Effect of nitrogen fertilization on nitrate leaching in relation to grain yield response on loamy sand in Sweden

Abstract High rates of nitrogen (N) fertilizer may increase N leaching with drainage, especially when there is no further crop response. It is often discussed whether leaching is affected only at levels that no longer give an economic return, or whether reducing fertilization below the economic optimum could reduce leaching further. To study nitrate leaching with different fertilizer N rates (0–135 kg N ha −1 ) and grain yield responses, field experiments in spring oats were conducted in 2007, 2008 and 2009 on loamy sand in south-west Sweden. Nitrate leaching was determined from nitrate concentrations in soil water sampled with ceramic suction cups and measured discharge at a nearby measuring station. The results showed that nitrate leaching per kg grain produced had its minimum around the economic optimum, here defined as the fertilization level where each extra kg of fertilizer N resulted in a 10 kg increase in grain yield (85% DM). There were no statistically significant differences in leaching between treatments fertilized below this level. However, N leaching was significantly elevated in some of the treatments with higher fertilization rates and the increase in nitrate leaching from increased N fertilization could be described with an exponential function. According to this function, the increase was −1 fertilizer N at and below the economic optimum. Above this fertilization level, the nitrate leaching response gradually increased as the yield response ceased and the increase amounted to 0.1 and 0.5 kg kg −1 when the economic optimum was exceeded by 35 and 100 kg N ha −1 , respectively. The economic optimum fertilization level depends on the price relationship between grain and fertilizer, which in Sweden can vary between 5:1 and 15:1. In other words, precision fertilization that provides no more or no less than a 10 kg increase in grain yield per kg extra N fertilizer can be optimal for both crop profitability and the environment. To predict this level already at fertilization is a great challenge, and it could be argued that rates should be kept down further to ensure that they are not exceeded due to overestimation of the optimum rate. However, the development of precision agriculture with new tools for prediction may reduce this risk.

[1]  H. Aronsson,et al.  Reducing nitrate leaching after winter oilseed rape and peas in mild and cold winters , 2011, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[2]  Sofia Delin,et al.  Yield and protein response to fertilizer nitrogen in different parts of a cereal field: potential of site-specific fertilization , 2005 .

[3]  Sofia Delin,et al.  Relations Between Net Nitrogen Mineralization and Soil Characteristics Within an Arable Field , 2002 .

[4]  S. E. Simmelsgaard,et al.  An empirical model for estimating nitrate leaching as affected by crop type and the long‐term N fertilizer rate , 1998 .

[5]  E. Lord,et al.  Effect of nitrogen inputs to cereals on nitrate leaching from sandy soils , 1998 .

[6]  Andrew P. Whitmore,et al.  Simulation of solute leaching in soils of differing permeabilities , 1991 .

[7]  L. Bergström,et al.  Effects of differentiated applications of fertilizer N on leaching losses and distribution of inorganic N in the soil , 1986, Plant and Soil.

[8]  P. Barraclough,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology II. The application to N fertilizer use in winter wheat production systems , 2004 .

[9]  J. Djurhuus,et al.  Comparison of ceramic suction cups and KC1 extraction for the determination of nitrate in soil , 1995 .

[10]  P. Jansson,et al.  Modelling water flow, nitrogen uptake and production for wheat , 1991, Fertilizer research.

[11]  Sofia Delin,et al.  Within-field Variations in Grain Protein Content—Relationships to Yield and Soil Nitrogen and Consistency in Maps Between Years , 2004, Precision Agriculture.

[12]  B. Stenberg,et al.  Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy compared with soil clay and organic matter content for estimating within-field variation in N uptake in cereals , 2007, Plant and Soil.

[13]  Bruno Mary,et al.  Nitrate leaching in intensive agriculture in Northern France: Effect of farming practices, soils and crop rotations , 2005 .

[14]  K. Goulding Nitrate leaching from arable and horticultural land , 2000 .

[15]  L. Bakken Denitrification under different cultivated plants: effects of soil moisture tension, nitrate concentration, and photosynthetic activity , 1988, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[16]  J. Ritchie,et al.  A strategic and tactical management approach to select optimal N fertilizer rates for wheat in a spatially variable field , 2011 .

[17]  J. Zadoks A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals , 1974 .

[18]  H. Johnsson Nitrogen and water dynamics in arable soil. A modelling approach emphasizing nitrogen losses. , 1990 .

[19]  S. Delin,et al.  Management Zones Classified With Respect to Drought and Waterlogging , 2005, Precision Agriculture.