Convex order and comonotonic conditional mean risk sharing

Using a standard reduction argument based on conditional expectations, this paper argues that risk sharing is always beneficial (with respect to convex order or second degree stochastic dominance) provided the risk-averse agents share the total losses appropriately (whatever the distribution of the losses, their correlation structure and individual degrees of risk aversion). Specifically, all agents hand their individual losses over to a pool and each of them is liable for the conditional expectation of his own loss given the total loss of the pool. We call this risk sharing mechanism the conditional mean risk sharing. If all the conditional expectations involved are non-decreasing functions of the total loss then the conditional mean risk sharing is shown to be Pareto-optimal. Explicit expressions for the individual contributions to the pool are derived in some special cases of interest: independent and identically distributed losses, comonotonic losses, and mutually exclusive losses. In particular, conditions under which this payment rule leads to a comonotonic risk sharing are examined.

[1]  I. Meilijson,et al.  Modelling agents’ preferences in complete markets by second order stochastic dominance , 2003 .

[2]  Ragnar Norberg,et al.  Power tailed ruin probabilities in the presence of risky investments , 2002 .

[3]  M. Denuit,et al.  Lorenz and excess-wealth orders, with applications in reinsurance theory , 1999 .

[4]  Jan Dhaene,et al.  Risk Measures and Comonotonicity: A Review , 2006, Stochastic Models.

[5]  Ludger Rüschendorf,et al.  On comonotonicity of Pareto optimal risk sharing , 2008 .

[6]  Johannes Leitner BALAYAGE MONOTONOUS RISK MEASURES , 2004 .

[7]  Isaac Meilijson,et al.  Co-monotone allocations, Bickel-Lehmann dispersion and the Arrow-Pratt measure of risk aversion , 1994, Ann. Oper. Res..

[8]  Johannes Leitner Dilatation monotonous Choquet integrals , 2005 .

[9]  Jan Dhaene,et al.  The safest dependence structure among risks , 1999 .

[10]  Michel Denuit,et al.  Optimal reinsurance and stop-loss order , 1998 .

[11]  M. Goovaerts,et al.  Decision principles derived from risk measures , 2010 .

[12]  B. Efron Increasing Properties of Polya Frequency Function , 1965 .

[13]  K. Borch Equilibrium in a Reinsurance Market , 1962 .

[14]  Collin Carbno,et al.  Actuarial Theory for Dependent Risks: Measures, Orders, and Models , 2007, Technometrics.

[15]  Jan Dhaene,et al.  The Concept of Comonotonicity in Actuarial Science and Finance: Applications , 2002 .

[16]  Stochastic Orders , 2008 .

[17]  K. Borch,et al.  The safety loading of reinsurance premiums , 1960 .

[18]  T. Liggett Monotonicity of conditional distributions and growth models on trees , 2000 .

[19]  Michel Denuit,et al.  Actuarial Theory for Dependent Risks: Measures, Orders and Models , 2005 .

[20]  Jan Dhaene,et al.  The Concept of Comonotonicity in Actuarial Science and Finance: Theory , 2002, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics.