Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Saquinavir Hard-Gel/Ritonavir/Fosamprenavir in HIV-1–Infected Patients

Background:In vitro synergy and complementary resistance profiles provide a strong rationale for combining fosamprenavir with saquinavir as part of a potent double-boosted protease inhibitor regimen. This study evaluated the steady-state pharmacokinetics of saquinavir 1000 mg twice daily (bid) and fosamprenavir 700 mg bid administered with 2 different doses of ritonavir (100 and 200 mg bid) in HIV-1–infected subjects. Methods:On day 1, 12-hour pharmacokinetic profiles for saquinavir/ritonavir (1000/100 mg bid) were obtained for 18 subjects. All subjects were receiving ongoing treatment with a saquinavir/ritonavir-containing regimen. Fosamprenavir 700 mg bid was then added to the regimen, and pharmacokinetic sampling was repeated for all 3 agents at day 11. The ritonavir daily dose was then increased to 200 mg bid, and a 3rd pharmacokinetic profile was obtained at day 22. Results:The coadministration of fosamprenavir 700 mg bid with saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg bid resulted in a statistically nonsignificant decrease in saquinavir concentrations (by 14, 9, and 24%, for saquinavir area under the concentration–time curve [AUC]0–12, Cmax, and Ctrough, respectively). This was compensated for by an increased ritonavir dose of 200 mg bid, which resulted in a statistically nonsignificant increase in saquinavir exposure compared with baseline. Amprenavir levels did not appear to be significantly influenced by coadministration of saquinavir with fosamprenavir. Fosamprenavir significantly reduced ritonavir exposure, but the increased ritonavir dose compensated for this interaction. Conclusions:Our findings showed that saquinavir/ritonavir/fosamprenavir was well tolerated over the study period. Saquinavir plasma concentrations were slightly lowered by the addition of fosamprenavir to the regimen. However, the addition of a further 100 mg ritonavir bid restored the small and insignificant decrease.

[1]  R. Paredes,et al.  Role of structured treatment interruption before a 5-drug salvage antiretroviral regimen: the Retrogene Study. , 2003, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[2]  Z. Fox,et al.  Randomized trial to evaluate indinavir/ritonavir versus saquinavir/ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients: the MaxCmin1 Trial. , 2003, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[3]  C. Kovacs,et al.  Clinical Impact of Double Protease Inhibitor Boosting with Lopinavir/Ritonavir and Amprenavir as Part of Salvage Antiretroviral Therapy , 2003, HIV clinical trials.

[4]  W. Rozenbaum,et al.  High Variability of Plasma Drug Concentrations in Dual Protease Inhibitor Regimens , 2003, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[5]  C. Goujard,et al.  Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Amprenavir Coadministered with Ritonavir in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected Patients , 2003, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[6]  G. Plosker,et al.  Saquinavir: a review of its use in boosted regimens for treating HIV infection. , 2003, Drugs.

[7]  R. Shafer,et al.  Drug resistance mutations in HIV-1. , 2003, Topics in HIV medicine : a publication of the International AIDS Society, USA.

[8]  Victor DeGruttola,et al.  Dual vs single protease inhibitor therapy following antiretroviral treatment failure: a randomized trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[9]  B. Sadler,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulations of Interaction of Amprenavir and Ritonavir , 2002, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[10]  C. Leport,et al.  Amprenavir Inhibitory Quotient and Virological Response in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients on an Amprenavir-Containing Salvage Regimen without or with Ritonavir , 2002, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[11]  S. Mauss,et al.  Unfavourable interaction of amprenavir and lopinavir in combination with ritonavir? , 2002, AIDS.

[12]  R. Haubrich,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Study of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Protease Inhibitors Used in Combination with Amprenavir , 2001, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[13]  B. Sadler,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and safety of amprenavir and ritonavir following multiple-dose, co-administration to healthy volunteers , 2001, AIDS.

[14]  J. Polli,et al.  Induction of P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 3A by HIV protease inhibitors. , 2001, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[15]  M. Saag,et al.  Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Regimens of Soft-Gel Capsule Saquinavir plus Minidose Ritonavir in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Negative Adults , 2000, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[16]  D. Greenblatt,et al.  Potent mechanism-based inhibition of human CYP3A in vitro by amprenavir and ritonavir: comparison with ketoconazole , 2000, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[17]  R Rode,et al.  Ritonavir and saquinavir combination therapy for the treatment of HIV infection. , 1999, AIDS.

[18]  C. Decker,et al.  Metabolism of amprenavir in liver microsomes: role of CYP3A4 inhibition for drug interactions. , 1998, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[19]  J. Leonard,et al.  Pharmacokinetic interactions between two human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors, ritonavir and saquinavir * , 1998, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[20]  B. Sadler,et al.  In vitro antiviral activity of 141W94 (VX-478) in combination with other antiretroviral agents. , 1996, Antiviral research.