Left Ventricular Function Can Reliably be Assessed From Dual-Source CT Using ECG-Gated Tube Current Modulation

Purpose:The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of global left ventricular (LV) function analysis using dual source CT (DSCT) with and without ECG-gated tube current modulation in comparison with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Methods and Materials:In 7 pigs with myocardial infarction retrospectively ECG-gated DSCT (2 × 64 × 0.6 mm; 120kV; 380mAsrot.) with and without tube current modulation (gating window: 40%–75%) as well as cine MR imaging of the heart were performed on the same day. From DSCT data 6 mm double-oblique short axis images were computed. DSCT as well as MR images were analyzed using Simpson method. LV volumes, ejection fraction and, myocardial mass were calculated. Wall motion was assessed visually. Standard deviations of attenuation values measured in the LV cavity were assigned to image noise and compared using Wilcoxon test. LV volumes were compared with Lin concordance-correlation coefficient (&rgr;c). Regional wall motion was analyzed with weighted kappa statistics. Results:Both, DSCT with (DSCTDM) and without (DSCTnorm) dose modulation were in good agreement with MR imaging. For ejection fraction, there was an excellent concordance-correlation comparing DSCTnorm with DSCTDM (&rgr;c = 0.9749), DSCTnorm with MR imaging (&rgr;c = 0.9435), and DSCTDM with MR imaging (&rgr;c = 0.9612). The corresponding kappa values comparing regional wall motion were &kgr; = 0.988, &kgr; = 0.901, and &kgr; = 0.888, respectively. During end-systole there was no significant difference in the image noise between DSCTnorm and DSCTDM techniques (P = 0.8750), but the difference became significant when comparing end-diastolic DSCT images (P = 0.0156). Conclusions:ECG-gated tube-current modulation does not hamper the quantitative assessment of global and regional LV function using DSCT.

[1]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[2]  K. Hammermeister,et al.  Variables predictive of survival in patients with coronary disease. Selection by univariate and multivariate analyses from the clinical, electrocardiographic, exercise, arteriographic, and quantitative angiographic evaluations. , 1979, Circulation.

[3]  M. Bettmann,et al.  Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: effects of a nonionic agent vs. a standard ionic agent. , 1984, Radiology.

[4]  R M Whitlock,et al.  Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. , 1987, Circulation.

[5]  N. Reichek,et al.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. , 1989, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[6]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  E. Negri,et al.  Determinants of 6‐Month Mortality in Survivors of Myocardial Infarction After Thrombolysis Results of the GISSI‐2 Data Base , 1993, Circulation.

[8]  B. Thompson,et al.  Evaluation of cardiac function with ultrafast computed tomography. , 1994, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[9]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. , 2002, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[10]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association , 2002, The international journal of cardiovascular imaging.

[11]  Giacomo Luccichenti,et al.  Parameters affecting bolus geometry in CTA: a review. , 2002, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  R. Günther,et al.  Low-Dose Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography in Acute Lung Injury: Animal Experience , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[13]  C D Claussen,et al.  Estimation of radiation exposure in 16-detector row computed tomography of the heart with retrospective ECG-gating. , 2003, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[14]  A. Kopp,et al.  Darstellung von Pulmonalvenenstenosen nach Radiofrequenzablation zur Behandlung von Vorhofflimmern unter Verwendung der Multidetektor Computertomographie mit retrospektivem Gating , 2003 .

[15]  R. Günther,et al.  Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction , 2005, European Radiology.

[16]  Marco Das,et al.  Global left ventricular function in cardiac CT. Evaluation of an automated 3D region-growing segmentation algorithm , 2006, European Radiology.

[17]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[18]  R. Morin,et al.  Effect of Acquisition Technique on Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Multidetector Row Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography With Submillimeter Collimation , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[19]  Roman Fischbach,et al.  Left ventricular function studied with MDCT , 2006, European Radiology.

[20]  Marc A Pfeffer,et al.  Comparison of regional versus global assessment of left ventricular function in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or both after myocardial infarction: the valsartan in acute myocardial infarction echocardiographic study. , 2006, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[21]  Georg Mühlenbruch,et al.  Cardiac CT: coronary arteries and beyond , 2007, European Radiology.

[22]  Georg Mühlenbruch,et al.  Automated vs. manual assessment of left ventricular function in cardiac multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, European Radiology.

[23]  Gorka Bastarrika,et al.  Quantification of left ventricular function and mass in cardiac Dual-Source CT (DSCT) exams: comparison of manual and semiautomatic segmentation algorithms , 2008, European Radiology.

[24]  S. Y. Kim,et al.  Uniform image quality achieved by tube current modulation using SD of attenuation in coronary CT angiography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  A. Schmermund,et al.  Use of automatic exposure control in multislice computed tomography of the coronaries: comparison of 16-slice and 64-slice scanner data with conventional coronary angiography , 2007, Heart.

[26]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Left Ventricular and Left Atrial Dimensions and Volumes: Comparison Between Dual-Source CT and Echocardiography , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[27]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose , 2008, European Radiology.

[28]  W. Heindel,et al.  Global left-ventricular function assessment using dual-source multidetector CT: effect of improved temporal resolution on ventricular volume measurement , 2008, European Radiology.

[29]  C. Claussen,et al.  Dual-source computed tomography: estimation of radiation exposure of ECG-gated and ECG-triggered coronary angiography. , 2010, European journal of radiology.