Collision avoidance maneuvers for multiple threatening objects using heuristic algorithms

This paper compares and analyzes four heuristic algorithms for collision avoidance maneuver optimization (CAMO) when multiple space objects threaten a satellite. Classical gradient-based optimization methods are not appropriate for this kind of problem due to their discontinuities. On the other hand, heuristic algorithms can obtain suboptimal solutions due to their robustness and flexibility. In this paper, we develop CAMO planning methods using four heuristic algorithms. Their performance is compared in terms of the Del-V achieved under constraints on the minimum distance between the user satellite and multiple threatening objects, the maximum burn duration, and the boundary conditions for the maneuver start time. To validate the proposed strategy with the heuristic algorithms, two CAMO problems are analyzed. One is a simple problem using two control parameters (the maneuver start time and Del-V along the in-track direction) when a single threatening object is approaching. The second is a more complex CAMO problem that uses four control parameters (the maneuver start time and Del-V in three directions, i.e. radial, in-track, and cross-track) when four threatening objects are approaching from different angles and at different times. As a result, we minimize Del-V for each CAMO problem while satisfying all constraints. The differential evolution heuristic algorithm is found to exhibit the best performance in terms of minimized Del-V.

[1]  J. Piñeiro,et al.  Optimal collision avoidance maneuvers using Pseudospectral Methods European Space Surveillance Conference 7-9 June 2011 , INTA , 2011 .

[2]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[3]  Hae-Dong Kim,et al.  A Study on the Collision Avoidance Maneuver Optimization with Multiple Space Debris , 2012 .

[4]  S. Kais,et al.  Phase transitions for N-electron atoms at the large-dimension limit , 1997 .

[5]  John Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Sys-tems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology , 1975 .

[6]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[7]  M. Clerc,et al.  The swarm and the queen: towards a deterministic and adaptive particle swarm optimization , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406).

[8]  Sabre Kais,et al.  Pivot method for global optimization , 1997 .

[9]  Salvatore Cssi Alfano,et al.  Collision Avoidance Maneuver Planning Tool , 2005 .

[10]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[11]  H. Klinkrad Space Debris: Models and Risk Analysis , 2006 .

[12]  W. Vries Maneuver Optimization through Simulated Annealing , 2011 .

[13]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.