A review of metal-ion-flux-controlled growth of metastable TiAlN by HIPIMS/DCMS co-sputtering

Abstract We review results on the growth of metastable Ti1−xAlxN alloy films by hybrid high-power pulsed and dc magnetron co-sputtering (HIPIMS/DCMS) using the time domain to apply substrate bias either in synchronous with the entire HIPIMS pulse or just the metal-rich portion of the pulse in mixed Ar/N2 discharges. Depending upon which elemental target, Ti or Al, is powered by HIPIMS, distinctly different film-growth kinetic pathways are observed due to charge and mass differences in the metal-ion fluxes incident at the growth surface. Al+ ion irradiation during Al–HIPIMS/Ti–DCMS at 500 °C, with a negative substrate bias Vs = 60 V synchronized to the HIPIMS pulse (thus suppressing Ar+ ion irradiation due to DCMS), leads to single-phase NaCl-structure Ti1−xAlxN films (x ≤ 0.60) with high hardness (> 30 GPa with x > 0.55) and low stress (0.2–0.8 GPa compressive). Ar+ ion bombardment can be further suppressed in favor of predominantly Al+ ion irradiation by synchronizing the substrate bias to only the metal-ion-rich portion of the Al–HIPIMS pulse. In distinct contrast, Ti–HIPIMS/Al–DCMS Ti1 − xAlxN layers grown with Ti+/Ti2 + metal ion irradiation and the same HIPIMS-synchronized Vs value, are two-phase mixtures, NaCl-structure Ti1−xAlxN plus wurtzite AlN, exhibiting low hardness (≃ 18 GPa) with high compressive stresses, up to − 3.5 GPa. In both cases, film properties are controlled by the average metal-ion momentum per deposited atom transferred to the film surface. During Ti–HIPIMS, the growing film is subjected to an intense flux of doubly-ionized Ti2+, while Al2+ irradiation is insignificant during Al–HIPIMS. This asymmetry is decisive since the critical limit for precipitation of w-AlN, 135 [eV-amu]1/2, is easily exceeded during Ti–HIPIMS, even with no intentional bias. The high Ti2 + ion flux is primarily due to the second ionization potential (IP2) of Ti being lower than the first IP (IP1) of Ar. New results involving the HIPIMS growth of metastable Ti1−xAlxN alloy films from segmented TiAl targets are consistent with the above conclusions.

[1]  Lars Hultman,et al.  Microstructural evolution during film growth , 2003 .

[2]  I. Petrov,et al.  Average energy deposited per atom : a universal parameter for describing ion-assisted film growth ? , 1993 .

[3]  I. Petrov,et al.  High‐flux low‐energy (≂20 eV) N+2 ion irradiation during TiN deposition by reactive magnetron sputtering: Effects on microstructure and preferred orientation , 1995 .

[4]  J. Vlček,et al.  Highly ionized fluxes of sputtered titanium atoms in high-power pulsed magnetron discharges , 2008 .

[5]  A. Agarwal,et al.  Comparative wear performance of titanium based coatings for automotive applications using exhaust gas recirculation , 2007 .

[6]  Shicai Yang,et al.  Hybrid HIPIMS and DC magnetron sputtering deposition of TiN coatings: Deposition rate, structure and tribological properties , 2013 .

[7]  J. Abelson,et al.  Mass and energy resolved detection of ions and neutral sputtered species incident at the substrate during reactive magnetron sputtering of Ti in mixed Ar+N2 mixtures , 1994 .

[8]  Arutiun P. Ehiasarian,et al.  Ionization of sputtered metals in high power pulsed magnetron sputtering , 2005 .

[9]  L. Hultman,et al.  $\hbox{CrN}_{\rm x}$ Films Prepared by DC Magnetron Sputtering and High-Power Pulsed Magnetron Sputtering: A Comparative Study , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[10]  H. Oettel,et al.  Residual stresses in nitride hard coatings prepared by magnetron sputtering and arc evaporation , 1995 .

[11]  J. Zapien,et al.  Cubic boron nitride thin film deposition by unbalanced magnetron sputtering and dc pulsed substrate biasing , 1998 .

