Clinical evaluation of an enamel matrix protein derivative combined with a bioactive glass for the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in humans.

BACKGROUND The purpose of the present study was to compare the treatment of deep intrabony defects with a combination of an enamel matrix protein derivative (EMD) and a bioactive glass (BG) to BG alone. METHODS Twenty-eight patients with chronic periodontitis, each of whom displayed 1 intrabony defect, were randomly treated with a combination of EMD and BG or with BG alone. Soft tissue measurements were made at baseline and at 1 year following therapy. RESULTS No differences in any of the investigated parameters were observed at baseline between the 2 groups. Healing was uneventful in all patients. At 1 year after therapy, the sites treated with EMD and BG showed a reduction in mean probing depth (PD) from 8.07 +/- 1.14 mm to 3.92 +/- 0.73 mm and a change in mean clinical attachment level (CAL) from 9.64 +/- 1.59 mm to 6.42 +/- 1.08 mm (P < 0.0001). In the group treated with BG, the mean PD was reduced from 8.07 +/- 1.32 mm to 3.85 +/- 0.66 mm and the mean CAL changed from 9.78 +/- 1.71 mm to 6.71 +/- 1.89 mm (P < 0.0001). No statistically significant differences in any of the investigated parameters were observed between the test and control group. CONCLUSIONS Within the limits of the present study, it can be concluded that both therapies led to significant improvements of the investigated clinical parameters, and the combination of enamel matrix derivative and bioactive glass does not seem to additionally improve the clinical outcome of the therapy.

[1]  G. Pini-Prato,et al.  Effect of cigarette smoking on periodontal healing following GTR in infrabony defects. A preliminary retrospective study. , 2005, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[2]  E. Reich,et al.  Treatment of intrabony defects with enamel matrix proteins and guided tissue regeneration. A prospective controlled clinical study. , 2001, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[3]  S. Lyngstadaas,et al.  Autocrine growth factors in human periodontal ligament cells cultured on enamel matrix derivative. , 2001, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[4]  L. Wolff,et al.  Enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of human intrabony osseous defects. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[5]  J. Fiorellini,et al.  Human histologic evaluation of bioactive ceramic in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. , 2000, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[6]  T. Karring Regenerative periodontal therapy. , 2000, Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology.

[7]  L. Hammarström,et al.  Expression of amelin and amelogenin in epithelial root sheath remnants of fully formed rat molars. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[8]  D. Carnes,et al.  Porcine fetal enamel matrix derivative stimulates proliferation but not differentiation of pre-osteoblastic 2T9 cells, inhibits proliferation and stimulates differentiation of osteoblast-like MG63 cells, and increases proliferation and differentiation of normal human osteoblast NHOst cells. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[9]  G. Rasperini,et al.  Comparison of treatments of infrabony defects with enamel matrix derivative, guided tissue regeneration with a nonresorbable membrane and Widman modified flap. A pilot study. , 2000, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[10]  A. Sculean,et al.  Clinical and histologic evaluation of human intrabony defects treated with an enamel matrix protein derivative (Emdogain). , 2000, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[11]  D. M. Burns,et al.  Cytostatic action of enamel matrix derivative (EMDOGAIN) on human oral squamous cell carcinoma-derived SCC25 epithelial cells. , 2000, Journal of periodontal research.

[12]  T. Karring,et al.  Treatment of intrabony defects with guided tissue regeneration and enamel-matrix-proteins. An experimental study in monkeys. , 2000, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[13]  J. Wennström,et al.  Periodontal tissue alterations following Emdogain treatment of periodontal sites with angular bone defects. A series of case reports. , 1999, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[14]  J. Wennström,et al.  The use of barrier membranes and enamel matrix proteins in the treatment of angular bone defects. A prospective controlled clinical study. , 1999, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[15]  S. Amar,et al.  Histologic observations of periodontal wound healing after treatment with PerioGlas in nonhuman primates. , 1999, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[16]  T. Karring,et al.  Healing of human intrabony defects following treatment with enamel matrix proteins or guided tissue regeneration. , 1999, Journal of periodontal research.

[17]  E. Reich,et al.  Treatment of intrabony periodontal defects with an enamel matrix protein derivative (Emdogain): a report of 32 cases. , 1999, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[18]  E. Reich,et al.  Comparison of enamel matrix proteins and bioabsorbable membranes in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects. A split-mouth study. , 1999, Journal of periodontology.

[19]  K. Selvig,et al.  Periodontal wound healing and regeneration. , 1999, Periodontology 2000.

[20]  D. Cochran,et al.  Clinical evaluation of bioactive glass in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[21]  S. Froum,et al.  Comparison of bioactive glass synthetic bone graft particles and open debridement in the treatment of human periodontal defects. A clinical study. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[22]  R. Elswick,et al.  Equivalence and superiority testing in regeneration clinical trials. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[23]  L. Heijl Periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative in one human experimental defect. A case report. , 1997, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[24]  G. Heden,et al.  Enamel matrix derivative (EMDOGAIN) in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects. , 1997, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[25]  O. Zetterström,et al.  Clinical safety of enamel matrix derivative (EMDOGAIN) in the treatment of periodontal defects. , 1997, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[26]  L. Hammarström,et al.  Periodontal regeneration in a buccal dehiscence model in monkeys after application of enamel matrix proteins. , 1997, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[27]  L. Hammarström Enamel matrix, cementum development and regeneration. , 1997, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[28]  S. Low,et al.  An evaluation of bioactive ceramic in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. , 1997, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[29]  U Brägger,et al.  Particulate bioglass as a grafting material in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. , 1997, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[30]  I. Slabý,et al.  Amelin: An enamel‐related protein, transcribed in the cells of epithelial root sheath , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[31]  N. Lang,et al.  Compartmentalization of inflammatory cell phenotypes in normal gingiva and peri-implant keratinized mucosa. , 1995, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[32]  Fetner Ae,et al.  Periodontal repair using PerioGlas in nonhuman primates: clinical and histologic observations. , 1994 .

[33]  R. Yukna Synthetic bone grafts in periodontics. , 1993, Periodontology 2000.

[34]  S. Garrett,et al.  Periodontal regeneration: a review of flap management. , 1993, Periodontology 2000.

[35]  J. Mellonig,et al.  Bone grafts and periodontal regeneration. , 1993, Periodontology 2000.

[36]  J. Mellonig,et al.  Comparison of decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft and porous particulate hydroxyapatite in human periodontal osseous defects. , 1989, Journal of periodontology.

[37]  S. Froum,et al.  Histologic and clinical responses to porous hydroxylapatite implants in human periodontal defects. Three to twelve months postimplantation. , 1987, Journal of periodontology.

[38]  J. Thomas,et al.  Hydroxylapatite as an alloplastic graft in the treatment of human periodontal osseous defects. , 1985, Journal of periodontology.

[39]  H. C. Sullivan,et al.  A Clinical and Histological Evaluation of Autogenous Iliac Bone Grafts in Humans: Part I. Wound Healing 2 to 8 Months , 1973 .

[40]  H Löe,et al.  The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems. , 1967, Journal of periodontology.

[41]  S. Froum,et al.  A comparative study utilizing open flap debridement with and without enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a 12-month re-entry study. , 2001, Journal of periodontology.

[42]  T. Karring,et al.  Healing of recession-type defects following treatment with enamel matrix proteins or guided tissue regeneration. A pilot study in monkeys , 2000 .

[43]  V. Everts,et al.  Enamel matrix-derived protein stimulates attachment of periodontal ligament fibroblasts and enhances alkaline phosphatase activity and transforming growth factor beta1 release of periodontal ligament and gingival fibroblasts. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[44]  R. Corio,et al.  Histologic evaluation of new attachment apparatus formation in humans. Part II. , 1989, Journal of periodontology.