Knowledge Management and Balanced Scorecard Outcomes: Exploring the Importance of Interpretation, Learning and Internationality

The topics of shared interpretation, organizational learning and firm internationalization have been studied extensively. Though considered important factors that shape the international competitive landscape, research synthesizing these interrelated areas has been limited to date. We use the balanced scorecard as a framework for assessing how organizational learning and sensemaking influence actions relating to a global marketing strategy and subsequent financial performance. Using data from 169 multinational corporations, findings indicate that a specific set of knowledge activities is related to balanced scorecard outcomes (e.g. customer performance, innovation and learning performance, and internal process performance). The hypothesized importance of customer performance is confirmed as the only balanced scorecard outcome significantly related to financial performance. A post hoc analysis revealed further insights for future research opportunities. Overall, these results suggest that firms can improve their competitive position by emphasizing shared interpretation within the organization and including balanced scorecard elements when assessing performance.

[1]  Daniel C. Bello,et al.  Drivers and Performance Outcomes of Trust in International Strategic Alliances: The Role of Organizational Complexity , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[2]  A. Saka‐Helmhout.  Unraveling Learning Within Multinational Corporations , 2007 .

[3]  G. Hedlund.  A model of knowledge management and the N‐form corporation , 2007 .

[4]  Rodney E. Smith,et al.  An Extension of the REA Framework to Support Balanced Scorecard Information Requirements , 2007, J. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[6]  C. Christopher Baughn,et al.  Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: An empirical study in Vietnam , 2006 .

[7]  M. Theodosiou,et al.  Strategy fit and performance consequences of international marketing standardization , 2006 .

[8]  Mark Easterby-Smith,et al.  Transferring Organizational Learning Systems to Japanese Subsidiaries in China , 2006 .

[9]  Bodo B. Schlegelmilch,et al.  Learning from foreign subsidiaries: An empirical investigation of headquarters' benefits from reverse knowledge transfers , 2006 .

[10]  H. Schoch,et al.  The Management of Information and Managers in Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations , 2006 .

[11]  Mitchell J. Lovett,et al.  How does financial performance affect marketing? Studying the marketing-finance relationship from a dynamic perspective , 2005 .

[12]  Stefan Schaltegger,et al.  The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard as a Framework for Eco‐efficiency Analysis , 2005 .

[13]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  Benchmarking Marketing Capabilities for Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 2005 .

[14]  Zahirul Hoque,et al.  A contingency model of the association between strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance measurement: Impact on organizational performance , 2004 .

[15]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  Antecedents of Export Venture Performance: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Assessment , 2004 .

[16]  Shmuel Ellis,et al.  Organizational Learning Mechanisms and Managers’ Perceived Uncertainty , 2003 .

[17]  Sengun Yeniyurt,et al.  A literature review and integrative performance measurement framework for multinational companies , 2003 .

[18]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  A Configuration Theory Assessment of Marketing Organization Fit with Business Strategy and Its Relationship with Marketing Performance , 2003 .

[19]  S. Tamer Cavusgil,et al.  The GMS: A Broad Conceptualization of Global Marketing Strategy and Its Effect on Firm Performance , 2002 .

[20]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  The balanced scorecard, competitive strategy, and performance , 2002 .

[21]  Paul R. Niven,et al.  Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results , 2002 .

[22]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[23]  K. Sivakumar,et al.  Instituting the marketing concept in a multinational setting: The role of national culture , 2001 .

[24]  Merja Mattila,et al.  Critical Aspects of Organizational Learning Research and Proposals for Its Measurement , 2001 .

[25]  Omar N. Toulan,et al.  Global Account Management in Multinational Corporations: Theory and Evidence , 2001 .

[26]  Stephanie Watts Sussman,et al.  Understanding Strategic Learning: Linking Organizational Learning, Knowledge Management, and Sensemaking , 2001 .

[27]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part II , 2001 .

[28]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Winning at new products : accelerating the process from idea to launch , 2001 .

[29]  E. Autio,et al.  Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability on International Growth , 2000 .

