et al.  Speech-specific auditory processing: where is it? , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  M. Mesulam,et al.  From sensation to cognition. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  S. Scott,et al.  Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  K. Hugdahl,et al.  Lateralization of cognitive processes in the brain. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[33]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modelling Geometric Deformations in Epi Time Series , 2022 .

[35]  R J Wise,et al.  Separate neural subsystems within 'Wernicke's area'. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  Karsten Specht,et al.  Functional segregation of the temporal lobes into highly differentiated subsystems for auditory perception: an auditory rapid event-related fMRI-task , 2003, NeuroImage.

[37]  C. Price,et al.  The Constraints Functional Neuroimaging Places on Classical Models of Auditory Word Processing , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  Joseph A Maldjian,et al.  Precentral gyrus discrepancy in electronic versions of the Talairach atlas , 2004, NeuroImage.

[39]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[40]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Distribution of cortical neural networks involved in word comprehension and word retrieval. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[42]  J. Binder,et al.  A Parametric Manipulation of Factors Affecting Task-induced Deactivation in Functional Neuroimaging , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  K. Hugdahl,et al.  Dichotic listening and reading acquisition in children: a one-year follow-up. , 1987, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[44]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Detection of Sounds in the Auditory Stream: Event-Related fMRI Evidence for Differential Activation to Speech and Nonspeech , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  P A Bandettini,et al.  Effects of stimulus rate on signal response during functional magnetic resonance imaging of auditory cortex. , 1994, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[46]  Guillaume Thierry,et al.  Hemispheric Dissociation in Access to the Human Semantic System , 2003, Neuron.