Regional Corporate Spawning and the Role of Homegrown Companies

This paper presents the results and policy implications of a study that examined the spawning of founders who had previously been employed at large corporations. We found that spawning of founders is positively associated with the parent companies' productivity, innovativeness, and headquarter location. Furthermore, we found that the spin-off per employee rate is higher in smaller establishments. We also found that the local entrepreneurial culture is significant in explaining local spawning of founders. Finally, we present new empirical evidence on the crucial role of successful homegrown companies in regional cluster development. More specifically, we found that the existence of successful homegrown companies is significantly correlated with the level of the regional entrepreneurial activity. This finding is consistent with the finding of many cluster development case studies. Thus, we argue that successful homegrown companies have a unique role in cluster development. This role can seldom be replaced by nonhomegrown companies. This is related to the notion that prior to the development of an entrepreneurial cluster, some intangible precondition should be realized such as the appearance of local role models and a shift toward a more entrepreneurial culture. In a more general perspective, these results support the notion that knowledge-based regional development is a complex process that requires a long-term and continuously adjusting supporting policy rather than being based mainly on attracting established companies' R&D centers to the region. Copyright 2010 by The Policy Studies Organization.

[1]  A. Saxenian.  The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley , 1991 .

[2]  W. Coffey,et al.  THE CONCEPT OF LOCAL DEVELOPMENT: A STAGES MODEL OF ENDOGENOUS REGIONAL GROWTH* , 1984 .

[3]  A. Segarra,et al.  Business Dynamics and Efficiency in Industries and Regions: The Case of Spain , 1999 .

[4]  A. Cooper.  The role of incubator organizations in the founding of growth-oriented firms , 1985 .

[5]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Homegrown Solutions: Fostering Cluster Formation , 2004 .

[6]  F. Barry,et al.  FDI and Trade: The Irish Host�?Country Experience , 1997 .

[7]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Disagreements, Spinoffs, and the Evolution of Detroit as the Capital of the U.S. Automobile Industry , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Kevin Davis,et al.  Building High-Tech Clusters: Learning the Silicon Valley Way , 2004 .

[9]  E. Ofek,et al.  Diversification's effect on firm value , 1995 .

[10]  Michael S. Dahl,et al.  No 03-11 Entry by Spinoff in a High-tech Cluster by , 2003 .

[11]  S. Young,et al.  Regional location of multinational corporation subsidiaries and economic development contribution: Evidence from the UK , 2009 .

[12]  R. Martin,et al.  Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? , 2003 .

[13]  W. Coffey,et al.  Local development: Conceptual bases and policy implications , 1985 .

[14]  M. Feldman.  The Entrepreneurial Event Revisited: Firm Formation in a Regional Context , 2001 .

[15]  Zoltan Acs,et al.  How Is Entrepreneurship Good for Economic Growth? , 2006, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[16]  Åsa Lindholm Dahlstrand,et al.  Growth and inventiveness in technology-based spin-off firms , 1997 .

[17]  E. Strobl,et al.  Spillovers from Foreign Firms Through Worker Mobility: An Empirical Investigation , 2002, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[18]  AnnaLee Saxenian,et al.  Silicon Valley’s New Immigrant High-Growth Entrepreneurs , 2002 .

[19]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Do Bad Bidders Become Good Targets? , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  O. Sorenson.  Social networks and industrial geography , 2003 .

[21]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Innovating Region: Toward a Theory of Knowledge-Based Regional Development , 2005 .

[22]  Richard Florida,et al.  Creativity and Entrepreneurship: A Regional Analysis of New Firm Formation , 2004 .

[23]  H. V. D. Ven.  The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship , 1993 .

[24]  Gil Avnimelech,et al.  Venture capital start-up co-evolution and the emergence & development of Israel's new high tech cluster , 2004 .

[25]  Patricia Higino H. Schneider,et al.  International trade, economic growth and intellectual property rights: A panel data study of developed and developing countries , 2005 .

[26]  A. Akinlo.  Foreign direct investment and growth in Nigeria: An empirical investigation , 2004 .

[27]  Luigi Orsenigo,et al.  The (Failed) Development of a Biotechnology Cluster: The Case of Lombardy , 2001 .

[28]  Per Davidsson,et al.  Culture, structure and regional levels of entrepreneurship , 1995 .

[29]  J. Markusen,et al.  Foreign Direct Investment as a Catalyst for Industrial Development , 1997 .

[30]  A. Malach-Pines,et al.  Entrepreneurs as cultural heroes , 2005 .

