Data envelopment analysis based comparison of two hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approaches for mobile phone selection: a case study in Iranian telecommunication environment

The arrival of the mobile phone and its rapid and widespread growth may well be seen as one of the most significant developments in the fields of communication and information technology over the past two decades. The aim of this study is to compare two hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches to evaluate the mobile phone options with respect to user's preferences. Firstly, we identify the most desirable features influencing the choice of a mobile phone. This is realised through a survey conducted among the target group, the experiences of the telecommunication sector experts and the studies in the literature. Secondly, two MCDM methods are used in the evaluation procedure. More precisely, two hybrid methods 'analytic hierarchy process-voting analytic hierarchy process (AHP-VAHP) and AHP-entropy-technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS)' are compared in ranking the mobile phone alternatives. A case study is made at a telecommunication centre in Iran to investigate both techniques. Considering the same ranking of the two methods, the numerical results are evaluated using data envelopment analysis to identify the most beneficial method.

[1]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  Evaluation of multicultural factors from elicited customer requirements for new product development , 2003 .

[2]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  A test of the technology acceptance model: the case of cellular telephone adoption , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[3]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives , 2007, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[4]  Terhi-Anna Wilska,et al.  Mobile Phone Use as Part of Young People's Consumption Styles , 2003 .

[5]  Brian G. Kingsman,et al.  Vendor rating for an entrepreneur development programme: a case study using the analytic hierarchy process method , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[6]  V. M. Rao Tummala,et al.  An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system , 2001 .

[7]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[8]  Tracy Callaway Russo,et al.  The cocial construction of mobile telephony: an application of the social influence model to perceptions and uses of mobile phones within personal communication networks , 2003 .

[9]  Kristen L. Macuga,et al.  Predicting the effects of cellular-phone dialing on driver performance , 2002, Cognitive Systems Research.

[10]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A comparative site evaluation study for relocating Japanese government agencies out of Tokyo , 2003 .

[11]  Shang H. Hsu,et al.  Perceptual factors underlying user preferences toward product form of mobile phones , 2001 .

[12]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[13]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver , 2002 .

[14]  H. Joseph Wen,et al.  Consumer-based m-commerce: exploring consumer perception of mobile applications , 2005, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[15]  Tonya L. Smith-Jackson,et al.  Systematic evaluation methodology for cell phone user interfaces , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[16]  S. Han,et al.  A systematic approach for coupling user satisfaction with product design , 2003, Ergonomics.

[17]  J. Funk.  The future of the mobile phone Internet: an analysis of technological trajectories and lead users in the Japanese market , 2005 .

[18]  C. Feng,et al.  Performance evaluation for airlines including the consideration of financial ratios , 2000 .

[19]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  User-oriented design for the optimal combination on product design , 2006 .

[20]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  Do size and structure matter to mobile users? An empirical study of the effects of screen size, information structure, and task complexity on user activities with standard web phones , 2004, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[21]  Myung Hwan Yun,et al.  Identifying mobile phone design features critical to user satisfaction , 2004 .

[22]  Kumiko Aoki,et al.  An analysis of young people's use of and attitudes toward cell phones , 2003, Telematics Informatics.

[23]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[24]  Tony Charlton,et al.  Mobile phone ownership and usage among pre-adolescents , 2004, Telematics Informatics.

[25]  Sheng-Hshiung Tsaur,et al.  The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. , 2002 .

[26]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Going wireless: behavior & practice of new mobile phone users , 2000, CSCW '00.

[27]  Constantin Zopounidis,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Aid Classification Methods , 2002 .

[28]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .