Measuring auditory selective attention using frequency tagging

Frequency tagging of sensory inputs (presenting stimuli that fluctuate periodically at rates to which the cortex can phase lock) has been used to study attentional modulation of neural responses to inputs in different sensory modalities. For visual inputs, the visual steady-state response (VSSR) at the frequency modulating an attended object is enhanced, while the VSSR to a distracting object is suppressed. In contrast, the effect of attention on the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) is inconsistent across studies. However, most auditory studies analyzed results at the sensor level or used only a small number of equivalent current dipoles to fit cortical responses. In addition, most studies of auditory spatial attention used dichotic stimuli (independent signals at the ears) rather than more natural, binaural stimuli. Here, we asked whether these methodological choices help explain discrepant results. Listeners attended to one of two competing speech streams, one simulated from the left and one from the right, that were modulated at different frequencies. Using distributed source modeling of magnetoencephalography results, we estimate how spatially directed attention modulates the ASSR in neural regions across the whole brain. Attention enhances the ASSR power at the frequency of the attended stream in contralateral auditory cortex. The attended-stream modulation frequency also drives phase-locked responses in the left (but not right) precentral sulcus (lPCS), a region implicated in control of eye gaze and visual spatial attention. Importantly, this region shows no phase locking to the distracting stream. Results suggest that the lPCS in engaged in an attention-specific manner. Modeling results that take account of the geometry and phases of the cortical sources phase locked to the two streams (including hemispheric asymmetry of lPCS activity) help to explain why past ASSR studies of auditory spatial attention yield seemingly contradictory results.

[1]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Attention‐related modulation of activity in primary and secondary auditory cortex , 1997, Neuroreport.

[2]  D. Mountain,et al.  The envelope following response: Scalp potentials elicited in the mongolian gerbil using sinusoidally AM acoustic signals , 1992, Hearing Research.

[3]  Yoshitaka Nakajima,et al.  Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound Albert S. Bregman , 1992 .

[4]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Signal-space projection method for separating MEG or EEG into components , 1997, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[5]  Adrian K. C. Lee,et al.  Using neuroimaging to understand the cortical mechanisms of auditory selective attention , 2014, Hearing Research.

[6]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Frequency‐Specific Audiometry Using Steady‐State Responses , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[7]  S. Makeig,et al.  A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  S. Taulu,et al.  Applications of the signal space separation method , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  C. Bruce,et al.  Primate frontal eye fields. II. Physiological and anatomical correlates of electrically evoked eye movements. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Franco Lepore,et al.  Neuromagnetic auditory steady-state responses to amplitude modulated sounds following dichotic or monaural presentation , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  Y. Okada,et al.  Genesis of MEG signals in a mammalian CNS structure. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  M. Corbetta,et al.  The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind , 2008, Neuron.

[13]  Lee M. Miller,et al.  Auditory attentional control and selection during cocktail party listening. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  A. Herdman.  Neuroimaging Evidence for Top-Down Maturation of Selective Auditory Attention , 2011, Brain Topography.

[15]  D. Thomson,et al.  Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis , 1982, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[16]  M. Woldorff,et al.  The neural circuitry underlying the executive control of auditory spatial attention , 2007, Brain Research.

[17]  I. Nelken.  Demonstrations of Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound by Albert S. Bregman and Pierre A. Ahad, MIT Press, 1996. £15.95 CD , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  T W Picton,et al.  Human Auditory Steady‐State Response During General Anesthesia , 1990, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[19]  H. Pollak,et al.  Prolate spheroidal wave functions, fourier analysis and uncertainty — III: The dimension of the space of essentially time- and band-limited signals , 1962 .

[20]  B. Shinn-Cunningham.  Object-based auditory and visual attention , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  J. Simon,et al.  Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Selective attention enhances the auditory 40-Hz transient response in humans , 1993, Nature.

[23]  G Calhoun,et al.  Brain-computer interfaces based on the steady-state visual-evoked response. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[24]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Sequence-independent segmentation of magnetic resonance images , 2004, NeuroImage.

[25]  Jennifer L. Smart,et al.  Auditory steady-state responses. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[26]  Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Auditory Selective Attention Reveals Preparatory Activity in Different Cortical Regions for Selection Based on Source Location and Source Pitch , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[27]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[28]  Teemu Rinne,et al.  Functional Maps of Human Auditory Cortex: Effects of Acoustic Features and Attention , 2009, PloS one.

