Factors Associated with Development of Speech Perception Skills in Children Implanted by Age Five

Objective This study investigated factors contributing to speech perception outcomes in children with prelingual deafness after 4 to 7 yr of multichannel cochlear implant use. The analysis controlled for the effects of child, family and implant characteristics so that educational factors most conducive to maximum implant benefit could be identified. Design One hundred eighty-one 8- and 9-yr-old children from across the US and Canada who received a cochlear implant by age 5 were administered a battery of speech perception tests. Type and amount of educational intervention since implantation constituted the independent variables. Characteristics of the child, the family, and the implant itself constituted intervening variables. A series of multiple regression analyses determined the amount of variance in speech perception ability accounted for by the intervening variables and the amount of additional variance attributable to independent variables. Results The children achieved an average level of about 50% open-set speech perception through listening alone and almost 80% through lipreading and listening together, but with scores for individual children ranging from 0 to 100% correct. Over half of the variance in speech perception scores was predicted by characteristics of the child, family, implant and educational program. Significant predictors of good speech perception included greater nonverbal intelligence, smaller family size, longer use of the updated SPEAK/CIS processing strategy, a fully active electrode array, greater electrical dynamic range between threshold and maximum comfort level, and greater growth of loudness with increasing stimulus intensity. After the variance due to these variables was controlled, the primary rehabilitative factor associated with good speech perception skill development was educational emphasis on oral-aural communication. Conclusions Children with profound hearing loss achieved unprecedented levels of speech perception skill 4 to 7 yr after cochlear implantation. Use of an updated speech processor, such as SPEAK, contributed significantly to improved speech perception skills, even in children who were initially fitted with an earlier strategy, such as M-PEAK. In addition, the audiologist who programs the cochlear implant makes an important contribution to the child’s successful outcome with the device. A well-fitted map, as evidenced by a wide dynamic range and optimal growth of loudness characteristics, contributed substantially to the child’s ability to hear speech. Finally, the classroom communication mode used in the child’s school affects speech perception outcome. Children whose educational program emphasized dependence on speech and audition for communication were better able to use the information provided by the implant to understand speech.

[1]  S. B. Chin,et al.  Relationships among types of speech intelligibility in pediatric users of cochlear implants. , 2001, Journal of communication disorders.

[2]  S. Staller,et al.  Speech production performance in children with multichannel cochlear implants. , 1991, The American journal of otology.

[3]  P R Kileny,et al.  Effects of channel number and place of stimulation on performance with the Cochlear Corporation multichannel implant. , 1992, The American journal of otology.

[4]  Lisa Davidson,et al.  Effects of Communication Mode on Skills of Long-Term Cochlear Implant Users , 2000, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[5]  C. Smith,et al.  Residual hearing and speech production in deaf children. , 1975, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  A E Geers,et al.  Speech perception and production skills of students with impaired hearing from oral and total communication education settings. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  P C Loizou,et al.  The Effect of Reduced Dynamic Range on Speech Understanding: Implications for Patients with Cochlear Implants , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[8]  N. McGarr,et al.  The intelligibility of deaf speech to experienced and inexperienced listeners. , 1983, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  A. Geers,et al.  Acoustic Characteristics of the Speech of Young Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison with Normal-Hearing Age-Mates , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[10]  R. Miyamoto,et al.  Speech perception and speech production skills of children with multichannel cochlear implants. , 1996, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[11]  D. Garstecki,et al.  Older adult performance on the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired: gender difference. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  J. Tomblin,et al.  A comparison of language achievement in children with cochlear implants and children using hearing aids. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[13]  M. Dorman,et al.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  E A Tobey,et al.  Consonant production in children receiving a multichannel cochlear implant. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[15]  Statistical Analysis and Interpretation in a Study of Prelingually Deaf Children Implanted Before Five Years of Age , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[16]  Lutman Me,et al.  Early communicative behavior in young children receiving cochlear implants: factor analysis of turn-taking and gaze orientation. , 1995 .

