Open Innovation with Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping for Modeling the Barriers of University Technology Transfer: A Philippine Scenario

The University technology transfer (UTT) process is hindered by various barriers to achieving a successful translation of innovative technologies from universities to industries and other partners. Identifying these various barriers and understanding their interrelationships would provide a better understanding of the complex nature of the UTT process, which may be considered as inputs to crucial decision-making initiatives. This paper addresses this gap by holistically determining UTT barriers and their intertwined relationships. Using the Delphi method and fuzzy cognitive mapping, a case study in a state university in the Philippines was conducted to carry out this objective. The Delphi process extracts 24 relevant barriers of UTT, out of 46 barriers obtained from a comprehensive review of the extant literature. The results show that misalignment between research and commercialization objectives is the barrier that was influenced most by the other barriers. In contrast, high costs of managing joint research projects in terms of time and money and institutional bureaucracy have the highest out-degree measures or are the barriers that influence other barriers the most. These findings provide guidelines to various stakeholders and decision-makers in understanding the existence of barriers in the formulation of strategies and initiatives for a successful UTT process.

[1]  Weiping Wu,et al.  An evolving regional innovation network: collaboration among industry, university, and research institution in China’s first technology hub , 2019 .

[2]  Theofanis Gemtos,et al.  Yield prediction in apples using Fuzzy Cognitive Map learning approach , 2013 .

[3]  J. Yun,et al.  Entrepreneurial cyclical dynamics of open innovation , 2018, Journal of Evolutionary Economics.

[4]  Olaf P Jensen,et al.  Fuzzy cognitive mapping in support of integrated ecosystem assessments: Developing a shared conceptual model among stakeholders. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  David V. Gibson,et al.  Key variables in technology transfer: A field-study based empirical analysis , 1991 .

[6]  Giuseppina Passiante,et al.  A mechanism for sharing best practices between university technology transfer offices , 2017 .

[7]  Adam Mazurkiewicz,et al.  Technology Transfer Barriers and Challenges Faced by R&D Organisations , 2017 .

[8]  Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Differences in technology transfer between science-based and development based industries: transfer mechanisms and barriers , 2011 .

[9]  Steven Gray,et al.  Are coastal managers detecting the problem? Assessing stakeholder perception of climate vulnerability using Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping , 2014 .

[10]  Seymour Baron,et al.  Overcoming Barriers To Technology Transfer , 1990 .

[11]  J. Yun,et al.  The Effect of Open Innovation on Technology Value and Technology Transfer: A Comparative Analysis of the Automotive, Robotics, and Aviation Industries of Korea , 2018, Sustainability.

[12]  Gail A. Van Norman,et al.  Technology Transfer: From the Research Bench to Commercialization , 2017, JACC. Basic to translational science.

[13]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links , 2005 .

[14]  Paul O’Reilly,et al.  Enablers and barriers to university technology transfer engagements with small- and medium-sized enterprises: perspectives of Principal Investigators , 2017 .

[15]  A. Salter,et al.  Crossing the Rubicon: Exploring the Factors that Shape Academics Perceptions of the Barriers to Working with Industry , 2012 .

[16]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[17]  Nicholas S. Vonortas,et al.  Commercialization of transferred public technologies , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[18]  Alan Collier,et al.  Enablers and barriers to university and high technology SME partnerships , 2011 .

[19]  J. Berbegal‐Mirabent,et al.  Assessing the productivity of technology transfer offices: an analysis of the relevance of aspiration performance and portfolio complexity , 2019 .

[20]  Marina Dabić,et al.  The Croatian path from socialism to European membership through the lens of technology transfer policies , 2019, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[21]  Peter Brimble,et al.  University–Industry Linkages and Economic Development: The Case of Thailand , 2007 .

[22]  D. Sarpong,et al.  A comparative study of appropriateness and mechanisms of hard and soft technologies transfer , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[23]  J. Dilley,et al.  Identifying barriers to HIV testing: personal and contextual factors associated with late HIV testing , 2011, AIDS care.

[24]  Lei Wang,et al.  Effectiveness assessment of ship navigation safety countermeasures using fuzzy cognitive maps , 2019, Safety Science.

[25]  Carolin Plewa,et al.  What Drives and Inhibits University‐Business Cooperation in Europe? A Comprehensive Assessment , 2016 .

[26]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[27]  Rakesh D. Raut,et al.  Modelling the challenges to sustainability in the textile and apparel (T&A) sector: A Delphi-DEMATEL approach , 2018, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[28]  A. Link,et al.  Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. , 2004 .

[29]  Paolo Landoni,et al.  Organizational structures for external growth of University Technology Transfer Offices: An explorative analysis , 2017 .

[30]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[31]  I PapageorgiouElpiniki,et al.  A review of fuzzy cognitive maps in medicine , 2017 .

[32]  Liming Li,et al.  Complexity evolution of capital and technology transfer in climate negotiation , 2018, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul..

