WHOM TO HANG OUT WITH AND WHERE? ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF SPATIAL SETTING ON THE CHOICE OF ACTIVITY COMPANY

Over the past decade there has been an increasing interest into to role of social interactions and social networks for activities and travel. This coincides with a growing awareness that social and recreational trips make up a considerable share of total mobility and deserve more attention in order to understand trends in mobility. Given this trend remarkably little attention has been given to the investigation of the choice of company for social and recreational activities and travel. This paper contributes to filling this gap, by presenting estimation results of models of company choice for social activities, shopping, sport and recreation and cultural activities, based on activity diary data collected in 2007 in the Netherlands. Specific attention is given to the influence of urban form and accessibility of services on company choice. The estimation results suggest that accessibility of facilities has an impact on company choice. However, the mechanisms seem to differ between activity types. For social activities, shopping and sports/recreation, it seems that better access to facilities leads to more joint activity participation, presumably because coordination between involved parties in time and space becomes easier. In other cases (social and cultural activities), close access to facilities seems to lead to a higher probability of single activity engagement, possibly since impulsive activities (usually single) are easier to implement and pooling of facilities is not necessary.

[1]  M. Bradley,et al.  A model for joint choice of daily activity pattern types of household members , 2005 .

[2]  Dick Ettema,et al.  Theories and models of activity patterns , 1997 .

[3]  Yingling Fan,et al.  Does urban form matter in solo and joint activity engagement , 2009 .

[4]  Frank S. Koppelman,et al.  Modeling household activity–travel interactions as parallel constrained choices , 2005 .

[5]  S. Srinivasan,et al.  An exploratory analysis of joint-activity participation characteristics using the American time use survey , 2008 .

[6]  Sivaramakrishnan Srinivasan,et al.  A multiple discrete-continuous model for independent- and joint-discretionary-activity participation decisions , 2006 .

[7]  Timo Ohnmacht,et al.  Leisure mobility styles in Swiss conurbations: construction and empirical analysis , 2009 .

[8]  R. Cervero,et al.  COMMUTING IN TRANSIT VERSUS AUTOMOBILE NEIGHBORHOODS , 1995 .

[9]  John Urry,et al.  Social networks, travel and talk. , 2003, The British journal of sociology.

[10]  D. Ettema,et al.  If You Pick up the Children, I'll Do the Groceries: Spatial Differences in between-Partner Interactions in out-of-Home Household Activities , 2007 .

[11]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: a social network approach , 2006 .

[12]  Junyi Zhang,et al.  Representing household time allocation behavior by endogenously incorporating diverse intra-household interactions: A case study in the context of elderly couples , 2006 .

[13]  Torsten Hägerstraand WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE IN REGIONAL SCIENCE , 1970 .

[14]  K. Axhausen Social Networks, Mobility Biographies, and Travel: Survey Challenges , 2008 .

[15]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  The influence of land use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies , 2001 .