[12]  J. Greene,et al.  Influence of Ar sputtering pressure on the adhesion of TiC films to steel substrates , 1975 .

[13]  L. Hultman,et al.  Mitigating the geometrical limitations of conventional sputtering by controlling the ion-to-neutral ratio during high power pulsed magnetron sputtering , 2011 .

[14]  J. Thornton.  The microstructure of sputter-deposited coatings , 1986 .

[15]  V. Poulek,et al.  Laser-stimulated growth of the εTi2N phase in TiN films during d.c. reactive magnetron sputter deposition , 1991 .

[16]  A. Kimura,et al.  Effects of Al content on hardness, lattice parameter and microstructure of Ti1-xAlxN films , 1999 .

[17]  R. Messier,et al.  Phase control of cubic boron nitride thin films , 1992 .

[18]  J. Greene,et al.  Mechanisms of the reactive‐ and chemical‐sputter deposition of TiO2 from Ti and TiC targets in mixed Ar+O2 discharges , 1979 .

[19]  Carl J. McHargue,et al.  The influence of ion bombardment on the adhesion of thin films to substrates , 1990 .

[20]  P. Sigmund.  Sputtering of single and multiple component materials , 1980 .

[21]  I. Petrov,et al.  Design and characterization of a compact two‐target ultrahigh vacuum magnetron sputter deposition system: Application to the growth of epitaxial Ti1−xAlxN alloys and TiN/Ti1−xAlxN superlattices , 1993 .

[22]  J. Schuster,et al.  The ternary system titanium-aluminum-nitrogen , 1984 .

[23]  J. Greene.  Thin Film Nucleation, Growth, and Microstructural Evolution: An Atomic Scale View , 2010 .

[24]  H. Satoh,et al.  Phase formation and characterization of hard coatings in the TiAlN system prepared by the cathodic arc ion plating method , 1991 .

[25]  I. Petrov,et al.  Growth of poly- and single-crystal ScN on MgO(001): Role of low-energy N2+ irradiation in determining texture, microstructure evolution, and mechanical properties , 1998 .

[26]  C. Mitterer,et al.  Structure, mechanical and tribological properties of sputtered Ti1–xAlxN coatings with 0.5≤x≤0.75 , 2005 .

[27]  R. C. Weast.  CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1973 .

[28]  Lars Hultman,et al.  Development of preferred orientation in polycrystalline TiN layers grown by ultrahigh vacuum reactive magnetron sputtering , 1995 .

[29]  J. Colligon,et al.  Radiation enhanced adhesion of thin films , 1989 .

[30]  J. Andersson,et al.  High power impulse magnetron sputtering : Current-voltage-time characteristics indicate the onset of sustained self-sputtering , 2007 .

[31]  J. Schneider,et al.  A novel pulsed magnetron sputter technique utilizing very high target power densities , 1999 .

[32]  I. Petrov,et al.  Role of Tin+ and Aln+ ion irradiation (n = 1, 2) during Ti1-xAlxN alloy film growth in a hybrid HIPIMS/magnetron mode , 2012 .

[33]  C. Mitterer,et al.  Interfaces in nanostructured thin films and their influence on hardness , 2005 .

[34]  L. Hultman,et al.  Time and energy resolved ion mass spectroscopy studies of the ion flux during high power pulsed magnetron sputtering of Cr in Ar and Ar/N2 atmospheres , 2010 .

[35]  I. Petrov,et al.  Epitaxial Sc1−xTixN(001): Optical and electronic transport properties , 2001 .

[36]  Lars Hultman,et al.  Crystal growth and microstructure of polycrystalline Ti1−xAlxN alloy films deposited by ultra-high-vacuum dual-target magnetron sputtering , 1993 .

[37]  J. Schneider,et al.  Ionized sputter deposition using an extremely high plasma density pulsed magnetron discharge , 2000 .

[38]  I. Petrov,et al.  Microstructure modification of TiN by ion bombardment during reactive sputter deposition , 1989 .

[39]  I. Petrov,et al.  Phase composition and microstructure of polycrystalline and epitaxial TaNx layers grown on oxidized Si(001) and MgO(001) by reactive magnetron sputter deposition , 2002 .

[40]  M. Odén,et al.  Thermal stability of arc evaporated high aluminum-content Ti1−xAlxN thin films , 2002 .

[41]  J. Nývlt.  Nucleation , 1991 .

[42]  T. C. Huang,et al.  Effect of ion bombardment during deposition on the x‐ray microstructure of thin silver films , 1985 .

[43]  I. Petrov,et al.  Metal versus rare-gas ion irradiation during Ti1−xAlxN film growth by hybrid high power pulsed magnetron/dc magnetron co-sputtering using synchronized pulsed substrate bias , 2012 .

[44]  I. Petrov,et al.  Growth of single-crystal CrN on MgO(001): Effects of low-energy ion-irradiation on surface morphological evolution and physical properties , 2002 .

[45]  G. Doughty.  Book reviewIon bombardment modification of surfaces: Edited by D. Auciello and R. Kelly , 1986 .

[46]  J. Gudmundsson.  Ionization mechanism in the high power impulse magnetron sputtering (HiPIMS) discharge , 2008 .

[47]  I. Petrov,et al.  Dense fully 111-textured TiN diffusion barriers: Enhanced lifetime through microstructure control during layer growth , 1999 .

[48]  Stephen M. Rossnagel,et al.  Gas density reduction effects in magnetrons , 1988 .

[49]  T. Hueber.  Thin Film Analysis By X Ray Scattering , 2016 .

[50]  L. Hultman,et al.  Microstructure control of CrNx films during high power impulse magnetron sputtering , 2010 .

[51]  J. Greene,et al.  Microstructure and physical properties of polycrystalline metastable Ti0.5Al0.5N alloys grown by d.c. magnetron sputter deposition , 1987 .

[52]  D. M. Mattox,et al.  Structure Modification by Ion Bombardment during Deposition , 1972 .

[53]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[54]  W. Münz,et al.  Structure and properties of high power impulse magnetron sputtering and DC magnetron sputtering CrN and TiN films deposited in an industrial scale unit , 2010 .

[55]  I. Petrov,et al.  Use of an externally applied axial magnetic field to control ion/neutral flux ratios incident at the substrate during magnetron sputter deposition , 1992 .

[56]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[57]  N. Lee,et al.  Low‐temperature Si(001) epitaxy using low‐energy (〈E 〉≂18 eV) Si atoms , 1994 .

[58]  H. Windischmann,et al.  Intrinsic stress in sputtered thin films , 1991 .

[59]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[60]  M. Ante,et al.  Interdependence between stress and texture in arc evaporated Ti-Al-N thin films , 2007 .

[61]  B. Alling,et al.  Electronic origin of the isostructural decomposition in cubic M1−xAlxN (M=Ti, Cr, Sc, Hf): A first-principles study , 2008 .

[62]  I. Petrov,et al.  Selection of metal ion irradiation for controlling Ti1-xAlxN alloy growth via hybrid HIPIMS/magnetron co-sputtering , 2012 .

[63]  I. Petrov,et al.  Effects of high‐flux low‐energy (20–100 eV) ion irradiation during deposition on the microstructure and preferred orientation of Ti0.5Al0.5N alloys grown by ultra‐high‐vacuum reactive magnetron sputtering , 1993 .

[64]  J. Alami,et al.  Advantages of nanocomposite coatings deposited by high power pulse magnetron sputtering technology , 2009 .

[65]  J. Jambor,et al.  Armstrongite from the Strange Lake Alkalic Complex, on the Quebec – Labrador Boundary, Canada , 1987, Powder Diffraction.

[66]  I. Petrov,et al.  Strain-free, single-phase metastable Ti0.38Al0.62N alloys with high hardness: metal-ion energy vs. momentum effects during film growth by hybrid high-power pulsed/dc magnetron cosputtering , 2014 .

[67]  Andrew G. Glen,et al.  APPL , 2001 .