New Vistas on Old Problems

Different observers do not have to agree on how they identify a quantum system. We explore a condition based on algorithmic complexity that allows a system to be described as an objective “element of reality.” We also suggest an experimental test of the hypothesis that any system, even much smaller than a human being, can be a quantum mechanical observer.

[1]  S. French,et al.  Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis , 2006 .

[2]  Michael Baumgartner,et al.  Regularity Theories Reassessed , 2008 .

[3]  G. Reinhardt Quantum Electrodynamics , 2013 .

[4]  Thomas D. Bontly,et al.  What is an Empirical Analysis of Causation? , 2006, Synthese.

[5]  Bell-type quantum field theories , 2004, quant-ph/0407116.

[6]  James T. Cushing,et al.  Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory Reflections on Bell's Theorem , 1989 .

[7]  Laura Ruetsche,et al.  Interpreting Quantum Theories , 2011 .

[8]  D. Bohm A SUGGESTED INTERPRETATION OF THE QUANTUM THEORY IN TERMS OF "HIDDEN" VARIABLES. II , 1952 .

[9]  L. Levin,et al.  THE COMPLEXITY OF FINITE OBJECTS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPTS OF INFORMATION AND RANDOMNESS BY MEANS OF THE THEORY OF ALGORITHMS , 1970 .

[10]  D. Albert,et al.  A quantum threat to special relativity. , 2009, Scientific American.

[11]  Peter Menzies,et al.  Probabilistic Causation and the Pre-emption Problem , 1996 .

[12]  C. Fuchs Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more) , 2002, quant-ph/0205039.

[13]  Robert W. Spekkens,et al.  Einstein, Incompleteness, and the Epistemic View of Quantum States , 2007, 0706.2661.

[14]  Tim Maudlin,et al.  Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics, Second Edition , 2002 .

[15]  C. Fuchs,et al.  Unknown Quantum States: The Quantum de Finetti Representation , 2001, quant-ph/0104088.

[16]  W. Bean Physics and Philosophy, the Revolution in Modern Science. , 1959 .

[17]  W. H. Zurek,et al.  Thermodynamic cost of computation, algorithmic complexity and the information metric , 1989, Nature.

[18]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics , 1989 .

[19]  R. Mould Experimental Test , 2008, 0801.1263.

[20]  Abraham Pais,et al.  ‘Subtle Is the Lord …’: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein by Abraham Pais (review) , 1984 .

[21]  Wesley C. Salmon,et al.  Causality and Explanation , 1998 .

[22]  P. Wurz,et al.  Direct Detection of Neutral Products from Photodissociated C60 , 1992 .

[23]  M. Kafatos Bell's theorem, quantum theory and conceptions of the universe , 1989 .

[24]  Bas C. Van Fraassen,et al.  The Charybdis of realism: Epistemological implications of bell's inequality , 1982, Synthese.

[25]  Ruediger Schack,et al.  Quantum Theory from Four of Hardy's Axioms , 2002 .

[26]  C. Fuchs QBism, the Perimeter of Quantum Bayesianism , 2010, 1003.5209.

[27]  S. Goldstein,et al.  On the Common Structure of Bohmian Mechanics and the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber Theory , 2006, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[28]  W. Heisenberg Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science , 1958 .

[29]  Vincent Lam Metaphysics of causation and physics of general relativity , 2010 .

[30]  G. N. Fleming Lorentz Invariant State Reduction, and Localization , 1988, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[31]  T. Sauer An Einstein manuscript on the EPR paradox for spin observables , 2007 .

[32]  C. Monroe,et al.  Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection , 2001, Nature.

[33]  David Wallace,et al.  Taking particle physics seriously: A critique of the algebraic approach to quantum field theory , 2011 .

[34]  M. Schlosshauer Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics , 2003, quant-ph/0312059.

[35]  Henry P. Stapp,et al.  The Undivided Universe: An ontological interpretation of Quantum Theory , 1994 .

