The information systems identity crisis

This paper presents an alternative view of the Information Systems identity crisis described recently by Benbasat and Zmud (2003). We agree with many of their observations, but we are con cerned with their prescription for IS research. We critique their discussion of errors of inclusion and exclusion in IS research and highlight the potential misinterpretations that are possible from a literal 1Ron Weber was the accepting senior editor for this paper. Iris Vessey and Rudy Hirschheim served as reviewers. reading of their comments. Our conclusion is that following Benbasat and Zmud's nomological net will result in a micro focus for IS research. The results of such a focus are potentially dangerous for the field. They could result in the elimination of IS from many academic programs. We present an alternative set of heuristics that can be used to assess what lies within the domain of IS scholar ship. We argue that the IS community has a powerful story to tell about the transformational impact of information technology. We believe that a significant portion of our research should be macro studies of the impact of IT. It is important for academic colleagues, deans, and managers to understand the transformational power of the technology. As IS researchers with deep knowl edge of the underlying artifact, we are best positioned to do such research.

[1]  Steven L. Alter.  The IS Core - XI: Sorting Out the Issues About the Core, Scope, and Identity of the IS Field , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[3]  W ZmudRobert,et al.  The identity crisis within the is discipline , 2003 .

[4]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  The IS Core - VII: Towards Information Systems as a Science of Meta-Artifacts , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Ruth A. Guthrie.  The IS Core - V: Defining the IS Core , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Daniel J. Power,et al.  The IS Core-II: The Maturing IS Discipline: Institutionalizing our Domain of Inquiry , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Steven L. Alter.  18 Reasons Why IT-Reliant Work Systems Should Replace "The IT Artifact" as the Core Subject Matter of the IS Field , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[9]  Wonseok Oh,et al.  The Impact of Electronic Commerce on Competition in the Retail Brokerage Industry , 2004 .

[10]  Wonseok Oh,et al.  The Impact of E-Commerce on Competition in the Retail Brokerage Industry , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[12]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  Multilevel Theory Building: Benefits, Barriers, and New Developments , 1999 .

[13]  Donna Dufner,et al.  The IS Core-I: Economic and Systems Engineering Approaches to IS Identity , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  Change as Crisis or Growth? Toward a Trans-disciplinary View of Information Systems as a Field of Study: A Response to Benbasat and Zmud's Call for Returning to the IT Artifact , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Crisis in the IS Field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the Discipline , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[17]  P. Candace Dean,et al.  The IS Core - III: The Core Domain Debate and the International Business Discipline: A Comparison , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  The IS Core - VIII: Defining the Core Properties of the IS Disciplines: Not Yet, Not Now , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Ron Weber,et al.  Editor's comment: still desperately seeking the IT artifact , 2003 .

[20]  Alice M. Rivlin,et al.  The economic payoff from the internet revolution , 2001 .

[21]  Ron Weber,et al.  Still desperately seeking the IT artifact , 2003 .

[22]  Carol Saunders,et al.  The IS Core - VI: Further Along the Road to the IT Artifact , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  The IS Core IX: The 3 Faces of IS Identity: Connection, Immersion, and Fusion , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Christopher P. Holland.  The IS Core - X: Information Systems Research and Practice: IT Artifact or a Multidisciplinary Subject? , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Michael H. Armacost,et al.  The Economic Payoff from the Internet Revolution: Brookings Task Force on the Internet , 2001 .

[26]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Identity, Legitimacy and the Dominant Research Paradigm: An Alternative Prescription for the IS Discipline: A Response to Benbasat and Zmud's Call for Returning to the IT Artifact , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[27]  J. Christopher Westland,et al.  The IS Core XII: Authority, Dogma, and Positive Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Donald J. McCubbrey.  The IS Core-IV: IS Research: A Third Way , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Blake Ives,et al.  Phylogeny and Power in the IS Domain: A Response to Benbasat and Zmud's Call for Returning to the IT Artifact , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  The Social Life of Information Systems Research: A Response to Benbasat and Zmud's Call for Returning to the IT Artifact , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..