Title : Rimac : A Natural-language Dialogue System that Engages Students in Deep Reasoning

Title Page Not included in page count. Abstract Body Limit 5 pages single spaced.

[1]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  at 1 , 2004 .

[2]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  When Are Tutorial Dialogues More Effective Than Reading? , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  Sandra Katz,et al.  Going Beyond the Problem Given: How Human Tutors Use Post-Solution Discussions to Support Transfer , 2003, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[4]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  Diane J. Litman,et al.  Dialog Convergence and Learning , 2007, AIED.

[6]  Sandra Katz,et al.  Toward More Robust Learning of Physics via Reflective Dialogue Extensions , 2009 .

[7]  S. Michaels,et al.  Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic Life , 2008 .

[8]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-analysis of Findings , 1982 .

[9]  B. Bloom.  The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring , 1984 .

[10]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Cognitive Computer Tutors: Solving the Two-Sigma Problem , 2001, User Modeling.

[11]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Third generation computer tutors: learn from or ignore human tutors? , 1999, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Constructing Knowledge from Dialog in an Intelligent Tutoring System: Interactive Learning, Vicarious Learning, and Pedagogical Agents , 2004 .

[13]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  The Andes Physics Tutoring System: Lessons Learned , 2005, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[14]  Diane J. Litman,et al.  Cohesion, Semantics and Learning in Reflective Dialog , 2009 .

[15]  Diane J. Litman,et al.  Semantic Cohesion and Learning , 2008, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.