Rewards for Patents and Inventor Behaviors in Industrial Research and Development

This study investigates the effects of rewards in a research and development (R&D) setting in which employees’ inventive efforts lead to patented inventions. Pay for performance (PFP) for inventions is associated with two challenges: Low-quality inventions may be rewarded (false positives), and high-quality inventions may be overlooked (false negatives). Building on previous findings regarding the motivational and informational effects of rewards, we use social identity theory to predict that different types of inventors react differently to such false positive and false negative information. Specifically, we hypothesize that PFP that produces false positives has detrimental effects on corporate inventors with a taste for science, who are motivated by scientific prestige, reputation, and intellectual curiosity. The empirical results from survey data related to 3,995 inventor–patent pairs show that, for this particular group of inventors, false positives are associated with reduced effort in research activ...

[1]  Lynda Aiman-Smith,et al.  Conducting Studies of Decision Making in Organizational Contexts: A Tutorial for Policy-Capturing and Other Regression-Based Techniques , 2002 .

[2]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Used, Blocking and Sleeping Patents: Empirical Evidence from a Large-Scale Inventor Survey , 2016 .

[3]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Selective Intervention and Internal Hybrids : Interpreting and Learning from the Rise and Decline of the Oticon Spaghetti Organization , 2001 .

[4]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[5]  David P. Lepak,et al.  EMPLOYEE ATTRIBUTIONS OF THE “WHY” OF HR PRACTICES: THEIR EFFECTS ON EMPLOYEE ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS, AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION , 2008 .

[6]  C. Trevor,et al.  Reconsidering Pay Dispersion's Effect on the Performance of Interdependent Work: Reconciling Sorting and Pay Inequality , 2012 .

[7]  Dirk Sliwka,et al.  Multitasking and the Benefits of Objective Performance Measurement - Evidence from a Field Experiment , 2013 .

[8]  Michael Roach,et al.  A Taste for Science? PhD Scientists’ Academic Orientation and Self-Selection into Research Careers in Industry , 2010 .

[9]  Cornelius J. König,et al.  Personnel selection as a signaling game. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  L. Stanca,et al.  Judicial Errors and Crime Deterrence: Theory and Experimental Evidence , 2009, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[11]  Karin Hoisl,et al.  Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey , 2007 .

[12]  M. Spence.  Job Market Signaling , 1973 .

[13]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  Cognitive-experiential self-theory. , 1998 .

[14]  B. Gustin,et al.  Charisma, Recognition, and the Motivation of Scientists , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  D. Harhoff,et al.  The Value of European Patents , 2008 .

[16]  Ingo Weller,et al.  Understanding voluntary turnover: Path-specific job satisfaction effects and the importance of unsolicited job offers. , 2008 .

[17]  Gustavo Manso,et al.  Is Pay-for-Performance Detrimental to Innovation? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[18]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  Charles L. Hulin,et al.  Alternative opportunities and withdrawal decisions: Empirical and theoretical discrepancies and an integration. , 1985 .

[20]  E. Lazear,et al.  Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-Technology Firms , 2006 .

[22]  Brian L. Connelly,et al.  Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment , 2011 .

[23]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[24]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community , 2007 .

[25]  J. Shaw.  Pay Dispersion, Sorting, and Organizational Performance , 2015 .

[26]  J. Battilana,et al.  Harnessing Productive Tensions in Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Work Integration Social Enterprises , 2014 .

[27]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  Best Practice Recommendations for Designing and Implementing Experimental Vignette Methodology Studies , 2014 .

[28]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Uncertainty and the size distribution of rewards from innovation , 2000 .

[29]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[30]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational, and Goal-Based Perspectives , 1995 .

[31]  J. Shaw.  Pay Dispersion , 2014 .

[32]  Lamar Pierce,et al.  The Psychological Costs of Pay-for-Performance: Implications for the Strategic Compensation of Employees , 2011 .

[33]  Jayesh Prasad,et al.  One size does not fit all: Managing IT employees' employment arrangements , 2007 .

[34]  Benn Lawson,et al.  Innovator'S Dilemma , 2015 .

[35]  Fiona E. Murray.  The Oncomouse That Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies as a Source of Distinction at the Boundary of Overlapping Institutions1 , 2010, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Them Tick? Employee Motives and Firm Innovation , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[37]  Marco S. Giarratana,et al.  How and when should companies retain their human capital? Contracts, incentives and human resource implications , 2010 .

[38]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  Nancy H. Leonard,et al.  Work Motivation: The Incorporation of Self-Concept-Based Processes , 1999 .

[40]  L. Fleming.  Breakthroughs and the ¿Long Tail¿ of Innovation , 2007 .

[41]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[43]  H. Tajfel.  Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[44]  Anthony J. Nyberg,et al.  Pay-for-Performance’s Effect on Future Employee Performance , 2016 .

[45]  Karin Hoisl,et al.  Institutionalized Incentives for Ingenuity – Patent Value and the German Employees’ Inventions Act , 2007 .

[46]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Justice , 2005 .

[47]  P. Hanges,et al.  A network model of organizational climate: Friendship clusters, subgroup agreement, and climate schemas , 2008 .

[48]  Joel Podolny,et al.  Organizing Contests for Status: The Matthew Effect vs. the Mark Effect , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[49]  G. Veigh.  Pay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological View , 1972 .

[50]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  Equity theory: A review and critique. , 1969 .

