STUDY OF CRITERIA USED TO OBTAIN A SUSTAINABLE BRIDGE

The sustainable development of bridges is mainly based on meeting the three pillars of sustainability (economic, social and environmental factors) which have different goals. Each main criterion groups a large number of subcritera. Therefore, achieve a sustainable bridge is a complicate problem that involves a high number of factors in each stage of bridge life-cycle. For this reason, decision-making is a helpful process to solve the sustainability problem. The objective of this work is to review the bridge life-cycle decision-making problems that involve criteria that represent the pillars of the sustainability. While some works only consider criteria related to one or two of these pillars, the most current works consider criteria that involve all the pillars of sustainability. Furthermore, most of the works reviewed only study one stage of bridge life-cycle. This study shows the criteria used in some revised journal articles in each bridge life-cycle phase and, the multi-attribute decision-making used to achieve the sustainability. In addition, a small explanation of the obtained information will be carried out.

[1]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  A career choice problem: An example of how to use MACBETH to build a quantitative value model based on qualitative value judgments , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  The extended linear assignment method for multiple criteria decision analysis based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 2014 .

[3]  Sabah Alkass,et al.  Decision support method for multi‐criteria selection of bridge rehabilitation strategy , 2008 .

[4]  Mahdi Bitarafan,et al.  Selecting the Best Design Scenario of the Smart Structure of Bridges for Probably Future Earthquakes , 2013 .

[5]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS , 2011 .

[6]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Ali Görener,et al.  Comparing AHP and ANP: An Application of Strategic Decisions Making in a Manufacturing Company , 2012 .

[9]  Víctor Yepes,et al.  Multiobjective optimization of post-tensioned concrete box-girder road bridges considering cost, CO2 emissions, and safety , 2016 .

[10]  Víctor Yepes,et al.  A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods Applied to the Sustainable Bridge Design , 2016 .

[11]  Víctor Yepes,et al.  Structural design of precast-prestressed concrete U-beam road bridges based on embodied energy , 2016 .

[12]  Victor V. Podinovski,et al.  Optimal weights in DEA models with weight restrictions , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Przemyslaw Jakiel,et al.  FAHP model used for assessment of highway RC bridge structural and technological arrangements , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Ali Siadat,et al.  A new hesitant fuzzy analytical hierarchy process method for decision-making problems under uncertainty , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[15]  Ying Wang,et al.  Method for Selecting the Suitable Bridge Construction Projects with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information , 2011 .

[16]  Mehrdad Tamiz,et al.  Goal programming for decision making: An overview of the current state-of-the-art , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Vahid Balali,et al.  Selection of Appropriate Material, Construction Technique, and Structural System of Bridges by Use of Multicriteria Decision-Making Method , 2014 .

[18]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  Simple procedures of choice in multicriteria problems without precise information about the alternatives' values , 2010, Comput. Oper. Res..

[19]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Multi-objective design of post-tensioned concrete road bridges using artificial neural networks , 2017, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[20]  L. Simões da Silva,et al.  A probabilistic decision-making approach for the sustainable assessment of infrastructures , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Enrique Ballestero,et al.  Compromise programming: A utility-based linear-quadratic composite metric from the trade-off between achievement and balanced (non-corner) solutions , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Sustainability-informed maintenance optimization of highway bridges considering multi-attribute utility and risk attitude , 2015 .

[23]  Nang-Fei Pan,et al.  FUZZY AHP APPROACH FOR SELECTING THE SUITABLE BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION METHOD , 2008 .

[24]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  ANP Experiment for Demolition Plan Evaluation , 2014 .