OpenFlow over wireless networks: Performance analysis

Software Defined Networking (SDN) and OpenFlow represent the most commonly deployed approaches of the so called Programmable Networks. SDN is an emerging network architecture, which performs the subdivision of control plane and data plane and allows greater speed, greater scalability, and greater ductility in terms of routing and forwarding. OpenFlow, instead, is an SDN component that characterizes the communication between a controller and the devices within the SDN network. Although SDN and OpenFlow work efficiently in wired networks, the integration of these new paradigms over the wireless networks represents still and open issue. In fact, in a dense wireless scenario with an high number of base stations and a limited radio spectrum is still difficult to manage in a proper way operations such as radio spectrum allocation, interference management, handover management, and load balancing among the cells. In this paper, we present a performance analysis of the SDN and OpenFlow over wireless networks. The aim is to evaluate potential advantages introduced by the SDN architecture in terms of Quality of Service (QoS) metrics such as throughput, packet loss, end-to-end delay, and packet delivery ratio. An exhaustive simulation campaign has been conducted through the OMNeT++ network simulator framework by taking into account the new generation IP-based broadband wireless networks. The obtained results shown that the SDN architecture with OpenFlow introduces benefits in the network in term of resource management, transmission data-rate and end-to-end delay.

[1]  Chong-kwon Kim,et al.  A Flow-Based Hybrid Mechanism to Improve Performance in NOX and Wireless OpenFlow Switch Networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[2]  W. V. Wollman,et al.  Overview of open shortest path first, version 2 (OSPF V2) routing in the tactical environment , 1995, Proceedings of MILCOM '95.

[3]  Nick McKeown,et al.  OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks , 2008, CCRV.

[4]  M. Needham,et al.  Traffic and network modeling for next generation applications , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting.

[5]  Antonio Iera,et al.  Efficient Frequency Domain Packet scheduler for Point-to-Multipoint transmissions in LTE networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[6]  Nico Bayer,et al.  OpenFlow for Wireless Mesh Networks , 2011, 2011 Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN).

[7]  Vincenzo Mancuso,et al.  An SDN-Based Network Architecture for Extremely Dense Wireless Networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE SDN for Future Networks and Services (SDN4FNS).

[8]  Fabrizio Granelli,et al.  A QoE-Oriented Strategy for OFDMA Radio Resource Allocation Based on Min-MOS Maximization , 2011, IEEE Communications Letters.

[9]  Antonio Iera,et al.  On the impact of frequency selectivity on multicast subgroup formation in 4G networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB).

[10]  Igor Bisio,et al.  Opportunistic estimation of television audience through smartphones , 2012, 2012 International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Computer & Telecommunication Systems (SPECTS).

[11]  Jennifer Rexford,et al.  Toward Software-Defined Cellular Networks , 2012, 2012 European Workshop on Software Defined Networking.

[12]  Ramón Alcarria,et al.  Characterizing the multimedia service capacity of wireless mesh networks for rural communities , 2012, 2012 IEEE 8th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[13]  Antonio Iera,et al.  Optimizing point-to-multipoint transmissions in High Speed Packet Access networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB).