Absence of an interaction between navigational strategies based on local and distal landmarks.

In 3 experiments, rats were required to escape from a Morris pool by swimming to a submerged platform that was located at the apex of a notional, equilateral triangle with 2 different landmarks occupying the corners at the base. Training for 1 group was always conducted in view of the landmarks surrounding the pool and with the triangular array in a fixed orientation. Subjects could therefore identify the direction of the platform from a single landmark within the pool by reference to cues outside the pool or to the other landmark within the pool. Both strategies were used, and the results from additional groups revealed that the first of these strategies did not affect the acquisition of the second one.

[1]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[2]  R Biegler,et al.  Blocking in the spatial domain with arrays of discrete landmarks. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[3]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .

[4]  Alan C. Kamil,et al.  Geometric rule learning by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). , 2000 .

[5]  J Ward-Robinson,et al.  Influence of a beacon on spatial learning based on the shape of the test environment. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[6]  J. Pearce,et al.  Interaction between piloting and beacon homing by rats in a swimming pool. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[7]  G. M. Martin,et al.  Spatial disorientation blocks reliable goal location on a plus maze but does not prevent goal location in the Morris maze. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[8]  N. Mackintosh A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .

[9]  J. Pearce,et al.  Blocking in the Morris swimming pool. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[10]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[11]  J. Taube,et al.  Effects of repeated disorientation on the acquisition of spatial tasks in rats: dissociation between the appetitive radial arm maze and aversive water maze. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[12]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. , 1972 .

[13]  J. Pearce Similarity and Discrimination: A Selective Review and a Connectionist Model , 1994 .

[14]  Paul Graham,et al.  The influence of beacon-aiming on the routes of wood ants , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[15]  C. Gallistel The organization of learning , 1990 .

[16]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Searching for the center: spatial cognition in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus). , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[17]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Loss of control by a less valid or by a less salient stimulus compounded with a better predictor of reinforcement , 1977 .

[18]  J. Pearce,et al.  Absence of Overshadowing and Blocking between Landmarks and the Geometric Cues Provided by the Shape of a Test Arena , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[19]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[20]  V. D. Chamizo,et al.  Reciprocal Overshadowing between Intra-Maze and Extra-Maze Cues , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[21]  N. J. Mackintosh,et al.  Blocking and Overshadowing between Intra-Maze and Extra-Maze Cues: A Test of the Independence of Locale and Guidance Learning , 1985 .

[22]  V. D. Chamizo,et al.  Blocking in the spatial domain. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.