[29]  L. Simo,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of anticipatory behavior: dissociation between sensory-driven and memory-driven systems. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  T W Picton,et al.  Human auditory steady-state evoked potentials during selective attention. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[31]  E. Vogel,et al.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[32]  Eric Larson,et al.  Mapping cortical dynamics using simultaneous MEG/EEG and anatomically-constrained minimum-norm estimates: an auditory attention example. , 2012, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[33]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Visual spatial attention tracking using high-density SSVEP data for independent brain-computer communication , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[34]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[35]  B Giesbrecht,et al.  Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention , 2003, NeuroImage.

[36]  Naoaki Tanaka,et al.  Functional Mapping with Simultaneous MEG and EEG. , 2010, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[37]  Robert J. Zatorre,et al.  Spatial Localization after Excision of Human Auditory Cortex , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Effects of Selective Attention on the Electrophysiological Representation of Concurrent Sounds in the Human Auditory Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[40]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[41]  M. Hämäläinen,et al.  Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Selective Attention in Normal and Impaired Hearing , 2008, Trends in amplification.

[43]  Christopher J. Plack,et al.  The Frequency Following Response (FFR) May Reflect Pitch-Bearing Information But is Not a Direct Representation of Pitch , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[44]  Etienne Olivier,et al.  Contribution of the Monkey Frontal Eye Field to Covert Visual Attention , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  P. Boersma.  Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.05) , 2009 .

[46]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[47]  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Localizing nearby sound sources in a classroom: binaural room impulse responses. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  R Hari,et al.  Evidence for cortical origin of the 40 Hz auditory evoked response in man. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[49]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds , 2008, Hearing Research.

[50]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[51]  Lenny A. Varghese,et al.  Quantifying attentional modulation of auditory-evoked cortical responses from single-trial electroencephalography , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[52]  J. Simon,et al.  Neural coding of continuous speech in auditory cortex during monaural and dichotic listening. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  E. Halgren,et al.  Dynamic Statistical Parametric Mapping Combining fMRI and MEG for High-Resolution Imaging of Cortical Activity , 2000, Neuron.

[54]  W. Krieg.  Functional Neuroanatomy , 1953, Springer Series in Experimental Entomology.

[55]  E. Yund,et al.  Attentional modulation of human auditory cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  Winfried Schlee,et al.  Top-Down Modulation of the Auditory Steady-State Response in a Task-Switch Paradigm , 2008, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[57]  H. Barbas,et al.  Organization of afferent input to subdivisions of area 8 in the rhesus monkey , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[58]  C Pantev,et al.  Stimulus induced desynchronization of human auditory 40-Hz steady-state responses. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[59]  M. Mesulam.  A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect , 1981, Annals of neurology.

[60]  Katherine M. Armstrong,et al.  Visual and oculomotor selection: links, causes and implications for spatial attention , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  N. Graziane,et al.  Electrophysiological Analysis of Synaptic Transmission , 2015, Neuromethods.

[62]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[63]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Human Neuroscience , 2022 .

[64]  Hari M. Bharadwaj,et al.  A comparison of spectral magnitude and phase-locking value analyses of the frequency-following response to complex tones. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[65]  Shigeyuki Kuwada,et al.  Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones , 1986, Hearing Research.

[66]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[67]  G. Mangun,et al.  Author ' s personal copy Research Report fMRI evidence for both generalized and specialized components of attentional control , 2007 .

[68]  Juha Salmi,et al.  Orienting and maintenance of spatial attention in audition and vision: multimodal and modality-specific brain activations , 2007, Brain Structure and Function.

[69]  T. Picton,et al.  Human auditory steady-state responses: Respuestas auditivas de estado estable en humanos , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[70]  D. Slepian,et al.  Prolate spheroidal wave functions, fourier analysis and uncertainty — II , 1961 .

[71]  T W Picton,et al.  Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[72]  E. C. Cmm,et al.  on the Recognition of Speech, with , 2008 .

[73]  D. V. Essen,et al.  Surface-Based and Probabilistic Atlases of Primate Cerebral Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[74]  C Pantev,et al.  A high-precision magnetoencephalographic study of human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[75]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[76]  C Pantev,et al.  Right hemispheric laterality of human 40 Hz auditory steady-state responses. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[77]  P. Boersma.  Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 4.4.24) , 2006 .

[78]  Chang-Hwan Im,et al.  Classification of selective attention to auditory stimuli: Toward vision-free brain–computer interfacing , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.