[31]  J. Stein,et al.  Information Production and Capital Allocation: Decentralized vs. Hierarchical Firms , 2000 .

[32]  C. V. Praag,et al.  The Roots of Entrepreneurship and Labour Demand: Individual Ability and Low Risk Aversion , 2001 .

[33]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[34]  M. Dowling,et al.  Firm networks: external relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms , 2003 .

[35]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  The Economics of Small Firms , 1990 .

[36]  Åsa Lindholm Dahlstrand,et al.  Technology-based SMEs in the Go ¨teborg Region: Their Origin and Interaction with Universities and Large Firms , 1999 .

[37]  April Franco,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER THROUGH INHERITANCE: SPIN- OUT GENERATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND SURVIVAL , 2004 .

[38]  Johanna L. Francis,et al.  Creating a Cluster While Building a Firm: Entrepreneurs and the Formation of Industrial Clusters , 2005 .

[39]  S. Klepper.  Employee Startups in High‐Tech Industries , 2001 .

[40]  Max-Peter Menzel,et al.  Cluster life cycles—dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution , 2010 .

[41]  Z. Ács,et al.  The Determinants of Regional Variation in New Firm Formation , 2002 .

[42]  D. Mowery.  Plus ca change: Industrial R&D in the “third industrial revolution” , 2008 .

[43]  Peter Thompson,et al.  Disagreements and Intra-industry Spinoffs , 2010 .

[44]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  FROM CONCEPTION TO BIRTH: OPPORTUNITY PERCEPTION AND RESOURCE MOBILIZATION IN ENTREPRENEURSHIP , 2003 .

[45]  D. Scharfstein,et al.  The Dark Side of Internal Capital Markets: Divisional Rent-Seeking and Inefficient Investment , 1997 .

[46]  A. Arora,et al.  The Indian Software Services Industry , 1999 .

[47]  K. Meyer.  Perspectives on multinational enterprises in emerging economies , 2004 .

[48]  Guido Buenstorf,et al.  B2C—bubble to cluster: the dot-com boom, spin-off entrepreneurship, and regional agglomeration , 2009 .

[49]  S. Zahra,et al.  International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance - The moderating effect of international environmental hostility , 2000 .

[50]  T. Bresnahan,et al.  ‘Old Economy’ Inputs for ‘New Economy’ Outcomes: Cluster Formation in the New Silicon Valleys , 2001 .

[51]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  Growth Regimes over Time and Space , 2002 .

[52]  D. Scharfstein.  The Dark Side of Internal Capital Markets Ii: Evidence from Diversified Conglomerates , 1998 .

[53]  Antoinette Schoar,et al.  Effects of Corporate Diversification on Productivity , 2002 .

[54]  Michael Hobday.  Innovation in East Asia: Diversity and development , 1995 .

[55]  Nathan Miller,et al.  Does Function Follow Organizational Form? Evidence from the Lending Practices of Large and Small Banks , 2002 .

[56]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  Foreign direct investment and spillovers through workers’ mobility , 2001 .

[57]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms , 2003 .

[58]  Z. Ács,et al.  The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[59]  Albert N. Link,et al.  The Growth of Research Triangle Park , 2003 .

[60]  Scott Shane,et al.  Bringing individuals back in: the effects of career experience on new firm founding , 2003 .

[61]  S. Zahra,et al.  Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis , 1995 .

[62]  AnnaLee Saxenian,et al.  Regional Networks and the Resurgence of Silicon Valley , 1990 .

[63]  Sankaran Venkataraman,et al.  Regional transformation through technological entrepreneurship , 2004 .

[64]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Entry by Spinoffs , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[65]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Technology strategy and new venture performance: A study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures , 1996 .

[66]  P. Haug.  US high technology multinationals and Silicon Glen , 1986 .

[67]  G. Avnimelech,et al.  Creating venture capital industries that co-evolve with high tech: Insights from an extended industry life cycle perspective of the Israeli experience , 2006 .

[68]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  Entrepreneurial Spawning: Public Corporations and the Genesis of New Ventures, 1986-1999 , 2003 .

[69]  D. Holtz-eakin,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: the Proof is in the Productivity , 2003 .

[70]  G. Dosi,et al.  An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics , 1994 .

[71]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Cluster genesis : technology-based industrial development , 2008 .

[72]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US automobile industry , 2002 .

[73]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Heritage and Agglomeration: The Akron Tyre Cluster Revisited , 2009 .

[74]  S. Shane.  Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .