Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND Recent studies of surgery for cancer have demonstrated variations in outcomes among hospitals and among surgeons. We sought to examine variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. METHODS We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data base to evaluate health-related outcomes after radical prostatectomy. The rates of postoperative complications, late urinary complications (strictures or fistulas 31 to 365 days after the procedure), and long-term incontinence (more than 1 year after the procedure) were inferred from the Medicare claims records of 11,522 patients who underwent prostatectomy between 1992 and 1996. These rates were analyzed in relation to hospital volume and surgeon volume (the number of procedures performed at individual hospitals and by individual surgeons, respectively). RESULTS Neither hospital volume nor surgeon volume was significantly associated with surgery-related death. Significant trends in the relation between volume and outcome were observed with respect to postoperative complications and late urinary complications. Postoperative morbidity was lower in very-high-volume hospitals than in low-volume hospitals (27 percent vs. 32 percent, P=0.03) and was also lower when the prostatectomy was performed by very-high-volume surgeons than when it was performed by low-volume surgeons (26 percent vs. 32 percent, P<0.001). The rates of late urinary complications followed a similar pattern. Results for long-term preservation of continence were less clear-cut. In a detailed analysis of the 159 surgeons who had a high or very high volume of procedures, wide surgeon-to-surgeon variations in these clinical outcomes were observed, and they were much greater than would be predicted on the basis of chance or observed variations in the case mix. CONCLUSIONS In men undergoing prostatectomy, the rates of postoperative and late urinary complications are significantly reduced if the procedure is performed in a high-volume hospital and by a surgeon who performs a high number of such procedures.

[1]  R A Stephenson,et al.  Health outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  P. Davidson,et al.  Radical prostatectomy: prospective assessment of mortality and morbidity. , 1996, European urology.

[3]  C. Begg,et al.  Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. , 2000, JAMA.

[4]  M. Kattan,et al.  Risk factors for complications and morbidity after radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[5]  Joseph V. Simone,et al.  Ensuring Quality Cancer Care , 1999 .

[6]  A Milstein,et al.  Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. , 2000, JAMA.

[7]  Andrea Erickson Best,et al.  Secondary Data Bases and Their Use in Outcomes Research: A Review of the Area Resource File and the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project , 1999, Journal of Medical Systems.

[8]  C. Begg,et al.  impact of Hospital Volume on Operative Mortality for Major Cancer Surgery , 1999 .

[9]  P. Hermanek,et al.  The importance of volume in colorectal cancer surgery. , 1996, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[10]  Colin B Begg,et al.  Measuring Complications of Cancer Treatment Using the SEER-Medicare Data , 2002, Medical care.

[11]  J. Oesterling,et al.  Have complication rates decreased after treatment for localized prostate cancer? , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[12]  M. Brennan,et al.  Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. , 1993 .

[13]  C. Begg,et al.  The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  L. Kessler,et al.  Potential for Cancer Related Health Services Research Using a Linked Medicare‐Tumor Registry Database , 1993, Medical care.

[15]  J. Tielsch,et al.  The Effects of Regionalization on Cost and Outcome for One General High‐Risk Surgical Procedure , 1995, Annals of surgery.

[16]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  The effect of hospital volume on mortality and resource use after radical prostatectomy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[17]  J L Warren,et al.  Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  H. Heinzer,et al.  Early complication of anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: lessons from a single-center experience. , 1997, Urologia internationalis.

[19]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Logistic Regression Using the SAS System : Theory and Application , 1999 .

[20]  H. Anton-Culver,et al.  Treatment differences and other prognostic factors related to breast cancer survival. Delivery systems and medical outcomes. , 1994, JAMA.

[21]  R A Stephenson,et al.  Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. , 2000, JAMA.

[22]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Relationship between hospital volume and late survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy. , 1999, Surgery.

[23]  S. Yao,et al.  Population-based study of relationships between hospital volume of prostatectomies, patient outcomes, and length of hospital stay. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[24]  N. Bickell,et al.  Hospital volume differences and five-year survival from breast cancer. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[25]  L I Iezzoni,et al.  Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid? , 2000, Medical care.

[26]  W. Catalona,et al.  Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[27]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative. , 2001, Surgery.

[28]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer. , 1996, The Western journal of medicine.

[29]  C. Mettlin.  The American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project and National patterns of prostate cancer detection and treatment , 1997, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[30]  J. Jollis,et al.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[31]  N. Scott,et al.  Influence of volume of work on the outcome of treatment for patients with colorectal cancer , 1999, The British journal of surgery.

[32]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[33]  J. Cohen,et al.  Complications after radical retropubic prostatectomy in the medicare population. , 2000, Urology.

[34]  B. Hillner,et al.  Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.