Comparison between magnetic bead and qPCR library normalisation methods for forensic MPS genotyping

Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) is fast approaching operational use in forensic science, with the capability to analyse hundreds of DNA identity and DNA intelligence markers in multiple samples simultaneously. The ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Kit on MiSeq FGx™ (Illumina) workflow can provide profiles for autosomal short tandem repeats (STRs), X chromosome and Y chromosome STRs, identity single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), biogeographical ancestry SNPs and phenotype (eye and hair colour) SNPs from a sample. The library preparation procedure involves a series of steps including target amplification, library purification and library normalisation. This study highlights the comparison between the manufacturer recommended magnetic bead normalisation and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) methods. Furthermore, two qPCR chemistries, KAPA® (KAPA Biosystems) and NEBNext® (New England Bio Inc.), have also been compared. The qPCR outperformed the bead normalisation method, while the NEBNext® kit obtained higher genotype concordance than KAPA®. The study also established an MPS workflow that can be utilised in any operational forensic laboratory.

[1]  Manfred Kayser,et al.  Forensic DNA Phenotyping: Predicting human appearance from crime scene material for investigative purposes. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[2]  H. S. Mogensen,et al.  Evaluation of the Ion Torrent™ HID SNP 169-plex: A SNP typing assay developed for human identification by second generation sequencing. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[3]  Bruce Budowle,et al.  Evaluation of the Illumina(®) Beta Version ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit for use in genetic profiling. , 2016, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[4]  Niels Morling,et al.  Next generation sequencing and its applications in forensic genetics. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[5]  Á. Carracedo,et al.  A SNaPshot of next generation sequencing for forensic SNP analysis. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[6]  Bruce Budowle,et al.  Forensically relevant SNP classes. , 2008, BioTechniques.

[7]  Jocelyne Bruand,et al.  Developmental validation of the MiSeq FGx Forensic Genomics System for Targeted Next Generation Sequencing in Forensic DNA Casework and Database Laboratories. , 2017, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[8]  H. Swerdlow,et al.  A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers , 2012, BMC Genomics.

[9]  C. Phillips,et al.  Massively parallel sequencing of customised forensically informative SNP panels on the MiSeq , 2016, Electrophoresis.

[10]  Manfred Kayser,et al.  Improving human forensics through advances in genetics, genomics and molecular biology , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[11]  Ashley L. Silvia,et al.  A preliminary assessment of the ForenSeq™ FGx System: next generation sequencing of an STR and SNP multiplex , 2016, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[12]  J. Harris,et al.  Comparison of Normalization Methods for Construction of Large, Multiplex Amplicon Pools for Next-Generation Sequencing , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  Niels Morling,et al.  Second-generation sequencing of forensic STRs using the Ion Torrent™ HID STR 10-plex and the Ion PGM™. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[14]  Maximilian E. R. Weiss,et al.  Validation of a semiconductor next-generation sequencing assay for the clinical genetic screening of CFTR , 2015, Molecular genetics & genomic medicine.