Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Improves Detection of Invasive Cancer, Preinvasive Cancer, and Premalignant Lesions during Surveillance of Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast in the surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer. Experimental Design: In this prospective comparison study, women at high risk for breast cancer were offered annual surveillance examinations, consisting of mammography, ultrasound, and MRI, at a single tertiary care breast center. The sensitivity and specificity of each modality was based on the histopathologic evaluation of suspicious findings from all modalities plus the detected interval cancers. Results: Three hundred and twenty-seven women underwent 672 complete imaging rounds. Of a total of 28 detected cancers, 14 were detected by mammography, 12 by ultrasound, and 24 by MRI, which resulted in sensitivities of 50%, 42.9%, and 85.7%, respectively (P < 0.01). MRI detected not only significantly more invasive but also significantly more preinvasive cancers (ductal carcinoma in situ). Mammography, ultrasound, and MRI led to 25, 26, and 101 false-positive findings, which resulted in specificities of 98%, 98%, and 92%, respectively (P < 0.05). Thirty-five (35%) of these false-positive findings were atypical ductal hyperplasias, lesions considered to be of premalignant character. Nine (26%) of those were detected by mammography, 2 (6%) with ultrasound, and 32 (91%) with MRI (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Our results show that MRI of the breast improves the detection of invasive cancers, preinvasive cancers, and premalignant lesions in a high-risk population and should therefore become an integral part of breast cancer surveillance in these patients.

[1]  S. Heywang-Köbrunner,et al.  Multicenter Comparative Multimodality Surveillance of Women at Genetic-Familial High Risk for Breast Cancer (HIBCRIT Study): Interim Results , 2008 .

[2]  Laura Cortesi,et al.  Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. , 2007, Radiology.

[3]  M. Yaffe,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography , 2007, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[4]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition , 2006, Cancer.

[5]  P. Tonin,et al.  Mutations in BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 in Breast Cancer Families : Are There More Breast Cancer-Susceptibility Genes ? , 2006 .

[6]  T. Helbich,et al.  Lesion miss rates and false-negative rates for 1115 consecutive cases of stereotactically guided needle-localized open breast biopsy with long-term follow-up. , 2005, Radiology.

[7]  R. Fimmers,et al.  Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  B. Deyarmin,et al.  Timing of Critical Genetic Changes in Human Breast Disease , 2005, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[9]  A R Padhani,et al.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) , 2005, The Lancet.

[10]  Constantine Gatsonis,et al.  Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Cancer.

[11]  S. Lakhani,et al.  Molecular evolution of breast cancer , 2005, The Journal of pathology.

[12]  C. Kuhl,et al.  [The "EVA" Trial: Evaluation of the Efficacy of Diagnostic Methods (Mammography, Ultrasound, MRI) in the secondary and tertiary prevention of familial breast cancer. Preliminary results after the first half of the study period]. , 2005, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[13]  Ellen Warner,et al.  Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination , 2004, JAMA.

[14]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Matthijs Oudkerk,et al.  First experiences in screening women at high risk for breast cancer with MR imaging , 2000, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[16]  R. Salunga,et al.  Gene expression profiles of human breast cancer progression , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  T. Helbich,et al.  Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a validation study. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  P. Chappuis,et al.  Re: Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  E. Morris Illustrated breast MR lexicon. , 2001, Seminars in roentgenology.

[21]  M D Schnall,et al.  MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. , 2001, Radiology.

[22]  J O Barentsz,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  D Krebs,et al.  Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. , 2000, Radiology.

[24]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[25]  J Chang-Claude,et al.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[26]  G Lutterbey,et al.  Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. , 1997, Radiology.

[27]  M D Schnall,et al.  Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. , 1997, Radiology.

[28]  P. Tonin,et al.  Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast cancer families: are there more breast cancer-susceptibility genes? , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[29]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation. , 1996, JAMA.

[30]  N Risch,et al.  Autosomal dominant inheritance of early‐onset breast cancer. Implications for risk prediction , 1994, Cancer.

[31]  D. Page,et al.  Combined histologic and cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of mammary atypical ductal hyperplasia. , 1992, Human pathology.

[32]  W. Kaiser,et al.  MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. , 1989, Radiology.

[33]  A. Morrison,et al.  Basic issues in population screening for cancer. , 1980, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.