[17]  N. Tye‐Murray Preparing for communication interactions: the value of anticipatory strategies for adults with hearing impairment. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[18]  M W Skinner,et al.  Comparison of two methods for selecting minimum stimulation levels used in programming the Nucleus 22 cochlear implant. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[19]  P J Blamey,et al.  A 4-year investigation into phonetic inventory development in young cochlear implant users. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[20]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  Consonant production by children with multichannel cochlear implants or hearing aids. , 1995, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[21]  A. Gunkel,et al.  Dendritic Cells in Selected Head and Neck Tumors , 2000, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[22]  M. Svirsky,et al.  The Effects of Processor Strategy on the Speech Perception Performance of Pediatric Nucleus Multichannel Cochlear Implant Users , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[23]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Factors Predicting Postoperative Sentence Scores in Postlinguistically Deaf Adult Cochlear Implant Patients , 1992, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[24]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  Speech Intelligibility of Children with Cochlear Implants. , 1994 .

[25]  T. Nikolopoulos,et al.  Speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation. , 1998, The American journal of otology.

[26]  M. Lutman,et al.  Approach to Communication, Speech Perception and Intelligibility after Paediatric Cochlear Implantation , 2000, British journal of audiology.

[27]  A. Geers,et al.  Background and Educational Characteristics of Prelingually Deaf Children Implanted by Five Years of Age , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[28]  E. Tobey,et al.  Influence of communication mode on speech intelligibility and syntactic structure of sentences in profoundly hearing impaired French children implanted between 5 and 9 years of age. , 1998, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[29]  H. Fukuda,et al.  Voice prognosis after liquid and solid silicone injection. , 1991, American journal of otolaryngology.

[30]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  Speech intelligibility of implanted children. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[31]  P J Blamey,et al.  Phonetic inventory development in young cochlear implant users 6 years postoperation. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[32]  E. Tobey,et al.  Speech perception skills and speech production intelligibility in French children with prelingual deafness and cochlear implants. , 1997, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[33]  L. Shriberg,et al.  Reliability studies in broad and narrow phonetic transcription , 1991 .

[34]  R T Miyamoto,et al.  Improvements in speech perception by children with profound prelingual hearing loss: effects of device, communication mode, and chronological age. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[35]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Lexical Effects on Spoken Word Recognition by Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[36]  M W Skinner,et al.  Identification of speech by cochlear implant recipients with the multipeak (MPEAK) and spectral peak (SPEAK) speech coding strategies II. Consonants. , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[37]  G. Woodworth,et al.  Differences in children's sound production when speaking with a cochlear implant turned on and turned off. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[38]  M. Devous,et al.  Preoperative Functional Assessment of Auditory Cortex in Adult Cochlear Implant Users , 2001, The Laryngoscope.

[39]  A. Boothroyd,et al.  Practical Implications of Cochlear Implants in Children , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[40]  D. M. Tait,et al.  Video Analysis: A Method of Assessing Changes in Preverbal and Early Linguistic Communication After Cochlear Implantation , 1993, Ear and hearing.

[41]  M. Bornstein,et al.  Representational abilities and the hearing status of child/mother dyads. , 1999, Child development.

[42]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  Speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[43]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Language Development in Profoundly Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants , 2000, Psychological science.

[44]  Philipos C. Loizou,et al.  Word Recognition by Children Listening to Speech Processed into a Small Number of Channels: Data from Normal-Hearing Children and Children with Cochlear Implants , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[45]  T. Nikolopoulos,et al.  Cochlear implants in young children: the relationship between speech perception and speech intelligibility. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[46]  N. Tye‐Murray,et al.  Effects of Talker Familiarity on Communication Breakdown in Conversations with Adult Cochlear‐Implant Users , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[47]  G. Woodworth,et al.  Acquisition of speech by children who have prolonged cochlear implant experience. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[48]  S J Norton,et al.  The effects of limiting the number of Nucleus 22 cochlear implant electrodes programmed on speech perception. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[49]  A. Geers,et al.  Factors Associated with Speech Intelligibility in Children with Cochlear Implants , 2000, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[50]  P J Blamey,et al.  Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. , 2001, Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research.