Prostate-specific antigen kinetics during follow-up are an unreliable trigger for intervention in a prostate cancer surveillance program.

PURPOSE To assess the predictive ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity (PSAV) and doubling time (PSADT) for biopsy progression and adverse pathology at prostatectomy among men with low-risk prostate cancer enrolled on an active-surveillance program. METHODS We evaluated 290 men who met criteria for active surveillance (ie, PSA density < 0.15 ng/mL/cm(3) and Gleason score < or = 6 with no pattern > or = 4, involving < or = 2 cores with cancer, and < or = 50% involvement of any core by cancer) with two or more serial PSA measurements after diagnosis from 1994 to 2008. Follow-up included twice-yearly digital rectal exam and PSA measurements and yearly surveillance biopsy. Treatment was recommended for biopsy progression (ie, Gleason score > or = 7, or > 2 positive cores, or > 50% core involvement). Sensitivity and specificity of postdiagnostic PSAV and PSADT were explored by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS Overall, 188 (65%) men remained on active surveillance, and 102 (35%) developed biopsy progression at a median follow-up of 2.9 years. PSADT was not significantly associated with subsequent adverse biopsy findings (P = .83), and PSAV was marginally significant (P = .06). No PSAV or PSADT cut point had both high sensitivity and specificity (area under the curve, 0.61 and 0.59, respectively) for biopsy progression. In those who eventually underwent radical prostatectomy, PSAV (P = .79) and PSADT (P = .87) were not associated with the presence of unfavorable surgical pathology. CONCLUSION Postdiagnostic PSA kinetics do not reliably predict adverse pathology and should not be used to replace annual surveillance biopsy for monitoring men on active surveillance.

[1]  M Emberton,et al.  Focal therapy in prostate cancer-report from a consensus panel. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[2]  K. Fujita,et al.  Serial prostate biopsies are associated with an increased risk of erectile dysfunction in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[3]  Andrew J Vickers,et al.  Prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy for patients treated in the prostate-specific antigen era. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Michael Seitz,et al.  Insignificant prostate cancer and active surveillance: from definition to clinical implications. , 2009, European urology.

[5]  D. Dearnaley,et al.  Prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) kinetics in untreated, localized prostate cancer: PSA velocity vs PSA doubling time , 2009, BJU international.

[6]  A. D'Amico,et al.  PSA velocity is associated with gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimen: marker for prostate cancer aggressiveness. , 2008, Urology.

[7]  L. Bégin,et al.  Role of repeated biopsy of the prostate in predicting disease progression in patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance , 2008, Cancer.

[8]  A. Haese*,et al.  Critical assessment of tools to predict clinically insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy in contemporary men , 2008, Cancer.

[9]  E. Metter,et al.  Expectant management of prostate cancer with curative intent: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[10]  Steve Williams,et al.  Active surveillance; a reasonable management alternative for patients with prostate cancer: the Miami experience , 2007, BJU international.

[11]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  Detection of life-threatening prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen velocity during a window of curability. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  B. Trock,et al.  Delayed versus immediate surgical intervention and prostate cancer outcome. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  L. Klotz Active surveillance for prostate cancer: for whom? , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Alan W Partin,et al.  Characteristics of insignificant clinical T1c prostate tumors , 2004, Cancer.

[15]  Ming-Hui Chen,et al.  Preoperative PSA velocity and the risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  T. Stamey Editorial: More Information on Prostate Specific Antigen and Prostate Cancer , 2003 .

[17]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  Steven Piantadosi,et al.  Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[19]  L. Bégin,et al.  Utility of PSA doubling time in follow-up of untreated patients with localized prostate cancer. , 2002, Urology.

[20]  M Bolla,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. , 2001, European urology.

[21]  T. Stamey,et al.  Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[22]  J. J. de la Rosette,et al.  Histopathological changes associated with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for localised adenocarcinoma of the prostate , 2000, Journal of clinical pathology.

[23]  D. Chan,et al.  Recommended prostate-specific antigen testing intervals for the detection of curable prostate cancer. , 1997, JAMA.

[24]  P. Walsh,et al.  Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. , 1994, JAMA.

[25]  A S Whittemore,et al.  Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer , 1993, Cancer.

[26]  D. Chan,et al.  Estimation of prostatic growth using serial prostate-specific antigen measurements in men with and without prostate disease. , 1992, Cancer research.

[27]  Liying Zhang,et al.  Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  T. Tammela,et al.  Outcomes of men with screen-detected prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance who were managed expectantly. , 2009, European urology.