Flexible correction processes in social judgment: the role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias.

Unlike many models of bias correction, our flexible correction model posits that corrections occur when judges are motivated and able to adjust assessments of targets according to their naive theories of how the context affects judgments of the target(s). In the current research, people flexibly correct assessments of different targets within the same context according to the differing theories associated with the context-target pairs. In Study 1, shared theories of assimilation and contrast bias are identified. Corrections consistent with those theories are obtained in Studies 2 and 3. Study 4 shows that idiographic measures of theories of bias predict the direction and magnitude of corrections. Implications of this work for corrections of attributions and bias removal in general are discussed.

[1]  D. Wegener.  The flexible correction model: using naive theories of bias to correct assessments of targets / , 1994 .

[2]  L. Newman,et al.  Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Spontaneous Trait Inference , 1990 .

[3]  J. G. Miller.  Culture and development of everyday social explanation. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  G. Bower,et al.  Mood effects on person-perception judgments. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information. , 1994 .

[6]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Effects of Epistemic Motivations on the Use of Accessible Constructs in Social Judgment , 1995 .

[7]  G. T. Fong,et al.  Inadmissible evidence and juror verdicts. , 1981 .

[8]  O. J. Harvey,et al.  Judgments of weight as affected by adaptation range, adaptation duration, magnitude of unlabeled anchor, and judgmental language. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  M. Morris.  Culture and cause: American and Chinese understandings of physical and social causality. , 1993 .

[10]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Contrast effects and judgments of physical attractiveness: When beauty becomes a social problem. , 1980 .

[11]  R. Rosenthal.  Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[12]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgments , 1980 .

[13]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .

[14]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Part-Whole Question Sequences: A Conversational Logic Analysis , 1991 .

[15]  John A. Bargh,et al.  Unconscious sources of subjectivity and suffering: Is consciousness the solution? , 1992 .

[16]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[17]  D. Gilbert,et al.  On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. , 1988 .

[18]  T. Ostrom,et al.  Psychological Perspective in Attitude Research , 1984 .

[19]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change , 1981 .

[20]  R. Wyer,et al.  Person memory and judgments: the impact of information that one is told to disregard. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  Feelings, direction of attention, and expressed evaluations of others , 1990 .

[22]  D. Long,et al.  Instructions to disregard potentially useful information: The effects of pragmatics on evaluative judgments and recall , 1990 .

[23]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[24]  C. Anderson,et al.  Effects of Explanation and Counter-Explanation on the Development and Use of Social Theories. , 1986 .

[25]  D. Campbell,et al.  Separating perceptual and linguistic effects of context shifts upon absolute judgments. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  F. Strack,et al.  “Order Effects” in Survey Research: Activation and Information Functions of Preceding Questions , 1992 .

[27]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  F. Strack.  The different routes to social judgments: Experiential versus informational strategies , 1992 .

[29]  C. Sedikides.  Effects of Fortuitously Activated Constructs Versus Activated Communication Goals on Person Impressions , 1990 .

[30]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. , 1983 .

[31]  F. Strack,et al.  Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast , 1993 .

[32]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Constructing reality and its alternatives: an inclusion/ exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment , 1992 .

[33]  N. Schwarz.  Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. , 1990 .

[34]  K. Williams,et al.  The Effects of Group Diffusion of Cognitive Effort on Attitudes: An Information-Processing View. , 1980 .

[35]  P. Herr,et al.  On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects , 1983 .

[36]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Unconscious Influences of Memory for a Prior Event , 1987 .

[37]  L. Berkowitz.  Towards a general theory of anger and emotional aggression: Implications of the cognitive-neoassociationistic perspective for the analysis of anger and other emotions. , 1993 .

[38]  M. Biernat,et al.  Comparison and expectancy processes in human judgment. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Flexible Correction Processes in Social Judgment: Correcting for Context-Induced Contrast , 1993 .

[40]  John J. Skowronski,et al.  Implicit Versus Explicit Impression Formation: The Differing Effects of Overt Labeling and Covert Priming on Memory and Impressions , 1993 .

[41]  M. Dermer,et al.  Evaluative judgments of aspects of life as a function of vicarious exposure to hedonic extremes. , 1979 .

[42]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Advanced BASIC meta-analysis , 1989 .

[43]  P. Devine.  Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[44]  A. Tesser.  Self-Generated Attitude Change , 1978 .

[45]  Leonard L. Martin,et al.  Assimilation and contrast as a function of people's willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression. , 1990 .

[46]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[47]  R. Petty,et al.  Positive Mood and Persuasion: Different Roles for Affect Under High- and Low-Elaboration Conditions , 1993 .

[48]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Judging the predictors of one's own mood: Accuracy and the use of shared theories , 1982 .

[49]  Leonard L. Martin,et al.  Beyond accessibility: The role of processing objectives in judgment , 1992 .

[50]  J. Bargh,et al.  The Role of Consciousness in Priming Effects on Categorization , 1987 .

[51]  Daniel T. Gilbert,et al.  Thinking backward: some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness , 1989 .

[52]  D. Krull,et al.  Does the Grist Change the Mill? The Effect of the Perceiver's Inferential Goal on the Process of Social Inference , 1993 .

[53]  J. Bargh.  Does subliminality matter to social psychology? Awareness of the stimulus versus awareness of its influence. , 1992 .

[54]  L. L. Martin,et al.  Set/reset: use and disuse of concepts in impression formation. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  George A. Quattrone.  Overattribution and unit formation: When behavior engulfs the person. , 1982 .