Angiographic Lesion Complexity Score and In-Hospital Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Objective We devised a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) scoring system based on angiographic lesion complexity and assessed its association with in-hospital complications. Background Although PCI is finding increasing application in patients with coronary artery disease, lesion complexity can lead to in-hospital complications. Methods Data from 3692 PCI patients were scored based on lesion complexity, defined by bifurcation, chronic total occlusion, type C, and left main lesion, along with acute thrombus in the presence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (1 point assigned for each variable). Results The patients’ mean age was 67.5 +/- 10.8 years; 79.8% were male. About half of the patients (50.3%) presented with an acute coronary syndrome, and 2218 (60.1%) underwent PCI for at least one complex lesion. The patients in the higher-risk score groups were older (p < 0.001) and had present or previous heart failure (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively). Higher-risk score groups had significantly higher in-hospital event rates for death, heart failure, and cardiogenic shock (from 0 to 4 risk score; 1.7%, 4.5%, 6.3%, 7.1%, 40%, p < 0.001); bleeding with a hemoglobin decrease of >3.0 g/dL (3.1%, 11.0%, 13.1%, 10.3%, 28.6%, p < 0.001); and postoperative myocardial infarction (1.5%, 3.1%, 3.8%, 3.8%, 10%, p = 0.004), respectively. The association with adverse outcomes persisted after adjustment for known clinical predictors (odds ratio 1.72, p < 0.001). Conclusion The complexity score was cumulatively associated with in-hospital mortality and complication rate and could be used for event prediction in PCI patients.

[1]  J. Messenger,et al.  Treatments, trends, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  M. Mack,et al.  Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax study. , 2009, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[3]  J. Ivanov,et al.  The Toronto score for in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions. , 2009, American heart journal.

[4]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  The SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) study: design, rationale, and run-in phase. , 2006, American heart journal.

[5]  Samin K. Sharma,et al.  A risk score to predict in-hospital mortality for percutaneous coronary interventions. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). , 2006, Circulation.

[7]  Joseph P Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[8]  P. Serruys,et al.  The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. , 2005, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[9]  W. Laskey,et al.  Relation of percutaneous coronary intervention of complex lesions to clinical outcomes (from the NHLBI Dynamic Registry). , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  Kirit Patel,et al.  Simple Bedside Additive Tool for Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions , 2001, Circulation.

[11]  L Ohno-Machado,et al.  Simplified risk score models accurately predict the risk of major in-hospital complications following percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  M. Bell,et al.  Prediction of death after percutaneous coronary interventional procedures. , 2000, American heart journal.

[13]  I. Palacios,et al.  Risk predictors in patients scheduled for percutaneous coronary revascularization. , 1998, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[14]  E L Hannan,et al.  Coronary angioplasty volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologists. , 1997, JAMA.

[15]  E. Topol,et al.  Analysis and comparison of operator-specific outcomes in interventional cardiology. From a multicenter database of 4860 quality-controlled procedures. , 1996, Circulation.

[16]  S. Kimmel,et al.  Development and validation of a simplified predictive index for major complications in contemporary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty practice , 1995 .

[17]  S. Kimmel,et al.  Development and validation of simplified predictive index for major complications in contemporary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty practice. The Registry Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  D. Pryor,et al.  The relation between the volume of coronary angioplasty procedures at hospitals treating Medicare beneficiaries and short-term mortality. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  E L Hannan,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in New York State. Risk factors and outcomes. , 1992, JAMA.