[30]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[31]  Kevin McCabe,et al.  Avoiding Competence Substitution Through Knowledge Sharing , 2000 .

[32]  W. Bogner,et al.  Making Sense in Hypercompetitive Environments: A Cognitive Explanation for the Persistence of High Velocity Competition , 2000 .

[33]  Peter C. Brewer,et al.  USING THE BALANCED SCORECARD TO MEASURE SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE. , 2000 .

[34]  Tasadduq A. Shervani,et al.  Marketing, Business Processes, and Shareholder Value: An Organizationally Embedded View of Marketing Activities and the Discipline of Marketing , 1999 .

[35]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework : From Intuition to Institution Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[36]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[37]  E. Ziegel,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard , 1998 .

[38]  M. Easterby-Smith.  Disciplines of Organizational Learning: Contributions and Critiques , 1997 .

[39]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity , 1997 .

[40]  Daniel C. Bello,et al.  The Effect of Output Controls, Process Controls, and Flexibility on Export Channel Performance , 1997 .

[41]  J. Spender.  Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[42]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[43]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Knowledge, Strategy, and the Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[44]  Leonidas C. Leonidou,et al.  The Export Development Process: An Integrative Review of Empirical Models , 1996 .

[45]  D. Ketchen,et al.  Process, Content and Context: Synergistic Effects on Organizational Performance , 1996 .

[46]  Ajay K. Kohli,et al.  Market Intelligence Dissemination across Functional Boundaries , 1996 .

[47]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[48]  H. Barkema,et al.  FOREIGN ENTRY, CULTURAL BARRIERS, AND LEARNING , 1996 .

[49]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action , 1996 .

[50]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[51]  C. Moorman.  Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes , 1995 .

[52]  John C. Narver,et al.  Market Orientation and the Learning Organization , 1995 .

[53]  George S. Yip,et al.  Exploiting globalization potential: U.S. and japanese strategies , 1994 .

[54]  G. Day.  The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .

[55]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  Toward a theory of international new ventures , 1994 .

[56]  James M. Sinkula.  Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning , 1994 .

[57]  S. Cavusgil,et al.  Marketing Strategy-Performance Relationship: An Investigation of the Empirical Link in Export Market Ventures , 1994 .

[58]  George S. Yip,et al.  EXPLOITING GLOBALIZATION POTENTIAL: U.S. , 1994 .

[59]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Markor: A Measure of Market Orientation , 1993 .

[60]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. , 1993, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[61]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[62]  L. Melin.  Internationalization as a strategy process , 1992 .

[63]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Monte Carlo Evaluations of Goodness of Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[64]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation , 1991 .

[65]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[66]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications , 1990 .

[67]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. , 1990 .

[68]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[69]  John C. Narver,et al.  The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability , 1990 .

[70]  S. Mulaik,et al.  EVALUATION OF GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDICES FOR STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS , 1989 .

[71]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Creation, Adoption and Diffusion of Innovations by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations , 1988 .

[72]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Environment, Structure, and Consensus in Strategy Formulation: A Conceptual Integration , 1987 .

[73]  James C. Anderson,et al.  An approach for confirmatory measurement and structural equation modeling of organizational properties , 1987 .

[74]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[75]  J. D. Couger.  E pluribus computum , 1986 .

[76]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[77]  G. Huber,et al.  Retrospective reports of strategic‐level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy , 1985 .

[78]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[79]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  Some Methods for Respecifying Measurement Models to Obtain Unidimensional Construct Measurement , 1982 .

[80]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. , 1982 .

[81]  William G. Egelhoff.  Strategy and Structure in Multinational Corporations: An Information- Processing Approach , 1982 .

[82]  Sydney Gregory,et al.  Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related values , 1982 .

[83]  A. Meyer.  Adapting to environmental jolts. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[84]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[85]  B. Hedberg.  How Organizations Learn and Unlearn , 1981 .

[86]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[87]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[88]  R. Tiwari,et al.  Who is (are) the author(s) , 1977 .

[89]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[90]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[91]  J. Child.  Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .