Some consequences of assuming simple patterns for the treatment effect over time in a linear mixed model

Linear mixed models are often used for the analysis of data from clinical trials with repeated quantitative outcomes. This paper considers linear mixed models where a particular form is assumed for the treatment effect, in particular constant over time or proportional to time. For simplicity, we assume no baseline covariates and complete post-baseline measures, and we model arbitrary mean responses for the control group at each time. For the variance-covariance matrix, we consider an unstructured model, a random intercepts model and a random intercepts and slopes model. We show that the treatment effect estimator can be expressed as a weighted average of the observed time-specific treatment effects, with weights depending on the covariance structure and the magnitude of the estimated variance components. For an assumed constant treatment effect, under the random intercepts model, all weights are equal, but in the random intercepts and slopes and the unstructured models, we show that some weights can be negative: thus, the estimated treatment effect can be negative, even if all time-specific treatment effects are positive. Our results suggest that particular models for the treatment effect combined with particular covariance structures may result in estimated treatment effects of unexpected magnitude and/or direction. Methods are illustrated using a Parkinson's disease trial.

[1]  Ian R. White,et al.  Randomized clinical trials with added rescue medication: some approaches to their analysis and interpretation , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  Geert Molenberghs,et al.  Missing Data in Clinical Studies , 2007 .

[3]  P. Diggle An approach to the analysis of repeated measurements. , 1988, Biometrics.

[4]  N M Laird,et al.  Intention-to-treat analyses for incomplete repeated measures data. , 1996, Biometrics.

[5]  G Molenberghs,et al.  Parametric models for incomplete continuous and categorical longitudinal data , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[6]  Tapabrata Maiti,et al.  Analysis of Longitudinal Data (2nd ed.) (Book) , 2004 .

[7]  E Lesaffre,et al.  The detection of residual serial correlation in linear mixed models. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  M. Kenward,et al.  Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. , 1997, Biometrics.

[9]  A. Korczyn,et al.  A 3-year randomized trial of ropinirole and bromocriptine in early Parkinson’s disease , 1999, Neurology.

[10]  J. Ware,et al.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data. , 1982, Biometrics.

[11]  G Molenberghs,et al.  Identifying the types of missingness in quality of life data from clinical trials. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  S. Senn,et al.  Repeated measures in clinical trials: analysis using mean summary statistics and its implications for design. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  Michael G. Kenward,et al.  Missing data in randomised controlled trials: a practical guide , 2007 .

[14]  S G Thompson,et al.  Parametric modelling of cost data in medical studies , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  Geert Verbeke,et al.  Flexible modelling of the covariance matrix in a linear random effects model , 2000 .

[16]  N M Laird,et al.  Missing data in longitudinal studies. , 1988, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  H. Goldstein Multilevel Statistical Models , 2006 .

[18]  P. Diggle,et al.  Analysis of Longitudinal Data , 2003 .

[19]  S J Pocock,et al.  Linearly divergent treatment effects in clinical trials with repeated measures: efficient analysis using summary statistics. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.