Initial PET performance evaluation of a preclinical insert for PET/MRI with digital SiPM technology

Abstract Hyperion-IID is a positron emission tomography (PET) insert which allows simultaneous operation in a clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. To read out the scintillation light of the employed lutetium yttrium orthosilicate crystal arrays with a pitch of 1 mm and 12 mm in height, digital silicon photomultipliers (DPC 3200-22, Philips Digital Photon Counting) (DPC) are used. The basic PET performance in terms of energy resolution, coincidence resolution time (CRT) and sensitivity as a function of the operating parameters, such as the operating temperature, the applied overvoltage, activity and configuration parameters of the DPCs, has been evaluated at system level. The measured energy resolution did not show a large dependency on the selected parameters and is in the range of 12.4%–12.9% for low activity, degrading to  ∼13.6% at an activity of  ∼100 MBq. The CRT strongly depends on the selected trigger scheme (trig) of the DPCs, and we measured approximately 260 ps, 440 ps, 550 ps and 1300 ps for trig 1–4, respectively. The trues sensitivity for a NEMA NU 4 mouse-sized scatter phantom with a 70 mm long tube of activity was dependent on the operating parameters and was determined to be 0.4%–1.4% at low activity. The random fraction stayed below 5% at activity up to 100 MBq and the scatter fraction was evaluated as  ∼6% for an energy window of 411 keV–561 keV and  ∼16% for 250 keV–625 keV. Furthermore, we performed imaging experiments using a mouse-sized hot-rod phantom and a large rabbit-sized phantom. In 2D slices of the reconstructed mouse-sized hot-rod phantom (∅ = 28 mm), the rods were distinguishable from each other down to a rod size of 0.8 mm. There was no benefit from the better CRT of trig 1 over trig 3, where in the larger rabbit-sized phantom (∅ = 114 mm) we were able to show a clear improvement in image quality using the time-of-flight information. The findings will allow system architects—aiming at a similar detector design using DPCs—to make predictions about the design requirements and the performance that can be expected.

[1]  Volkmar Schulz,et al.  Development of an MRI compatible digital SiPM based PET detector stack for simultaneous preclinical PET/MRI , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[2]  H. Jadvar,et al.  Competitive advantage of PET/MRI. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[3]  Josep F. Oliver,et al.  Singles-prompts-randoms: Estimation of spurious data rates in PET , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[4]  Alfred S. Eichner,et al.  A Look Ahead , 1979 .

[5]  Volkmar Schulz,et al.  ToF Performance Evaluation of PET Modules With Digital Silicon Photomultiplier Technology During MR Operation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[6]  T. Frach,et al.  The digital silicon photomultiplier — Principle of operation and intrinsic detector performance , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[7]  Til Aach,et al.  Simultaneous Reconstruction of Activity and Attenuation for PET/MR , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  S. Vandenberghe,et al.  Effects of dark counts on Digital Silicon Photomultipliers performance , 2013, 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC).

[9]  H. Zaidi,et al.  An outlook on future design of hybrid PET/MRI systems. , 2011, Medical physics.

[10]  V. Schulz,et al.  First evaluations of the neighbor logic of the digital SiPM tile , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[11]  Volkmar Schulz,et al.  PET performance and MRI compatibility evaluation of a digital, ToF-capable PET/MRI insert equipped with clinical scintillators , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  V. Schulz,et al.  PET/MRI insert using digital SiPMs: Investigation of MR-compatibility , 2014, Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment.

[13]  S. Vandenberghe,et al.  DigiPET: sub-millimeter spatial resolution small-animal PET imaging using thin monolithic scintillators , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  D. Schaart,et al.  First characterization of a digital SiPM based time-of-flight PET detector with 1 mm spatial resolution , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Giacomo Borghi,et al.  Probabilities of triggering and validation in a digital silicon photomultiplier , 2014 .

[16]  Qinan Bao,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the Inveon Dedicated PET Preclinical Tomograph Based on the NEMA NU-4 Standards , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Volkmar Schulz,et al.  Design concept of world's first preclinical PET/MR insert with fully digital silicon photomultiplier technology , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[18]  René M. Botnar,et al.  A Digital Preclinical PET/MRI Insert and Initial Results , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Volkmar Schulz,et al.  Gradient transparent RF housing for simultaneous PET/MRI using carbon fiber composites , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[20]  H. Schlemmer,et al.  A look ahead: PET/MR versus PET/CT , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[21]  V. Schulz,et al.  Data Processing for a High Resolution Preclinical PET Detector Based on Philips DPC Digital SiPMs , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[22]  R. Fontaine,et al.  Imaging performance of LabPET APD-based digital PET scanners for pre-clinical research , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Optimized light sharing for high-resolution TOF PET detector based on digital silicon photomultipliers. , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Gerald Antoch,et al.  Oncologic PET/MRI, Part 2: Bone Tumors, Soft-Tissue Tumors, Melanoma, and Lymphoma , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  René M. Botnar,et al.  A Self-Normalization Reconstruction Technique for PET Scans Using the Positron Emission Data , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  P Gebhardt,et al.  MR-compatibility assessment of the first preclinical PET-MRI insert equipped with digital silicon photomultipliers , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  B. Zwaans,et al.  Arrays of digital Silicon Photomultipliers — Intrinsic performance and application to scintillator readout , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[28]  D. Schaart,et al.  The statistical distribution of the number of counted scintillation photons in digital silicon photomultipliers: model and validation , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  T. Frach,et al.  The digital Silicon Photomultiplier — A novel sensor for the detection of scintillation light , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[30]  Carsten Degenhardt,et al.  The digital silicon photomultiplier — System architecture and performance evaluation , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[31]  V. Schulz,et al.  Fast and unbiased 3D calibration method of arbitrary scintillator based PET detectors , 2013, 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC).

[32]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[33]  Bernd J Pichler,et al.  Latest Advances in Molecular Imaging Instrumentation , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  Roger Lecomte,et al.  NEMA NU 4-2008 Comparison of Preclinical PET Imaging Systems , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[35]  S. Spirou,et al.  First performance tests of a digital photon counter (DPC) array coupled to a CsI(Tl) crystal matrix for potential use in SPECT , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  Paul K Marsden,et al.  PET-MRI: a review of challenges and solutions in the development of integrated multimodality imaging , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  S. Ziegler,et al.  A PET detector prototype based on digital SiPMs and GAGG scintillators , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[38]  G. Borghi,et al.  Sub-200 ps CRT in monolithic scintillator PET detectors using digital SiPM arrays and maximum likelihood interaction time estimation , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  R. F. Brown,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION , 2019, ISO 22301:2019 and business continuity management – Understand how to plan, implement and enhance a business continuity management system (BCMS).

[40]  C. W. Lerche,et al.  Towards Software-Based Real-Time Singles and Coincidence Processing of Digital PET Detector Raw Data , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[41]  S. Siegel,et al.  Digital Time Alignment of High Resolution PET Inveon Block Detectors , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[42]  P. Major,et al.  National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU-4 Performance Evaluation of the PET Component of the NanoPET/CT Preclinical PET/CT Scanner , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[43]  A. Drzezga,et al.  First Clinical Experience with Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR: Comparison to PET/CT in Patients with Oncologic Diagnoses , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[44]  G. Antoch,et al.  Oncologic PET/MRI, Part 1: Tumors of the Brain, Head and Neck, Chest, Abdomen, and Pelvis , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[45]  Volkmar Schulz,et al.  MR compatibility aspects of a silicon photomultiplier-based PET/RF insert with integrated digitisation , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[46]  Volkmar Schulz,et al.  Software-Based Real-Time Acquisition and Processing of PET Detector Raw Data , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[47]  Volkmar Schulz,et al.  FPGA-based singles and coincidences processing pipeline for integrated digital PET/MR detectors , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[48]  Bernd J Pichler,et al.  Principles of PET/MR Imaging , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[49]  D. Jordan,et al.  Initial characterization of a prototype digital photon counting PET system , 2014 .

[50]  Maurizio Conti,et al.  Randoms and TOF gain revisited , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[51]  V. Schulz,et al.  Investigation of a sub-millimeter resolution PET detector with depth of interaction encoding using digital SiPM single sided readout , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[52]  R. Dorscheid,et al.  Performance evaluation of a prototype Positron Emission Tomography scanner using Digital Photon Counters (DPC) , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[53]  Volkmar Schulz,et al.  Development of an MRI-compatible digital SiPM detector stack for simultaneous PET/MRI , 2016, Biomedical physics & engineering express.