[36]  A. Bartels Objects or Events?: Towards an Ontology for Quantum Field Theory , 1999, Philosophy of Science.

[37]  J. Sadock Speech acts , 2007 .

[38]  A. Ashtekar,et al.  New variables for classical and quantum gravity. , 1986, Physical review letters.

[39]  G. Roger,et al.  Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers , 1982 .

[40]  Meinard Kuhlmann,et al.  The Ultimate Constituents of the Material World: In Search of an Ontology for Fundamental Physics , 2010 .

[41]  M. Chiara,et al.  Philosophy of quantum mechanics , 1982 .

[42]  C. Rovelli,et al.  Relational Quantum Mechanics , 2006 .

[43]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger-state analyzer , 1998 .

[44]  Wojciech H. Zurek Decoherence, chaos, quantum-classical correspondence, and the algorithmic arrow of time , 1998 .

[45]  A. Peres When Is a Quantum Measurement? a , 1986 .

[46]  S. Psillos Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth , 1999 .

[47]  H. Price,et al.  The Time-Asymmetry of Causation , 2009 .

[48]  Randall C. Thompson,et al.  Experimental Test of Local Hidden-Variable Theories , 1976 .

[49]  Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac,et al.  The theory of gravitation in Hamiltonian form , 1958, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[50]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Going Beyond Bell’s Theorem , 2007, 0712.0921.

[51]  H. Price Time's arrow and Archimedes' point new directions for the physics of time , 1997 .

[52]  A. Brudno Entropy and the complexity of the trajectories of a dynamical system , 1978 .

[53]  S. Psillos Ramsey’s Ramsey-sentences , 2006 .

[54]  Anjan Chakravartty What you don’t know can’t hurt you: realism and the unconceived , 2008 .

[55]  M. Esfeld The Modal Nature of Structures in Ontic Structural Realism , 2009 .

[56]  M. Redhead,et al.  Quantum Field Theory for Philosophers , 1982, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[57]  M. Friedman,et al.  Dynamics of Reason Michael Friedman , 2022 .

[58]  Tim Maudlin,et al.  The Metaphysics Within Physics , 2007 .

[59]  J. Linnett,et al.  Quantum mechanics , 1975, Nature.

[60]  R. Landauer,et al.  Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process , 1961, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[61]  David Wallace,et al.  In Defence of Naiveté: The Conceptual Status of Lagrangian Quantum Field Theory , 2006, Synthese.

[62]  Grete Hermann Die naturphilosophischen Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik , 1935, Naturwissenschaften.

[63]  J. Barbour The timelessness of quantum gravity: I. The evidence from the classical theory , 1994 .

[64]  A. Grinbaum Reconstruction of Quantum Theory , 2007, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[65]  Weinfurter,et al.  Dense coding in experimental quantum communication. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[66]  Carlton M. Caves,et al.  Subjective probability and quantum certainty , 2006 .

[67]  Alain Aspect,et al.  Quantum mechanics: To be or not to be local , 2007, Nature.

[68]  H. Everett "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics , 1957 .

[69]  D. Braddon-Mitchell NATURE'S CAPACITIES AND THEIR MEASUREMENT , 1991 .

[70]  Erik Curiel The Constraints General Relativity Places on Physicalist Accounts of Causality , 2000 .

[71]  F. London,et al.  La théorie de l'observation en mécanique quantique , 1939 .

[72]  R. Spekkens Evidence for the epistemic view of quantum states: A toy theory , 2004, quant-ph/0401052.

[73]  E. Wigner Remarks on the Mind-Body Question , 1995 .

[74]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Violation of Bell's Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions , 1998, quant-ph/9810080.

[75]  O. Penrose The Direction of Time , 1962 .

[76]  Jeffrey Bub,et al.  Quantum probabilities as degrees of belief , 2007 .

[77]  W. Myrvold On peaceful coexistence: is the collapse postulate incompatible with relativity? , 2002 .

[78]  Christopher R. Hitchcock,et al.  Salmon on Explanatory Relevance , 1995, Philosophy of Science.

[79]  J. Woodward,et al.  Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World , 1988 .

[80]  Phil Dowe,et al.  Causality and Conserved Quantities: A Reply to Salmon , 1995, Philosophy of Science.

[81]  C. Wright Representing and Intervening , 1985 .

[82]  K. Haller Quantum Electrodynamics , 1979, Nature.

[83]  M. Suárez Causal Inference in Quantum Mechanics: A Reassessment , 2007 .

[84]  Asher Peres,et al.  Quantum Theory Needs No ‘Interpretation’ , 2000 .

[85]  K. V. Meyenn Eine Entdeckung von ganz außerordentlicher Tragweite , 2011 .

[86]  B. Russell I.—On the Notion of Cause , 1913 .

[87]  Christopher G. Timpson,et al.  Quantum Bayesianism: A study , 2008, 0804.2047.

[88]  Rarity,et al.  Violation of Bell's inequality over 4 km of optical fiber. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[89]  Doreen Fraser,et al.  How to take particle physics seriously: A further defence of axiomatic quantum field theory , 2011 .

[90]  Shih,et al.  New type of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment using pairs of light quanta produced by optical parametric down conversion. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[91]  A. Einstein Physik und realität , 1936 .

[92]  D. Howard What Makes a Classical Concept Classical ? Toward a Reconstruction of Niels Bohr ' s Philosophy of Physics , 1986 .

[93]  R. Loidl,et al.  Violation of a Bell-like inequality in single-neutron interferometry , 2003, Nature.

[94]  H. S. Allen The Quantum Theory , 1928, Nature.

[95]  Philip Walther,et al.  Experimental entangled entanglement. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[96]  Arthur Fine,et al.  The shaky game , 1986 .

[97]  S. Saunders A Dissolution of the Problem of Locality , 1994, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[98]  James Henderson Classes of Copenhagen interpretations: Mechanisms of collapse as typologically determinative , 2010 .

[99]  The paradox of separated systems in quantum theory , 1950 .

[100]  Niels Bohr,et al.  Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature , 1934 .

[101]  C. Fuchs,et al.  Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities , 2001, quant-ph/0106133.

[102]  Simon Kochen,et al.  The Free Will Theorem , 2006 .

[103]  D. H. Mellor,et al.  On Raising the Chances of Effects , 1988 .

[104]  Rob Clifton,et al.  No Place for Particles in Relativistic Quantum Theories? , 2002, Philosophy of Science.

[105]  What's right and what's wrong with transference theories , 1995 .

[106]  Don Howard,et al.  “Nicht Sein Kann was Nicht Sein Darf,” or the Prehistory of EPR, 1909–1935: Einstein’s Early Worries about the Quantum Mechanics of Composite Systems , 1990 .

[107]  Adrian Heathcote A theory of causality: Causality=interaction (as defined by a suitable quantum field theory) , 1989 .

[108]  R. Tumulka Comment on “The Free Will Theorem” , 2006, quant-ph/0611283.

[109]  Julian Barbour,et al.  The End of Time: The Next Revolution in Physics , 2000 .

[110]  Phil Dowe,et al.  Wesley Salmon's Process Theory of Causality and the Conserved Quantity Theory , 1992, Philosophy of Science.

[111]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[112]  E. Schrödinger Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik , 2005, Naturwissenschaften.

[113]  Johanna Seibt,et al.  `Quanta,' Tropes, or Processes: Ontologies for QFT Beyond the Myth of Substance , 2002 .

[114]  D. Malament In Defense of Dogma: Why There Cannot be a Relativistic Quantum Mechanics of (Localizable) Particles , 1996 .

[115]  E. Wigner On Hidden Variables and Quantum Mechanical Probabilities , 1970 .

[116]  I. Pitowsky,et al.  Betting on the Outcomes of Measurements: A Bayesian Theory of Quantum Probability , 2002, quant-ph/0208121.

[117]  F. R. Rubia Vila [About creativity]. , 2019, Anales de la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina.

[118]  Boris M. Smirnov,et al.  Fullerenes and carbon structures , 1995 .

[119]  N. Gisin,et al.  Experimental test of nonlocal quantum correlation in relativistic configurations , 2000, quant-ph/0007009.

[120]  M. Egg Causal Warrant for Realism about Particle Physics , 2012, Journal for General Philosophy of Science.

[121]  M. Redhead Quantum theory and measurement , 1984 .

[122]  B G Sidharth,et al.  Law without Law , 2007, 0710.3900.

[123]  Shih,et al.  New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[124]  Measurement Dependence is not Conspiracy: A Common Cause Model of EPR Correlations , 2009 .

[125]  M. Strevens Scientific Explanation , 2005 .

[126]  Gershon Kurizki,et al.  Thermodynamic control by frequent quantum measurements , 2008, Nature.

[127]  Emergence of particles from bosonic quantum field theory , 2001, quant-ph/0112149.

[128]  Tim Maudlin,et al.  Quantum non-locality and relativity , 1994 .

[129]  Tracy Lupher A physical critique of physical causation , 2007, Synthese.

[130]  Zurek,et al.  Algorithmic randomness and physical entropy. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[131]  A. Wüthrich (How) Did Einstein Understand the EPR Paradox? , 2013 .

[132]  Jerrold L. Aronson,et al.  On the grammar of ‘cause’ , 1971, Synthese.

[133]  L. Broglie,et al.  Louis de Broglie, physicien et penseur , 1958 .

[134]  Gerd Grasshoff,et al.  Minimal Assumption Derivation of a Bell-type Inequality , 2005, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[135]  N. Mermin Copenhagen computation , 2003 .

[136]  Hans Halvorson,et al.  Algebraic Quantum Field Theory , 2006 .

[137]  Ou,et al.  Violation of Bell's inequality and classical probability in a two-photon correlation experiment. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[138]  Julian Barbour,et al.  The timelessness of quantum gravity: II. The appearance of dynamics in static configurations , 1994 .

[139]  Huw Price,et al.  Time's Arrow and Archimedes’ Point , 1997 .

[140]  J. Mackie,et al.  The cement of the universe : a study of causation , 1977 .

[141]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Experimental test of quantum nonlocality in three-photon Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement , 2000, Nature.

[142]  P. Stanford Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives , 2006 .

[143]  Vincent Lam Causation and space-time. , 2005, History and philosophy of the life sciences.

[144]  Doreen Fraser Quantum Field Theory: Underdetermination, Inconsistency, and Idealization* , 2009, Philosophy of Science.

[145]  N. Gisin,et al.  Violation of Bell Inequalities by Photons More Than 10 km Apart , 1998, quant-ph/9806043.

[146]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Higher-order quantum entanglement , 1992 .

[147]  J. Neumann Mathematische grundlagen der Quantenmechanik , 1935 .

[148]  Huw Price A Neglected Route to Realism about Quantum Mechanics , 1994 .

[149]  J. Bell BERTLMANN'S SOCKS AND THE NATURE OF REALITY , 1981 .

[150]  David Fair,et al.  Causation and the flow of energy , 1979 .

[151]  D. Howard Einstein on locality and separability , 1985 .

[152]  I. Hacking,et al.  Representing and Intervening. , 1986 .

[153]  Simon Friederich,et al.  How to spell out the epistemic conception of quantum states , 2011, 1101.1975.

[154]  R. J. Crewther,et al.  Introduction to quantum field theory , 1995, hep-th/9505152.

[155]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[156]  Paul Teller,et al.  An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory , 1994 .

[157]  N. Bohr II - Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[158]  Brigitte Falkenburg,et al.  Particle Metaphysics: A Critical Account of Subatomic Reality , 2007 .