How to use (five) curriculum design principles to align authentic learning environments, assessment, students’ approaches to thinking and learning outcomes

In this article, we articulate five principles of curriculum design and illustrate their application in a third‐year undergraduate course for environmental and ecological scientists. In this way, we provide a practical framework for others wishing to enhance their students’ learning. To apply the five principles, we created a learning environment consisting of a broad range of learning resources and activities which were structured and sequenced with an integrated assessment strategy. The combined effect of this ensured alignment between the learning environment we created, the thinking approaches students used and the learning outcomes they achieved. More specifically, the assessment activities guided students by requiring them to recognise when their understanding was limited – and then to engage them in thinking approaches that would develop their understanding further. By providing a framework of thoughts, ideas and information, we sought to progressively enhance the sophistication of our learners’ thinking. Thus, the assessment required students to integrate, synthesise and construct their understandings in ways consistent with the discipline and the professional pathways on which they had embarked. We intend that this illustration will act as a guide to other academics to adopt the same principles in their teaching.

[1]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments , 1990 .

[2]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[3]  D. Rowntree Assessing Students: How Shall We Know Them? , 1977 .

[4]  G. Bodner Constructivism: A theory of knowledge , 1986 .

[5]  William H. Leonard How Do College Students Best Learn Science , 2000 .

[6]  L. Unwin,et al.  Approaches to learning , 2002 .

[7]  J. Mintzes,et al.  Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: A longitudinal study of conceptual change in biology , 1997 .

[8]  W. Bean Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy , 1961 .

[9]  E. Glasersfeld Learning as Constructive Activity , 1983 .

[10]  Paul Ramsden,et al.  Theories of Learning and Teaching and the Practice of Excellence in Higher Education , 1993 .

[11]  F. Marton,et al.  Approaches to learning , 2003 .

[12]  D. Halpern Teaching for Critical Thinking: Helping College Students Develop the Skills and Dispositions of a Critical Thinker , 1999 .

[13]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING—II OUTCOME AS A FUNCTION OF THE LEARNER'S CONCEPTION OF THE TASK , 1976 .

[14]  A J DINI Foundations of learning. , 1953, The X-ray technician.

[15]  Julie Fisher The Foundations of Learning , 2002 .

[16]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Experimenting in a constructivist high school physics laboratory , 1994 .

[17]  F. Marton,et al.  Learning and Awareness , 1997 .

[18]  L. Svensson On Qualitative Differences in Learning: III--Study Skill and Learning. , 1977 .

[19]  Kevin F. Collis,et al.  Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy , 1977 .

[20]  G. Boulton‐Lewis Teaching for quality learning at university , 2008 .

[21]  D. Bligh Learning to teach in higher education , 1993 .

[22]  William McClune,et al.  How Students Learn , 2010 .

[23]  C. P. Goodman,et al.  The Tacit Dimension , 2003 .

[24]  Stephen Brookfield,et al.  Developing critical thinkers: Challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting. , 1989 .

[25]  E. Eisner The Educational Imagination: On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs Elliot W. Eisner New York: Macmillan, 1979. 293 pp, $15.95 , 1980 .

[26]  L. Svensson,et al.  SYMPOSIUM: LEARNING PROCESSES AND STRATEGIES—III , 1977 .

[27]  Robert G. Fuller,et al.  Students' reactions to undergraduate science , 1977 .

[28]  Christine Chin,et al.  Learning deeply in science: An analysis and reintegration of deep approaches in two case studies of grade 8 students , 2000 .

[29]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Reliability and replicability of the Approaches to Studying Questionnaire , 1990 .

[30]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[31]  D. Halpern Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. , 1998, The American psychologist.

[32]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  Learning to teach. , 1996 .

[33]  J. M. Collins Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher , 1997 .