Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions.

The authors investigated the hypothesis that as group tasks pose greater requirements for member interdependence, communication media that transmit more social context cues will foster group performance and satisfaction. Seventy-two 3-person groups of undergraduate students worked in either computer-mediated or face-to-face meetings on 3 tasks with increasing levels of interdependence: an idea-generation task, an intellective task, and a judgment task. Results showed few differences between computer-mediated and face-to-face groups in the quality of the work completed but large differences in productivity favoring face-to-face groups. Analysis of productivity and of members' reactions supported the predicted interaction of tasks and media, with greater discrepancies between media conditions for tasks requiring higher levels of coordination. Results are discussed in terms of the implications of using computer-mediated communications systems for group work.

[1]  F. J. Roethlisberger,et al.  Management and the Worker , 1941 .

[2]  Satterthwaite Fe.  An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. , 1946 .

[3]  S. Asch.  Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments , 1951 .

[4]  E. Trist,et al.  Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting , 1951 .

[5]  H. Guetzkow,et al.  Groups, Leadership, and Men , 1952 .

[6]  E. Thomas,et al.  Models of group problem solving. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[7]  John P. Campbell,et al.  The effect of group participation on brainstorming effectiveness for 2 industrial samples. , 1963 .

[8]  M. Argyle,et al.  EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Sociometry.

[9]  J. Singer,et al.  Some aspects of deindividuation: Identification and conformity , 1965 .

[10]  A. Kendon.  Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[11]  S Milgram,et al.  Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority , 1965 .

[12]  K. Strongman,et al.  Dominance hierarchies and conflict in eye contact , 1968 .

[13]  M. Argyle,et al.  The Effects of Visibility on Interaction in a Dyad , 1968 .

[14]  J. Hackman.  Effects of task characteristics on group products , 1968 .

[15]  P. Zimbardo.  The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. , 1969 .

[16]  G. Stephenson,et al.  INTERPERSONAL AND INTER-PARTY EXCHANGE: A LABORATORY SIMULATION OF AN INDUSTRIAL NEGOTIATION AT THE PLANT LEVEL , 1969 .

[17]  Z. Rubin.  Measurement of romantic love. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  G. D. Weeks,et al.  Studies in Interactive Communication: I. The Effects of Four Communication Modes on the Behavior of Teams During Cooperative Problem-Solving , 1972 .

[19]  I. Janis.  Victims of Groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. By Irving L. Janis. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972. viii + 276 pp. Map, illustrations, chart, notes, sources, bibliography, and index. Cloth, $7.95; paper $4.50.) , 1973 .

[20]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[21]  D. Weiss,et al.  Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments , 1975 .

[22]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[23]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[24]  C. O'Reilly,et al.  Relationships among components of credibility and communication behaviors in work units. , 1976 .

[25]  A. L. Beaman,et al.  Effects of deindividuation variables on stealing among Halloween trick-or-treaters. , 1976 .

[26]  Ederyn Williams,et al.  Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. , 1977 .

[27]  D. Rutter,et al.  The role of visual communication in synchronising conversation , 1977 .

[28]  Steven A. Lewis,et al.  Effects of visual access and orientation on the discovery of integrative bargaining alternatives , 1977 .

[29]  J. H. Davis,et al.  Progress in applied social psychology , 1981 .

[30]  Steven D. Seilheimer,et al.  Looking and Competing: Accountability and Visual Access in Integrative Bargaining , 1981 .

[31]  Melvin J. Voigt,et al.  Progress in Communication Sciences , 1982 .

[32]  Morris Bramson,et al.  How to prepare for the graduate record examination , 1982 .

[33]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. , 1983 .

[34]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[35]  Douglas K. Brotz.  Message system mores: etiquette in Laurel , 1983, TOIS.

[36]  R. Daft,et al.  A Proposed Integration among Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. , 1984 .

[37]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[38]  J. McGrath.  Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[39]  H. Foushee,et al.  Dyads and triads at 35,000 feet: Factors affecting group process and aircrew performance , 1984 .

[40]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Affect in Computer-Meditated Communication: An Experiment in Synchronous Terminal-to-Terminal Discussion , 1985, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[41]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Response Effects in the Electronic Survey , 1986 .

[42]  Erich Kirchler,et al.  The influence of member status differences and task type on group consensus and member position change , 1986 .

[43]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus , 1986 .

[44]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[45]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[46]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[47]  A. Isen,et al.  The Influence of Positive Affect and Visual Access on the Discovery of Integrative Solutions in Bilateral Negotiation , 1986 .

[48]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[49]  R. Daft,et al.  Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations , 1987 .

[50]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[51]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[52]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. , 1987 .

[53]  D. G. Pruitt,et al.  The Role of Caucusing in Community Mediation , 1988 .

[54]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making , 1988, CSUR.

[55]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making, 3: disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[56]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Technology for intellectual teamwork: perspectives on research and design , 1990 .

[57]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[58]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work , 1990 .

[59]  Joseph E. McGrath,et al.  Time matters in groups , 1990 .

[60]  Vairavan Arunachalam.  Decision aiding in multi-party transfer pricing negotiation : the effects of computer-mediated communication and structured interaction , 1991 .

[61]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[62]  Michael Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. , 1991 .

[63]  S. Weisband.  Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups , 1992 .

[64]  Bonita L. Daly,et al.  The influence of face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication channels on collective induction , 1993 .

[65]  J. McGrath,et al.  Group Task Performance and Communication Technology , 1993 .