[33]  Genovaitė Liobikienė,et al.  University contributions to environmental sustainability: challenges and opportunities from the Lithuanian case , 2015 .

[34]  Ming-Lang Tseng,et al.  Modeling sustainable production indicators with linguistic preferences , 2013 .

[35]  Qian Shujing.  The Analysis on Barriers of Low Carbon Technology Transfer , 2012 .

[36]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  The Bayh-Dole Act and scientist entrepreneurship , 2011 .

[37]  Francesco Baldi,et al.  University technology transfer office business models: One size does not fit all , 2018, Technovation.

[38]  Gonzalo Nápoles,et al.  Two-steps learning of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for prediction and knowledge discovery on the HIV-1 drug resistance , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[39]  Harpalsinh Chudasama,et al.  Assessing impacts and community preparedness to cyclones: a fuzzy cognitive mapping approach , 2017, Climatic Change.

[40]  Evgenia Anagnostopoulou,et al.  Identifying barriers in the diffusion of renewable energy sources , 2015 .

[41]  Jan Youtie,et al.  The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effectiveness model , 2015 .

[42]  Chrystalla Kapetaniou,et al.  A framework for assessing the performance of universities: The case of Cyprus , 2017 .

[43]  Abdollah Amirkhani,et al.  A review of fuzzy cognitive maps in medicine: Taxonomy, methods, and applications , 2017, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[44]  M. Woolcock.  Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework , 1998 .

[45]  Yung-Chi Shen,et al.  Identifying the key barriers and their interrelationships impeding the university technology transfer in Taiwan: a multi-stakeholder perspective , 2017 .

[46]  Dixit Garg,et al.  Identification and evaluation of critical factors to technology transfer using AHP approach , 2015 .

[47]  Corrado lo Storto,et al.  Small Group Problem-Solving and Knowledge Creation: A Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Investigation , 2016 .

[48]  Ludovic-Alexandre Vidal,et al.  Using a Delphi process and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[49]  A. Salter,et al.  Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration , 2009 .

[50]  Michael A. Greiner,et al.  Barriers and Bridges for Successful Environmental Technology Transfer , 2003 .

[51]  Eleonora Bottani,et al.  Investigating the role of social media in polio prevention in India: a Delphi-DEMATEL approach , 2018, Kybernetes.

[52]  Alessandro Muscio,et al.  Perceived Obstacles to University–Industry Collaboration: Results from a Qualitative Survey of Italian Academic Departments , 2014 .

[53]  Per Erik Eriksson,et al.  Managing uncertainty and equivocality in joint process development projects , 2016 .

[54]  J. Yun,et al.  Micro- and Macro-Dynamics of Open Innovation with a Quadruple-Helix Model , 2019, Sustainability.

[55]  Hans-Horst Schröder,et al.  Integrating market and technological knowledge in the fuzzy front end: an FCM-based action support system , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[56]  Magnus Klofsten,et al.  Creating a bridge between university and industry in small European countries: the role of the Industrial Liaison Office , 1999 .

[57]  Réjean Landry,et al.  “The Triple-Helix collaboration: Why do researchers collaborate with industry and the government? What are the factors that influence the perceived barriers?” , 2007, Scientometrics.

[58]  Uygar Özesmi,et al.  Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach , 2004 .

[59]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Triple Helix innovation in China’s dye-sensitized solar cell industry: hybrid methods with semantic TRIZ and technology roadmapping , 2013, Scientometrics.

[60]  Tugrul U. Daim,et al.  Technology roadmap through fuzzy cognitive map-based scenarios: the case of wind energy sector of a developing country , 2016, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[61]  Andrzej H. Jasiński,et al.  Barriers for technology transfer: the case of a country in transition , 2009 .

[62]  S. Arora,et al.  Using web mining to explore Triple Helix influences on growth in small and mid-size firms , 2016, Technovation.

[63]  Nicholas S. Vonortas,et al.  Evolution of university-industry collaboration in Brazil from a technology upgrading perspective , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[64]  Lanndon A. Ocampo,et al.  Development of a sustainable manufacturing strategy using analytic network process , 2016 .

[65]  Simon Mosey,et al.  Creating network bridges for university technology transfer: The medici fellowship programme , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[66]  Creso M. Sá,et al.  Faculties of education and institutional strategies for knowledge mobilization: an exploratory study , 2011 .

[67]  Mohd. Zaidi Omar,et al.  University-industry Collaboration Models in Malaysia☆ , 2013 .

[68]  Paola Giuri,et al.  The strategic orientation of universities in knowledge transfer activities , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[69]  A. Messeni Petruzzelli,et al.  University–Industry collaborations and international knowledge spillovers: a joint-patent investigation , 2020, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[70]  Tommy Dalgaard,et al.  Can fuzzy cognitive mapping help in agricultural policy design and communication , 2015 .