Facilitated detection of angry faces: Initial orienting and processing efficiency

In a visual search task, displays of four schematic faces (angry, sad, happy, or neutral) were presented. Participants decided whether the faces were all the same or whether one was different. A discrepant angry face in a context of three neutral faces was detected faster than other faces. This occurred in the absence of a higher probability of first fixation on the angry face. Moreover, angry faces were more accurately detected even when presented parafoveally. These results are not consistent with the hypothesis that angry faces are detected faster because they are looked at earlier. In contrast, angry faces were looked at less than other faces during the search process and were more accurately detected than other faces when the display duration was reduced to 150 ms. These results support the processing efficiency hypothesis, according to which fewer attentional resources are needed to identify angry faces, which would account for their speeded detection time. In addition, parafoveal analysis of the angry faces may start preattentively, which would account for the fewer and shorter fixations that they need later, when they come under the focus of attention.

[1]  C. H. Hansen,et al.  Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[3]  H. Yamada Visual Information for Categorizing Facial Expression of Emotions , 1993 .

[4]  H. Nothdurft Faces and Facial Expressions do not Pop Out , 1993, Perception.

[5]  A. Öhman,et al.  Automatically elicited fear: Conditioned skin conductance responses to masked facial expressions , 1994 .

[6]  Murray White,et al.  Preattentive analysis of facial expressions of emotion , 1995 .

[7]  D. Purcell,et al.  It Takes a Confounded Face to Pop Out of a Crowd , 1996, Perception.

[8]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  K. Mogg,et al.  Attentional Bias for Threatening Facial Expressions in Anxiety: Manipulation of Stimulus Duration , 1998 .

[10]  Francisco Esteves,et al.  The Face of Wrath: Critical Features for Conveying Facial Threat , 1999 .

[11]  J. Henderson,et al.  The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing , 1999 .

[12]  Karin Mogg,et al.  Covert and overt orienting of attention to emotional faces in anxiety , 2000 .

[13]  E. Fox,et al.  Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently? , 2000, Cognition & emotion.

[14]  K. Mogg,et al.  Biases in eye movements to threatening facial expressions in generalized anxiety disorder and depressive disorder. , 2000, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[15]  A. Ohman,et al.  The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  E. Fox,et al.  Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  R. Dolan,et al.  Effects of Attention and Emotion on Face Processing in the Human Brain An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2001, Neuron.

[18]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  E. Fox,et al.  Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces , 2002, Cognition & emotion.

[20]  Jean-Christophe Rohner,et al.  The time-course of visual threat processing: High trait anxious individuals eventually avert their gaze from angry faces , 2002 .

[21]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Priming Visual Face-Processing Mechanisms: Electrophysiological Evidence , 2002, Psychological science.

[22]  Andrew W Young,et al.  The eyebrow frown: a salient social signal. , 2002, Emotion.

[23]  Colin MacLeod,et al.  Contrasting two accounts of anxiety-linked attentional bias: selective attention to varying levels of stimulus threat intensity. , 2003, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[24]  A. Jedynak,et al.  Rapid extraction of emotional expression: evidence from evoked potential fields during brief presentation of face stimuli , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  M. Fenske,et al.  Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: evidence from flanker tasks. , 2003, Emotion.

[26]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Negative facial expression captures attention and disrupts performance , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  P. Lang,et al.  Parafoveal semantic processing of emotional visual scenes. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  P. Subramanian Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing , 2006 .

[29]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Eye movement assessment of selective attentional capture by emotional pictures. , 2006, Emotion.

[30]  Kang Chen,et al.  Visual Attention and Eye Movements , 2008 .