This paper explores a little-understood aspect of labor markets, their spatial geography. Using data from New York State, we find teacher labor markets to be geographically very small. Teachers express preferences to teach close to where they grew up and, controlling for proximity, they prefer areas with characteristics similar to their hometown. We discuss implications of these preferences for the successful recruitment of teachers, including the potential benefits of local recruiting and training. We also discuss implications for the modeling of teacher labor markets, including the possible biases that arise in estimates of compensating differentials when distance is omitted from the analyses. This study contributes to the literature on the geography of labor markets more generally by employing data on residential location during childhood instead of current residence, which may be endogenous to job choice. © 2005 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.
[1]
Anita A. Summers.
Who Will Teach?: Policies That Matter
,
1991
.
[2]
Hope Corman,et al.
Who will teach? Policies that matter: Richard J. Murnane, Judith D. Singer, John B. Willett, James J. Kemple and Randall J. Olsen. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991. XII + 187 p
,
1993
.
[3]
Susanna Loeb,et al.
Teacher Sorting and the Plight of Urban Schools: A Descriptive Analysis
,
2002
.
[4]
Jeff Borland,et al.
Recent developments in public sector labor markets
,
1999
.
[5]
Geraldine Pratt,et al.
Dynamic Dependencies: A Geographic Investigation of Local Labor Markets*
,
1992
.
[6]
The Spatial Organization of a Local Labor Market: Employment and Residential Patterns in a Cohort of Engineering and Scientific Workers
,
1992
.