Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal: A longitudinal case study

The study analyses how students' growing understanding of the topic and search experience were related to their choice of search tactics and terms while preparing a research proposal for a small empirical study. In addition to that, the findings of the study are used to test Vakkari's (2001) theory of task-based IR. The research subjects were 22 students of psychology attending a seminar for preparing the proposal. They made a search for their task in PsychINFO database at the beginning and end of the seminar. Data were collected in several ways. A pre- and post-search interview was conducted in both sessions. The students were asked to think aloud in the sessions. This was recorded as were the transaction logs. The results show that search experience was slightly related to the change of facets. Although the students' vocabulary of the topic grew generating an increased use of specific terms between the sessions, their use of search tactics and operators remained fairly constant. There was no correlation between the terms and tactics used and the total number of useful references found. By comparing these results with the findings of relevant earlier studies the conclusion was drawn that domain knowledge has an impact on searching assuming that users have a sufficient command of the system used. This implies that the tested theory of task-based IR is valid on condition that the searchers are experienced. It is suggested that the theory should be enriched by including search experience in its scope.

[1]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Students' cognition and information searching while preparing a research proposal , 2002 .

[2]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Changes in relevance criteria and problem stages in task performance , 2000, J. Documentation.

[3]  Marilyn Domas White,et al.  The Communications Behavior of Academic Economists in Research Phases , 1975, The Library Quarterly.

[4]  Barbara M. Wildemuth,et al.  A Detailed Analysis of End-User Search Behaviors. , 1991 .

[5]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Task-based information searching , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Paul B. Kantor,et al.  A Study of Information Seeking and Retrieving. III. Searchers, Searches, and Overlap* , 1988 .

[7]  Louise T. Su.  The Relevance of Recall and Precision in User Evaluation , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study , 2001, J. Documentation.

[9]  Alistair Sutcliffe,et al.  Empirical studies of end-user information searching , 2000 .

[10]  S. Yang.  Information Seeking as Problem-Solving Using a Qualitative Approach To Uncover the Novice Learners' Information-Seeking Processes in a Perseus Hypertext System. , 1997 .

[11]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Cognitive Perspectives of Information Retrieval Interaction: Elements of a Cognitive IR Theory , 1996, J. Documentation.

[12]  F. Suppe.  The semantic conception of theories and scientific realism , 1989 .

[13]  Paul Solomon,et al.  Toward an Understanding of the Dynamics of Relevance Judgment: An Analysis of One Person's Search Behavior , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..

[14]  Alistair G. Sutcliffe,et al.  Towards a cognitive theory of information retrieval , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[15]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface , 1989 .

[16]  Winifred Sewell,et al.  Observations of end-user online searching behavior over eleven years , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[17]  M. Kuokkanen,et al.  The growth of sociological theories , 1994 .

[18]  Charles P. Friedman,et al.  Medical students' personal knowledge, searching proficiency, and database use in problem solving , 1995 .

[19]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? , 1990, Inf. Process. Manag..

[20]  Raya Fidel.  Searchers' selection of search keys: III. Searching styles , 1991 .

[21]  Fabio Crestani,et al.  Information Retrieval by Logical Imaging , 1995, J. Documentation.

[22]  Barbara Fister,et al.  The Research Processes of Undergraduate Students. , 1992 .

[23]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Cognition and changes of search terms and tactics during task performance: A longitudinal case study , 2000, RIAO.

[24]  Robin Jeffries,et al.  Orienteering in an information landscape: how information seekers get from here to there , 1993, INTERCHI.

[25]  W. D. Garvey.  Communication, the essence of science , 1979 .

[26]  Amanda Spink,et al.  From Highly Relevant to Not Relevant: Examining Different Regions of Relevance , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..

[27]  Judy Bateman.  Changes in Relevance Criteria: A Longitudinal Study. , 1998 .

[28]  Stefano Mizzaro,et al.  Evaluating user interfaces to information retrieval systems: a case study on user support , 1996, SIGIR '96.

[29]  Peiling Wang.  Users' information needs at different stages of a research project: a cognitive view , 1997 .

[30]  Ingrid Hsieh-Yee,et al.  Effects of Search Experience and Subject Knowledge on the Search Tactics of Novice and Experienced Searchers. , 1993 .

[31]  A. Stinchcombe.  Constructing Social Theories , 1970 .

[32]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Information Seeking in Electronic Environments , 1995 .