A NOTE ON THE CHOICE OF AN ANCHOR TEST IN EQUATING
暂无分享,去创建一个
Shelby J. Haberman | Sandip Sinharay | Paul W. Holland | Charles Lewis | P. Holland | S. Haberman | S. Sinharay | C. Lewis
[1] P. Holland,et al. Is It Necessary to Make Anchor Tests Mini-Versions of the Tests Being Equated or Can Some Restrictions Be Relaxed? , 2007 .
[2] D. Jarjoura,et al. THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTENT REPRESENTATION FOR COMMON‐ITEM EQUATING WITH NONRANDOM GROUPS , 1985 .
[3] Dorothy T. Thayer,et al. THE KERNEL METHOD OF EQUATING SCORE DISTRIBUTIONS , 1989 .
[4] L. Tucker,et al. Maximum validity of a test with equivalent items , 1946, Psychometrika.
[5] P. Holland,et al. THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE SCORES OF A TEST AND AN ANCHOR TEST , 2006 .
[6] Michael J. Kolen,et al. Scaling, Norming, and Equating , 2011 .
[7] Linda L. Cook,et al. Problems Related to the Use of Conventional and Item Response Theory Equating Methods in Less Than Optimal Circumstances , 1987 .
[8] R. Brennan,et al. Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking: Methods and Practices , 2004 .
[9] P. Holland,et al. Observed Score Equating Using a Mini-Version Anchor and an Anchor with Less Spread of Difficulty: A Comparison Study , 2011 .
[10] R. Brennan,et al. Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking , 2004 .
[11] Test Score Equating Using a Mini‐Version Anchor and a Midi Anchor: A Case Study Using SAT® Data , 2011 .