On statistical analysis of forensic DNA: theory, methods and computer programs.

Statistics plays an important role in evaluating the evidential weight of forensic DNA. In this paper, general statistical principles for forensic DNA analysis are presented. We introduce the theory and methods for the statistical assessment in kinship determination and DNA mixture evaluation. In particular, analytical formulas for testing for biological relationship among three individuals and for assessing the DNA mixture evidence in the case of multiple subdivided ethnic groups are developed. Two user-friendly computer programs are demonstrated to exhibit their wide applicability in tackling with complex kinship/paternity and mixture problems. The EasyDNA program can solve a complicated paternity case in 1 min.

[1]  Wing K Fung.  User-friendly programs for easy calculations in paternity testing and kinship determinations. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[2]  Franco Taroni,et al.  Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists , 2004 .

[3]  J. Buckleton,et al.  Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation , 2004 .

[4]  Allele frequencies for nine STR loci in Beijing Chinese. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[5]  W. Bär,et al.  Biostatistical evaluation of mixed stains with contributors of different ethnic origin , 1999, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[6]  N. Fukshansky,et al.  Biostatistics for mixed stains: the case of tested relatives of a non-tested suspect , 2000, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[7]  J M Curran,et al.  Interpreting DNA mixtures in structured populations. , 1999, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  W. Bär,et al.  DNA mixtures: biostatistics for mixed stains with haplotypic genetic markers , 2005, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[9]  Yue-Qing Hu,et al.  Testing for kinship in a subdivided population. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[10]  Wing K. Fung,et al.  Interpreting DNA Mixtures with Related Contributors in Subdivided Populations , 2004 .

[11]  K. Ayres,et al.  Relatedness testing in subdivided populations. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[12]  C. Brenner.  Symbolic kinship program. , 1997, Genetics.

[13]  Wing K. Fung,et al.  Evaluating forensic DNA mixtures with contributors of different structured ethnic origins: a computer software , 2003, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[14]  C. T. Chiu,et al.  Population data for 12 STR loci in Hong Kong Chinese , 2001, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[15]  B. Weir,et al.  Interpreting DNA mixtures. , 1997, Journal of forensic sciences.

[16]  C. Li,et al.  The Derivation of Joint Distribution and Correlation between Relatives by the Use of Stochastic Matrices , 1954 .

[17]  Phillip I. Good,et al.  Applying Statistics in the Courtroom , 2002 .

[18]  D J Balding,et al.  DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. , 1994, Forensic science international.

[19]  Wing K. Fung,et al.  Interpreting forensic DNA mixtures: allowing for uncertainty in population substructure and dependence , 2000 .

[20]  W. Fung,et al.  Interpreting DNA mixtures with the presence of relatives , 2003, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[21]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Prove It with Figures , 1997 .

[22]  Twk Fung,et al.  Evaluating mixed DNA profiles with the presence of relatives: Theory, method, and computer software , 2005 .

[23]  T Egeland,et al.  A computerised method for calculating the probability of pedigrees from genetic data. , 1997, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[24]  Sen. M.I.,et al.  Statistical Science in the Courtroom , 2001 .