[51]  Axel Ockenfels,et al.  Bonus Payments and Reference Point Violations , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[52]  A. Rustichini,et al.  A Fine is a Price , 2000, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[53]  R. S. Meyers.  Managing With Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations , 1992 .

[54]  R. Garud,et al.  Perspectives on Innovation Processes , 2013 .

[55]  L. Putterman,et al.  Judicial Error and Cooperation , 2014 .

[56]  Raffaele Conti,et al.  Do non‐competition agreements lead firms to pursue risky R&D projects? , 2014 .

[57]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings , 1996 .

[58]  L. Marchegiani,et al.  Loss Averse Agents and Lenient Supervisors in Performance Appraisal , 2016 .

[59]  L. Stanca,et al.  Mis-judging merit: the effects of adjudication errors in contests , 2016, Experimental Economics.

[60]  Frank J. Landy,et al.  The measurement of work performance : methods, theory and applications / Frank J. Landy, James L. Farr , 1983 .

[61]  F. Crosby.  Relative deprivation in organizational settings. , 1984 .

[62]  T. Pettigrew,et al.  Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique , 1984 .

[63]  Robert Dur,et al.  Employee Recognition and Performance: A Field Experiment , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[64]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes , 2000 .

[65]  Adam J. Wowak,et al.  A model of person‐pay interaction: how executives vary in their responses to compensation arrangements , 2010 .

[66]  J. Hicks,et al.  The economics of science , 1996 .

[67]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[68]  Kathleen E. Fite.  Book Review: Pink, D.H. (2009). Drive: The Surprising Truth about What Motivates Us , 2010 .

[69]  D. Bowen,et al.  Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System , 2004 .

[70]  Anthony J. Nyberg,et al.  Stargazing: an integrative conceptual review, theoretical reconciliation, and extension for star employee research. , 2015, The Journal of applied psychology.

[71]  A. F. Chalmers,et al.  What Is This Thing Called Science , 1976 .

[72]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[73]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation Crowding Theory: A Survey of Empirical Evidence , 2000 .

[74]  Barry Gerhart,et al.  Personnel psychology: performance evaluation and pay for performance. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[75]  P. Hom,et al.  Challenging conventional wisdom about who quits: revelations from corporate America. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[76]  Michael A. Campion,et al.  A High Performance Work Practices Taxonomy , 2013 .

[77]  E. Shih,et al.  WHEN DOES INCENTIVE COMPENSATION MOTIVATE MANAGERIAL BEHAVIORS? AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE FIT BETWEEN INCENTIVE COMPENSATION, EXECUTIVE CORE SELF-EVALUATION, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 2012 .

[78]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  Reprinted Article The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995 , 2009 .

[79]  Flore Bridoux,et al.  Heterogeneous Motives and the Collective Creation of Value , 2011 .

[80]  J. S. Adams,et al.  TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF INEQUITY. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[81]  Ning Li,et al.  The Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior: The Role of Personality, Higher-Order Goals, and Job Characteristics , 2012 .

[82]  Ingrid Smithey Fulmer,et al.  6 Pay and Performance: Individuals, Groups, and Executives , 2009 .

[83]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[84]  Matt Marx,et al.  Mobility, Skills, and the Michigan Non-Compete Experiment , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[85]  Karin Hoisl,et al.  It's a Man's Job: Income and the Gender Gap in Industrial Research , 2017, Manag. Sci..

[86]  Canice Prendergast.  Intrinsic Motivation and Incentives , 2008 .

[87]  M. Bishop.  What is this thing called Science , 1996 .

[88]  J. Thibaut,et al.  Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis , 1976 .

[89]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? , 1994 .

[90]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science , 2011 .

[91]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[92]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[93]  Dirk Sliwka,et al.  The Complementary Use of Experiments and Field Data to Evaluate Management Practices: The Case of Subjective Performance Evaluations , 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[94]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Envy, Comparison Costs, and the Economic Theory of the Firm , 2006 .

[95]  R. Mudambi,et al.  Professional Guilds, Tension and Knowledge Management , 2009 .

[96]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis.  Don't Fence Me in: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[97]  R. Coff.  Human Assets and Management Dilemmas: Coping With Hazards On the Road to Resource-Based Theory , 1997 .

[98]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  Relative Deprivation , 2012, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[99]  Justin M. Berg.  Balancing on the Creative Highwire , 2016 .

[100]  Marco S. Giarratana,et al.  The relationship between knowledge sourcing and fear of imitation , 2014 .

[101]  Peter Mühlemeyer.  R&D – Personnel Management by Incentive Management: Results of an Empirical Survey in Research & Development , 1992 .

[102]  B. Gerhart,et al.  Pay, Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation, Performance, and Creativity in the Workplace: Revisiting Long-Held Beliefs , 2015 .

[103]  David Kryscynski,et al.  Rethinking Sustained Competitive Advantage from Human Capital , 2012 .

[104]  Keith Randle,et al.  Rewarding Failure: operating a performance-related pay system in pharmaceutical research , 1997 .

[105]  J. Cameron,et al.  Reinforcement, Reward, and Intrinsic Motivation: A Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[106]  B. Verspagen,et al.  The size distribution of innovations revisited: an application of extreme value statistics to citation and value measures of patent significance , 2007 .

[107]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[108]  Philip J. Cook,et al.  The Winner-Take-All Society: Why the Few at the Top Get So Much More Than the Rest of Us , 1996 .