Ferenczi’s Ethics for Our Time: The Possibility of Being Alongside

[1]  E. Berman.  ON “POLYGAMOUS ANALYSIS” , 2015, The American journal of psychoanalysis.

[2]  E. Koritar.  Surviving Deadness in the Analytic Experience , 2014, The American Journal of Psychoanalysis.

[3]  L. Cabré.  From introjection to intropression: evolution of a theoretical concept and its consequences for psychoanalytic technique. , 2011 .

[4]  P. Boschan.  In these pages… , 2011, The American journal of psychoanalysis.

[5]  Sylvia Hutchinson.  Foulkesian Authority: Another View. Response to Lecture by Morris Nitsun , 2009 .

[6]  M. Nitsun.  Authority and Revolt: The Challenges of Group Leadership , 2009 .

[7]  G. Winther.  The 33rd S.H. Foulkes Annual Lecture: President’s Introduction , 2008 .

[8]  H. Behr,et al.  Group-Analytic Psychotherapy: A Meeting of Minds , 2005 .

[9]  Marcelo N. Viñar.  The specifi city of torture as trauma: The human wilderness when words fail , 2005, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[10]  H. Behr,et al.  Group-Analytic Psychotherapy , 2005 .

[11]  Jerome S. Gans,et al.  The Anti-Group: Destructive Forces in the Group and Their Creative Potential , 1997 .

[12]  S. Foulkes.  Selected Papers: Psychoanalysis and Group Analysis , 1990 .

[13]  M. Grotjahn.  The Clinical Diary of Sandor Ferenczi , 1990 .

[14]  I. Yalom.  Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego , 1974 .

[15]  H. Ellenberger.  The discovery of the unconscious : the history and evolution of dynamic psychiatry , 1970 .

[16]  S. H. Foulkes,et al.  Therapeutic group analysis , 1964 .