Existence of gradient in cell adhesiveness along the developing Xenopus hind limb bud, shown by a cellular sorting‐out experiment in vitro

To examine the possibility of a difference in cell adhesiveness along the developing Xenopus hind limb bud axes, single mesenchymal cells from developing hind limb buds were cultured, allowing them to form an aggregate in a gyratory culture system. By observing the distribution of cells within aggregates, it was found that sorting‐out occurred between cells from different positions and different stages. Cells derived from more distal positions tended to be situated interiorly in the aggregates. According to Steinberg's differential adhesion hypothesis, these results support the idea that there is a graded difference in cell adhesiveness along the proximo‐distal axis of the developing limb, with adhesiveness increasing distally. Although similar sorting‐out was observed between anterior and posterior cell populations, it could not be determined which cell populations were definitely more cohesive. These properties may be correlated with the experimentally demonstrated ‘positional value', which should be different among cells located at different positions along the axes of the developing vertebrate limb bud.

[1]  S A Newman,et al.  Sticky fingers: Hox genes and cell adhesion in vertebrate limb development. , 1996, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[2]  H. Iba,et al.  Misexpression of Hoxa-13 induces cartilage homeotic transformation and changes cell adhesiveness in chick limb buds. , 1995, Genes & development.

[3]  Paul Martin,et al.  A role for FGF-8 in the initiation and maintenance of vertebrate limb bud outgrowth , 1995, Current Biology.

[4]  H. Ide,et al.  Sorting out of limb bud cells in monolayer culture. , 1994, The International journal of developmental biology.

[5]  B. Olwin,et al.  FGF-2: apical ectodermal ridge growth signal for chick limb development. , 1994, Science.

[6]  H. Ide,et al.  Sorting out of cells from different parts and stages of the chick limb bud. , 1994, Developmental biology.

[7]  M. Takeichi,et al.  Experimental specification of cell sorting, tissue spreading, and specific spatial patterning by quantitative differences in cadherin expression. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  R. Tuan,et al.  Expression and functional involvement of N-cadherin in embryonic limb chondrogenesis. , 1994, Development.

[9]  C. Tickle,et al.  FGF-4 replaces the apical ectodermal ridge and directs outgrowth and patterning of the limb , 1993, Cell.

[10]  C. Chuong,et al.  Adhesion molecules in skeletogenesis: II. Neural cell adhesion molecules mediate precartilaginous mesenchymal condensations and enhance chondrogenesis , 1993, Journal of cellular physiology.

[11]  Glazier,et al.  Simulation of the differential adhesion driven rearrangement of biological cells. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[12]  Neil Shubin,et al.  EVOLUTION AND MORPHOGENETIC RULES: THE SHAPE OF THE VERTEBRATE LIMB IN ONTOGENY AND PHYLOGENY , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[13]  D. Stocum,et al.  Retinoic acid coordinately proximalizes regenerate pattern and blastema differential affinity in axolotl limbs. , 1988, Development.

[14]  L Wolpert,et al.  Cell sorting and chondrogenic aggregate formation in micromass culture. , 1987, Developmental biology.

[15]  M. Bronner‐Fraser Alterations in neural crest migration by a monoclonal antibody that affects cell adhesion , 1985, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  D. Stocum The urodele limb regeneration blastema. Determination and organization of the morphogenetic field. , 1984, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[17]  K. Heintzelman,et al.  Liquid-tissue behavior and differential cohesiveness during chick limb budding. , 1978, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[18]  D. Summerbell Interaction between the proximo-distal and antero-posterior co-ordinates of positional value during the specification of positional information in the early development of the chick limb-bud. , 1974, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[19]  D. SUMMERBELL,et al.  Positional Information in Chick Limb Morphogenesis , 1973, Nature.

[20]  J. W. Saunders,et al.  Ectodermal-mesodermal interactions in the growth of limb buds in the chick embryo: constancy and temporal limits of the ectodermal induction. , 1972, Developmental biology.

[21]  S. Spicer,et al.  SPECIFIC STAINING OF SULPHATE GROUPS WITH ALCIAN BLUE AT LOW pH , 1964, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[22]  Malcolm S. Steinberg,et al.  Reconstruction of Tissues by Dissociated Cells , 1963 .

[23]  P A TSCHUMI,et al.  The growth of the hindlimb bud of Xenopus laevis and its dependence upon the epidermis. , 1957, Journal of anatomy.