Towards an understanding of joint roughness

SummaryIt is argued that the currently available joint models are incapable of accurate predictions of joint shear behaviour without resorting to substantial levels of empiricism. This is because these models fail to adequately quantify joint roughness, or appreciate the importance of scale. A novel approach, which uses fractal geometry to investigate joint roughness, is described. This approach goes beyond describing the “symptoms” of roughness and seeks to find the “cause”. In the application of this approach, the concepts of fractal geometry, fractal dimension and self similarity are described and used as a framework to formulate a statistically based and practical model for the characterisation of rock joint roughness. Important relationships between the fractal dimension and the more useful statistical parameters of standard deviation of both asperity angles and asperity heights are derived. These relationships not only provide a useful, working method for quantifying joint roughness, but are also shown to provide a basis for understanding the Barton empirical JRC-JCS model. In addition, the fractal model is able to provide conceptual models for the effects of normal stress on the shear behaviour of joints and the scale-dependence of joints.

[1]  J. Carr,et al.  The fractal dimension as a measure of the roughness of rock discontinuity profiles , 1990 .

[2]  Nick Barton,et al.  Experimental studies of scale effects on the shear behaviour of rock joints , 1981 .

[3]  D. Cruden,et al.  ESTIMATING JOINT ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENTS , 1979 .

[4]  Nick Barton,et al.  Review of predictive capabilities of JRC-JCS model in engineering practice , 1991 .

[5]  N. Barton,et al.  FUNDAMENTALS OF ROCK JOINT DEFORMATION , 1983 .

[6]  W. R. Dearman,et al.  Characterization of rock joint surfaces by fractal dimension , 1987 .

[7]  Norbert R. Morgenstern,et al.  THE ULTIMATE FRICTIONAL RESISTANCE OF ROCK DISCONTINUITIES , 1979 .

[8]  J. Logan,et al.  The effect of normal stress on the real area of contact during frictional sliding in rocks , 1986 .

[9]  B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractals: Form, Chance and Dimension , 1978 .

[10]  Adrian F. Williams,et al.  The design and performance of piles socketed into weak rock , 1980 .

[11]  Roger T. Stevens.  Fractal Programming in Turbo Pascal , 1990 .

[12]  Xianbin Yu,et al.  Joint profiles and their roughness parameters , 1991 .

[13]  N. Barton,et al.  The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice , 1977 .

[14]  M. J. Reeves,et al.  Rock surface roughness and frictional strength , 1985 .

[15]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[16]  Elfatih Mohamed Ali,et al.  Statistical representation of joint roughness , 1978 .

[17]  B. Mandelbrot.  Self-Affine Fractals and Fractal Dimension , 1985 .

[18]  L F Richardson,et al.  The problem of contiguity : An appendix to statistics of deadly quarrels , 1961 .

[19]  Mark Randolph,et al.  A model for rock interfacial behaviour , 1992 .

[20]  F. Patton.  Multiple Modes of Shear Failure In Rock , 1966 .

[21]  Stephen R. Brown.  A note on the description of surface roughness using fractal dimension , 1987 .

[22]  B. H. Kaye.  A random walk through fractal dimensions , 1989 .

[23]  M. M. Koura,et al.  The effect of surface parameters on friction , 1981 .

[24]  James R. Carr,et al.  Rock Mass Classification Using Fractal Dimension , 1987 .

[25]  Ian W. Johnston,et al.  A mechanistically-based model for rough rock joints , 1994 .

[26]  R. C. Speck,et al.  APPLICABILITY OF FRACTAL CHARACTERIZATION AND MODELLING TO ROCK JOINT PROFILES , 1992 .

[27]  N. Rengers,et al.  INFLUENCE OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS ON THE FRICTION PROPERTIES OF ROCK PLANES , 1970 .