NeuroImage: Clinical

Background Machine learning techniques such as support vector machine (SVM) have been applied recently in order to accurately classify individuals with neuropsychiatric disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) based on neuroimaging data. However, the multivariate nature of the SVM approach often precludes the identification of the brain regions that contribute most to classification accuracy. Multiple kernel learning (MKL) is a sparse machine learning method that allows the identification of the most relevant sources for the classification. By parcelating the brain into regions of interest (ROI) it is possible to use each ROI as a source to MKL (ROI-MKL). Methods We applied MKL to multimodal neuroimaging data in order to: 1) compare the diagnostic performance of ROI-MKL and whole-brain SVM in discriminating patients with AD from demographically matched healthy controls and 2) identify the most relevant brain regions to the classification. We used two atlases (AAL and Brodmann's) to parcelate the brain into ROIs and applied ROI-MKL to structural (T1) MRI, 18F-FDG-PET and regional cerebral blood flow SPECT (rCBF-SPECT) data acquired from the same subjects (20 patients with early AD and 18 controls). In ROI-MKL, each ROI received a weight (ROI-weight) that indicated the region's relevance to the classification. For each ROI, we also calculated whether there was a predominance of voxels indicating decreased or increased regional activity (for 18F-FDG-PET and rCBF-SPECT) or volume (for T1-MRI) in AD patients. Results Compared to whole-brain SVM, the ROI-MKL approach resulted in better accuracies (with either atlas) for classification using 18F-FDG-PET (92.5% accuracy for ROI-MKL versus 84% for whole-brain), but not when using rCBF-SPECT or T1-MRI. Although several cortical and subcortical regions contributed to discrimination, high ROI-weights and predominance of hypometabolism and atrophy were identified specially in medial parietal and temporo-limbic cortical regions. Also, the weight of discrimination due to a pattern of increased voxel-weight values in AD individuals was surprisingly high (ranging from approximately 20% to 40% depending on the imaging modality), located mainly in primary sensorimotor and visual cortices and subcortical nuclei. Conclusion The MKL-ROI approach highlights the high discriminative weight of a subset of brain regions of known relevance to AD, the selection of which contributes to increased classification accuracy when applied to 18F-FDG-PET data. Moreover, the MKL-ROI approach demonstrates that brain regions typically spared in mild stages of AD also contribute substantially in the individual discrimination of AD patients from controls.

[1]  Guy B. Williams,et al.  Registration accuracy for VBM studies varies according to region and degenerative disease grouping , 2010, NeuroImage.

[2]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A multiple kernel learning approach to perform classification of groups from complex-valued fMRI data analysis: Application to schizophrenia , 2014, NeuroImage.

[3]  M. Folstein,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease , 1984, Neurology.

[4]  H. Benali,et al.  Support vector machine-based classification of Alzheimer’s disease from whole-brain anatomical MRI , 2009, Neuroradiology.

[5]  B. Långström,et al.  The use of PET in Alzheimer disease , 2010, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[6]  H. Matsuda Voxel-based Morphometry of Brain MRI in Normal Aging and Alzheimer's Disease. , 2013, Aging and disease.

[7]  Danilo P. Mandic,et al.  A generalized normalized gradient descent algorithm , 2004, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[8]  A. Dale,et al.  Alzheimer disease: quantitative structural neuroimaging for detection and prediction of clinical and structural changes in mild cognitive impairment. , 2009, Radiology.

[9]  S. de Santi,et al.  Pre-clinical detection of Alzheimer's disease using FDG-PET, with or without amyloid imaging. , 2010, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[10]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Mapping hippocampal and ventricular change in Alzheimer disease , 2004, NeuroImage.

[11]  H. Braak,et al.  Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes , 2004, Acta Neuropathologica.

[12]  Jean-Claude Baron,et al.  Detecting hippocampal hypometabolism in Mild Cognitive Impairment using automatic voxel-based approaches , 2007, NeuroImage.

[13]  S Lehéricy,et al.  VBM anticipates the rate of progression of Alzheimer disease , 2008, Neurology.

[14]  C. Rorden,et al.  Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. , 2000, Behavioural neurology.

[15]  Emma J. Burton,et al.  A comprehensive study of gray matter loss in patients with Alzheimer’s disease using optimized voxel-based morphometry , 2003, NeuroImage.

[16]  Kuncheng Li,et al.  Voxel-based assessment of gray and white matter volumes in Alzheimer's disease , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  C R Jack,et al.  Serial MRI and CSF biomarkers in normal aging, MCI, and AD , 2010, Neurology.

[18]  Rachel L. Mistur,et al.  FDG-PET changes in brain glucose metabolism from normal cognition to pathologically verified Alzheimer’s disease , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[19]  Karl Herholz,et al.  18F-FDG PET and Perfusion SPECT in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer and Lewy Body Dementias , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  M N Cantwell,et al.  Does cerebral blood flow decline in healthy aging? A PET study with partial-volume correction. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  Klemens Scheidhauer,et al.  Statistical Parametric Mapping of 99mTc-HMPAO-SPECT Images for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease: Normalizing to Cerebellar Tracer Uptake , 2002, NeuroImage.

[22]  S. Black,et al.  Functional correlates of instrumental activities of daily living in mild Alzheimer's disease , 2012, Neurobiology of Aging.

[23]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer's disease. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  C. Buchpiguel,et al.  Voxel-based investigations of regional cerebral blood flow abnormalities in Alzheimer's disease using a single-detector SPECT system. , 2007, Clinics.

