Emergent representations, interaction theory and the cognitive force of metaphor

We focus here on the problem of how new representations emerge through a cognitive agent’s interaction with the environment. We address this problem within a framework where representation-building mechanisms operate to create new representations against a backdrop of existing representations, and argue that novel and creative metaphors in any language provide a prime example of this phenomenon. Our approach to modeling the emergence of representation integrates ideas from three different streams of research: (1) the interaction theory of metaphor proposed by Black and others to account for the creativity of metaphors; (2) gestalt theories of perception; and (3) contemporary research supporting a constructivist and action-oriented view of perception and cognition. Combining these insights together, we outline our Gestalt projection model, and discuss three different ways in which new representations might emerge through metaphors. Finally, we propose that metaphor may be viewed as a cognitive force through which a cognitive agent asserts its

[1]  N. Maier Reasoning in humans. II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. , 1931 .

[2]  J. Piaget The construction of reality in the child , 1954 .

[3]  Bipin Indurkhya,et al.  Analogical projection in pattern perception , 2003, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[4]  E. Spelke,et al.  Object permanence in five-month-old infants , 1985, Cognition.

[5]  J. Glicksohn,et al.  Metaphor and gestalt: interaction theory revisited , 1993 .

[6]  R. Kimchi,et al.  Perceptual organization in vision : behavioral and neural perspectives , 2003 .

[7]  M. Black Models and metaphors , 1962 .

[8]  M. Wertheimer Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II , 1923 .

[9]  R. A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence without Representation , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[10]  C. Turbayne The Myth Of Metaphor , 1964 .

[11]  C. Hausman,et al.  Metaphor and art : interactionism and reference in the verbal and nonverbal arts , 1991 .

[12]  Bipin Indurkhya,et al.  On Creation of Features and Change of Representation , 1998 .

[13]  Barbara I. Holstein Use of Metaphor to Induce Innovative Thinking in Fourth Grade Children. , 1972 .

[14]  W. Köhler The Mentality of Apes. , 2018, Nature.

[15]  Jacob Bronowski,et al.  The Visionary Eye: Essays in the Arts, Literature and Science , 1978 .

[16]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Mental Imagery in Interpreting Poetic Metaphor , 1999 .

[17]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  The Hearsay-II Speech-Understanding System: Integrating Knowledge to Resolve Uncertainty , 1980, CSUR.

[18]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[19]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[20]  Mark H. Bickhard,et al.  Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science - impasse and solution , 1995, Advances in psychology.

[21]  K. Koffka Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[22]  H. Penny Nii,et al.  Blackboard systems: the blackboard model of problem solving and the evolution of blackboard architectures , 1995 .

[23]  Gerard J. Steen,et al.  Understanding Metaphor in Literature: An Empirical Approach , 1994 .

[24]  S. Ullman Visual routines , 1984, Cognition.

[25]  B. Indurkhya Metaphor and Cognition: An Interactionist Approach , 1992 .

[26]  B. Indurkhya,et al.  Emergence of Features in Metaphor Comprehension , 2000 .

[27]  David J. Chalmers,et al.  High-level perception, representation, and analogy: a critique of artificial intelligence methodology , 1992, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[28]  K. Duncker,et al.  On problem-solving , 1945 .

[29]  R. Passingham,et al.  That's My Hand! Activity in Premotor Cortex Reflects Feeling of Ownership of a Limb , 2004, Science.

[30]  E. Leeuwenberg A perceptual coding language for visual and auditory patterns. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[31]  J. Barham A Poincarean approach to evolutionary epistemology , 1990 .

[32]  H. Pollio,et al.  The anomaly of anomaly , 1977, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.

[33]  I. Richards The Philosophy of Rhetoric , 1936 .

[34]  A. Luchins Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. , 1942 .

[35]  Donald A. Schön Displacement of Concepts , 1963 .

[36]  Brian Greene,et al.  The Fabric of the Cosmos , 2004 .

[37]  J. Piaget Play, dreams and imitation in childhood , 1951 .

[38]  D. G. MacKay,et al.  Metaphor and Thought , 1980 .

[39]  C. Chabris,et al.  Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.

[40]  Semantic Fields and Metaphor: Going beyond Theory , 1996 .

[41]  Mark H. Bickhard,et al.  Levels of representationality , 1998, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[42]  J Kevin O'Regan,et al.  Color naming, unique hues, and hue cancellation predicted from singularities in reflection properties. , 2006, Visual neuroscience.

[43]  B. Indurkhya,et al.  Don't think but look: a gestalt interactionist approach to legal thinking , 1998 .

[44]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Interpreting and evaluating metaphors , 1991 .

[45]  Jelliffe,et al.  Matter and Memory , 1896 .

[46]  R. Kreuz Understanding metaphor in literature: An empirical approach , 1998 .

[47]  Sergei Gepshtein,et al.  Gestalt: From Phenomena to Laws , 2000 .

[48]  R. L. Campbell,et al.  Topologies of learning and development , 1996 .

[49]  Bipin Indurkhya On modeling creativity in legal reasoning , 1997, ICAIL '97.

[50]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Cognition And Reality , 1976 .

[51]  R. Feynman QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter , 1985 .

[52]  D. Hofstadter Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought, Douglas Hofstadter. 1994. Basic Books, New York, NY. 512 pages. ISBN: 0-465-05154-5. $30.00 , 1995 .

[53]  M. Black More about metaphor , 1977 .

[54]  R. M. Warren,et al.  Auditory illusions and confusions. , 1970, Scientific American.

[55]  Mark H. Bickhard,et al.  Interaction and Representation , 1999 .

[56]  C. A. Murthy,et al.  Analysis of IRS imagery for detecting man-made objects with a multivalued recognition system , 1996, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[57]  H. Maturana The tree of knowledge , 1987 .

[58]  M. Arbib,et al.  Vision, brain, and cooperative computation , 1990 .

[59]  Mehdi Dastani,et al.  Languages of perception , 1998 .

[60]  Edward Hirsch Levi,et al.  An Introduction to Legal Reasoning , 1950 .

[61]  S. Pinker,et al.  Visual cognition : An introduction * , 1989 .

[62]  J. Kevin O'Regan,et al.  Is There Something Out There? Inferring Space from Sensorimotor Dependencies , 2003, Neural Computation.

[63]  H. Penny Nii,et al.  Blackboard Systems, Part One: The Blackboard Model of Problem Solving and the Evolution of Blackboard Architectures , 1986, AI Mag..

[64]  Donald A. Schön Metaphor and Thought: Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy , 1993 .

[65]  Arthur G. Samuel,et al.  Phonemic Restoration: Insights From a New Methodology , 1981 .

[66]  Bipin Indurkhya,et al.  The Thesis That All Knowledge Is Metaphorical and Meanings of Metaphor , 1994 .

[67]  Gianni Rodari,et al.  The grammar of fantasy , 1996 .

[68]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.