Beyond industry–university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base

This paper explores the use of specialist knowledge providers as sources of information in the innovation activities of manufacturing and service firms. Specialist knowledge providers are consultancies, private research organisations and the public science-base (i.e., universities and the government research laboratories). These may be engaged by firms in co-operative arrangement for innovation or as informal sources of information. We find, as anticipated, that amongst other factors specialist knowledge providers are more likely to be engaged by firms with more open approaches to innovation, those with high levels of absorptive capacity, those with greater social capital and networking capabilities, as well as by those with deeper commitments to innovation. Overall, the use of specialist knowledge providers tends to complement firms' own internal innovation activities and to complement other external sources of knowledge. Moreover, the individual types of specialist knowledge providers tend to complement rather than substitute for one another. Beyond this we find significant differences in the types of specialist knowledge providers used by manufacturing and service firms. Although service firms are more likely than manufacturers to use specialist knowledge providers, they are more likely to engage consultants, whilst their links with research-based organisations, including the public science-base, are weaker. We ask whether there is a case for increasing the extent to which the public science-base undertakes activities that are relevant to innovation in the services.

[1]  J. Howells Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation , 2006 .

[2]  Dirk Czarnitzki,et al.  Business services in Germany: bridges for innovation , 2003 .

[3]  F. Gallouj Innovation in the Service Economy: The New Wealth of Nations , 2002 .

[4]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[5]  B. Tether,et al.  Services and the innovation infrastructure , 2007 .

[6]  K. Clark,et al.  Creating project plans to focus product development. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[7]  A. Portes Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[8]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[9]  T. P. Hughes Networks of power : electrification in Western society, 1880-1930 , 1984 .

[10]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Geography of Innovation , 2006 .

[11]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[12]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer , 2005 .

[13]  Mark Harvey,et al.  Analysing distributed processes of provision and innovation , 2003 .

[14]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Networks of Innovators , 2006 .

[15]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[16]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[17]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[18]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Sectoral Systems: How and Why Innovation Differs across Sectors , 2006 .

[19]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[20]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Universities in National Innovation Systems , 2006 .

[21]  Andrew B. Hargadon Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in Pursuing Continuous Innovation , 1998 .

[22]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[23]  B. Lundvall National Systems of Innovation , 1992 .

[24]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[25]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Insights into services and innovation in the knowledge intensive economy , 2003 .

[26]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[27]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[28]  Fabrice Galia,et al.  Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France , 2004 .

[29]  N. Sakkab Connect & Develop Complements Research & Develop at P&G , 2002 .

[30]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[32]  Faïz Gallouj,et al.  New modes of innovation: How services benefit industry , 1995 .

[33]  M. Dodgson,et al.  The Role of Technology in the Shift Towards Open Innovation: The Case of Procter & Gamble , 2006 .

[34]  Rob Cross,et al.  A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Stephen P. Jenkins,et al.  Multivariate Probit Regression using Simulated Maximum Likelihood , 2003 .

[36]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[37]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[38]  R. Lambert,et al.  Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration: Final Report , 2003 .

[39]  H. Rush,et al.  Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer , 1995 .

[40]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[41]  Bruce Tether,et al.  Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Services and systems of innovation , 2004 .

[42]  Bo Carlsson Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[43]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[44]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Systems of innovation perspectives and challenges , 2004 .

[45]  J. Howells Research and Technology Outsourcing , 1999 .

[46]  Amy L. Ostrom,et al.  Client Co-Production in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services , 2002 .

[47]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[48]  A. Salter,et al.  Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? , 2004 .

[49]  Ralph Katz The human side of managing technological innovation : a collection of readings , 2004 .

[50]  M. Tushman,et al.  Boundary Spanning Individuals: Their Role in Information Transfer and Their Antecedents , 1981 .

[51]  B. Tether Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis , 2002 .

[52]  A. Arora,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY AND EXTERNAL LINKAGES: THE STRATEGIES OF THE LARGE FIRMS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY* , 1990 .

[53]  A. Zenker,et al.  Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems , 2001 .

[54]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[55]  Stephen P. Jenkins,et al.  Calculation of Multivariate Normal Probabilities by Simulation, with Applications to Maximum Simulated Likelihood Estimation , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[56]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  FIRM SIZE AND TECHNOLOGY CENTRALITY IN INDUSTRY-UNIVERSITY INTERACTIONS , 2002 .

[57]  B. Tether Do Services Innovate (Differently)? Insights from the European Innobarometer Survey , 2005 .

[58]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[59]  C. Edquist Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[60]  Ian Miles,et al.  Innovation systems in the service economy : measurement and case study analysis , 2000 .

[61]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[62]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities , 2007 .

[63]  Jon Sundbo,et al.  Innovation as a loosely coupled system in services , 2000, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag..

[64]  F. Malerba Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe , 2009 .

[65]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  Economics of Product Development by Users: the Impact of Sticky Local Information , 1998 .

[66]  D. Teece Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets , 1998 .

[67]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Technological Accumulation, Diversification and Organisation in UK Companies, 1945-1983 , 1989 .

[68]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  The Size Distribution of Innovating Firms in the UK: 1945-1983 , 1987 .

[69]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[70]  Tom Kelley Designing for Business, Consulting for Innovation , 2010 .

[71]  N. Sakkab,et al.  Connect and Develop : Inside Procter & Gamble's New Model for Innovation , 2006 .

[72]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[73]  P. Hertog KNOWLEDGE-INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICES AS CO-PRODUCERS OF INNOVATION , 2000 .

[74]  Paul A. David,et al.  The Political Economy of Public Science , 1999 .