[25]  K. Ishii PET Approaches for Diagnosis of Dementia , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[26]  Kengo Ito,et al.  Effects of imaging modalities, brain atlases and feature selection on prediction of Alzheimer's disease , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods , 2000, NeuroImage.

[29]  C. Svarer,et al.  Integrated software for the analysis of brain PET/SPECT studies with partial-volume-effect correction. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  David Dagan Feng,et al.  Automated Identification of Dementia Using FDG-PET Imaging , 2014, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[31]  Hiroshi Matsuda,et al.  Role of Neuroimaging in Alzheimer's Disease, with Emphasis on Brain Perfusion SPECT* , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  J. Morris,et al.  The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease , 2011, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[33]  J. Price,et al.  Cerebral amyloid deposition and diffuse plaques in ``normal'' aging , 1996, Neurology.

[34]  S. Resnick,et al.  Detection of prodromal Alzheimer's disease via pattern classification of magnetic resonance imaging , 2008, Neurobiology of Aging.

[35]  R. Buchert,et al.  Multimodal prediction of conversion to Alzheimer's disease based on incomplete biomarkers∗ , 2015, Alzheimer's & dementia.

[36]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  A hybrid approach to the Skull Stripping problem in MRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[37]  A. Chincarini,et al.  Volume of interest-based [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET discriminates MCI converting to Alzheimer's disease from healthy controls. A European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC) study , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[38]  Jianping Yin,et al.  Multiple Kernel Learning in the Primal for Multimodal Alzheimer’s Disease Classification , 2013, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[39]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  Juan M. Górriz,et al.  Automatic ROI Selection in Structural Brain MRI Using SOM 3D Projection , 2014, PloS one.

[41]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  Clinical Value of Neuroimaging in the Diagnosis of Dementia. Sensitivity and Specificity of Regional Cerebral Metabolic and Other Parameters for Early Identification of Alzheimer's Disease. , 1999, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.

[42]  Vikas Singh,et al.  MKL for Robust Multi-modality AD Classification , 2009, MICCAI.

[43]  A. Delacourte,et al.  The biochemical pathway of neurofibrillary degeneration in aging and Alzheimer’s disease , 1999, Neurology.

[44]  C. Buchpiguel,et al.  Age-Related Metabolic Profiles in Cognitively Healthy Elders: Results from a Voxel-Based [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose–Positron-Emission Tomography Study with Partial Volume Effects Correction , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[45]  Luiz Kobuti Ferreira,et al.  Neuroimaging in Alzheimer's disease: current role in clinical practice and potential future applications , 2011, Clinics.

[46]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  A statistical framework for genomic data fusion , 2004, Bioinform..

[47]  R. Vandenberghe,et al.  Amyloid positron emission tomography with 18F-flutemetamol and structural magnetic resonance imaging in the classification of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease , 2013, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[48]  N. Foster,et al.  Metabolic reduction in the posterior cingulate cortex in very early Alzheimer's disease , 1997, Annals of neurology.

[49]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Cortical thickness and voxel-based morphometry in posterior cortical atrophy and typical Alzheimer's disease , 2011, Neurobiology of Aging.

[50]  G. Busatto,et al.  Voxel-based morphometry in Alzheimer’s disease , 2008, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.

[51]  Bin Hu,et al.  A review of structural and functional brain networks: small world and atlas , 2015, Brain Informatics.

[52]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Multimodal classification of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment , 2011, NeuroImage.

[53]  C. Jack,et al.  Serial MRI and CSF biomarkers in normal aging, MCI and Alzheimer's disease , 2010, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[54]  Constantinos Kallis,et al.  Reply: A plea for confidence intervals and consideration of generalizability in diagnostic studies. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[55]  D. Silverman Brain 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative dementias: comparison with perfusion SPECT and with clinical evaluations lacking nuclear imaging. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[56]  K. Brodmann Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Großhirnrinde : in ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues , 1985 .

[57]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Imaging of onset and progression of Alzheimer's disease with voxel-compression mapping of serial magnetic resonance images , 2001, The Lancet.

[58]  Antonio Greco,et al.  Potential neuroimaging biomarkers of pathologic brain changes in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review , 2016, BMC Geriatrics.

[59]  Janet B W Williams Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[60]  M. Albert,et al.  MRI measures of temporoparietal regions show differential rates of atrophy during prodromal AD , 2008, Neurology.

[61]  Marie Chupin,et al.  Automatic classi fi cation of patients with Alzheimer ' s disease from structural MRI : A comparison of ten methods using the ADNI database , 2010 .

[62]  J. Morris The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) , 1993, Neurology.

[63]  Bernhard E. Boser,et al.  A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers , 1992, COLT '92.

[64]  Takashi Asada,et al.  Voxel-based morphometry to discriminate early Alzheimer's disease from controls , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[65]  John Ashburner,et al.  A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm , 2007, NeuroImage.

[66]  Maity Gouranga,et al.  COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF , 2018 .

[67]  Janaina Mourão Miranda,et al.  PRoNTo: Pattern Recognition for Neuroimaging Toolbox , 2013, Neuroinformatics.

[68]  Kengo Ito,et al.  A comparison of three brain atlases for MCI prediction , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[69]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[70]  E. Walker,et al.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[71]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[72]  John Shawe-Taylor,et al.  SCoRS—A Method Based on Stability for Feature Selection and Mapping in Neuroimaging , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[73]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Brain imaging in Alzheimer disease. , 2012, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine.

[74]  Griselda J. Garrido,et al.  A voxel-based morphometry study of temporal lobe gray matter reductions in Alzheimer’s disease , 2003, Neurobiology of Aging.