A Model of Symmetry Breaking in Collective Decision-Making

Symmetry breaking is commonly found in self-organized collective decision making. It serves an important functional role, specifically in biological and bio-inspired systems. The analysis of symmetry breaking is thus an important key to understanding self-organized decision making. However, in many systems of practical importance available analytic methods cannot be applied due to the complexity of the scenario and consequentially the model. This applies specifically to self-organization in bio-inspired engineering. We propose a new modeling approach which allows us to formally analyze important properties of such processes. The core idea of our approach is to infer a compact model based on stochastic processes for a one-dimensional symmetry parameter. This enables us to analyze the fundamental properties of even complex collective decision making processes via Fokker-Planck theory. We are able to quantitatively address the effectiveness of symmetry breaking, the stability, the time taken to reach a consensus, and other parameters. This is demonstrated with two examples from swarm robotics.

[1]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Thomas Schmickl,et al.  Spatial macroscopic models of a bio-inspired robotic swarm algorithm , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[3]  Gérard Weisbuch,et al.  Hits and flops dynamics , 2000 .

[4]  K. Vahala Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences , 1986, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

[5]  A. Dussutour,et al.  Noise improves collective decision-making by ants in dynamic environments , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Serge Kernbach,et al.  Get in touch: cooperative decision making based on robot-to-robot collisions , 2009, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[7]  Tamas Vicsek,et al.  A question of scale , 2001, Nature.

[8]  Serge Kernbach,et al.  Re-embodiment of Honeybee Aggregation Behavior in an Artificial Micro-Robotic System , 2009, Adapt. Behav..

[9]  Thomas Schmickl,et al.  Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Analysis of Emergent Symmetry Breaking in Collective Decision Making , 2010 .

[10]  Thomas Schmickl,et al.  Beeclust: A Swarm Algorithm Derived from Honeybees Derivation of the Algorithm, Analysis by Mathematical Models and Implementation on a Robot Swarm , 2011 .

[11]  Heinz Wörn,et al.  Embodied Computation , 2007, Parallel Process. Lett..

[12]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Self-Organization in Biological Systems , 2001, Princeton studies in complexity.

[13]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  The biological principles of swarm intelligence , 2007, Swarm Intelligence.

[14]  Audrey Dussutour,et al.  Noise-Induced Adaptive Decision-Making in Ant-Foraging , 2008, SAB.

[15]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Modulation of individual behavior and collective decision-making during aggregation site selection by the ant Messor barbarus , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  Nicola C. Reading,et al.  Quorum sensing: the many languages of bacteria. , 2006, FEMS microbiology letters.

[17]  George N. Reeke,et al.  BOOK REVIEW: "SELF-ORGANIZATION IN BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS" BY S. CAMAZINE, J. DENEUBOURG, N. R. FRANKS, J. SNEYD, G. THERAULAZ AND E. BONABEAU , 2002 .

[18]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Emerging patterns and food recruitment in ants: an analytical study , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.