Multiple intracranial aneurysms: a direct hemodynamic comparison between ruptured and unruptured vessel malformations

PurposeDespite numerous studies addressing the rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms that have been published, the assessment thereof still remains challenging. Image-based simulations enable a precise prediction of patient-specific blood flow information. However, those approaches normally consider only small segments of the complete cerebral vasculature.MethodsTo test the validity of the consideration of single aneurysms in one computational setup, domains of the complete anterior and posterior circulations with multiple intracranial aneurysms (MIA) were simulated. Six patients with MIA were investigated, while 3D surfaces of eleven unruptured and six ruptured aneurysms were segmented. The segmentations were used for the determination of morphological parameters and also for image-based blood flow simulations used to characterize the hemodynamic properties of each aneurysm.ResultsIn the geometric comparison, neck aspect ratios of unruptured and ruptured aneurysms did not differ significantly. In contrast, size ratios, aspect ratios, surface areas, volumes, and non-sphericity indices were significantly higher in the ruptured cases. The analysis of hemodynamic parameters demonstrated that in each patient, the ruptured aneurysm exhibited the lowest averaged wall shear stresses and highest oscillatory shears. Unstable flow was also detected in ruptured aneurysms based on increased oscillatory velocity.ConclusionIn this small study involving patients with MIA, different morphologies and flow patterns were observed between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. The analysis of the hemodynamics in such patients revealed a good agreement with studies that only considered single malformations. Additionally, complex flow patterns are detected in ruptured cases, which require deeper investigation.

[1]  Show-Ling Jang,et al.  Size and location of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. , 2009, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[2]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Analysis of Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms with Different Outcomes in the Same Patient After Endovascular Treatment. , 2016, World neurosurgery.

[3]  J. Xiang,et al.  High WSS or Low WSS? Complex Interactions of Hemodynamics with Intracranial Aneurysm Initiation, Growth, and Rupture: Toward a Unifying Hypothesis , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[4]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  Recommendations for accurate numerical blood flow simulations of stented intracranial aneurysms , 2013, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[5]  G. Janiga,et al.  Hemodynamics in Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms: The Role of Shear Related to Rupture , 2013, BIOINFORMATICS 2013.

[6]  A. Siddiqui,et al.  Risk Factors for Ischemic Complications following Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Results from the IntrePED Study , 2016, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[7]  J. Ulatowski,et al.  Risk factors for multiple intracranial aneurysms. , 1998, Neurosurgery.

[8]  L. Jou,et al.  Wall Shear Stress on Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms at the Internal Carotid Artery , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[9]  J. Hennig,et al.  Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: Optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  C M Putman,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms: effects of parent artery segmentation on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  S. Juvela,et al.  Risk factors for multiple intracranial aneurysms. , 2000, Stroke.

[12]  G. Janiga,et al.  Cerebral blood flow in a healthy Circle of Willis and two intracranial aneurysms: computational fluid dynamics versus four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. , 2014, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  N. Sourour,et al.  Intracranial aneurysms: an overview. , 2006, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[14]  M. Sluzewski,et al.  Procedural complications of coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: incidence and risk factors in a consecutive series of 681 patients. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[15]  H Meng,et al.  CFD: Computational Fluid Dynamics or Confounding Factor Dissemination? The Role of Hemodynamics in Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture Risk Assessment , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[16]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  Cluster Analysis of Vortical Flow in Simulations of Cerebral Aneurysm Hemodynamics , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[17]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  From imaging to hemodynamics – how reconstruction kernels influence the blood flow predictions in intracranial aneurysms , 2016 .

[18]  D. Kallmes,et al.  Counterpoint: Realizing the Clinical Utility of Computational Fluid Dynamics—Closing the Gap , 2012 .

[19]  J. Mocco,et al.  Hemodynamic–Morphologic Discriminants for Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture , 2011, Stroke.

[20]  Bongjae Chung,et al.  CFD for Evaluation and Treatment Planning of Aneurysms: Review of Proposed Clinical Uses and Their Challenges , 2014, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Fujimaro Ishida,et al.  Low Wall Shear Stress Is Independently Associated With the Rupture Status of Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms , 2013, Stroke.

[22]  C. You,et al.  Patients with Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms Presenting Initial Worse Clinical Condition as a Result of a Ruptured Aneurysm. , 2016, World neurosurgery.

[23]  S Saalfeld,et al.  Does the DSA reconstruction kernel affect hemodynamic predictions in intracranial aneurysms? An analysis of geometry and blood flow variations , 2017, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[24]  J. Østergaard,et al.  Incidence of multiple intracranial aneurysms. Influence of arterial hypertension and gender. , 1985, Journal of neurosurgery.

[25]  R. Spetzler,et al.  Multiple intracranial aneurysms: determining the site of rupture. , 1985, Journal of neurosurgery.

[26]  Kai Lawonn,et al.  AmniVis – A System for Qualitative Exploration of Near‐Wall Hemodynamics in Cerebral Aneurysms , 2013, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[27]  R. Tubbs,et al.  Associations of Endothelin Polymorphisms and Aneurysm Size at Time of Rupture. , 2017, World neurosurgery.

[28]  David A Steinman,et al.  The Computational Fluid Dynamics Rupture Challenge 2013--Phase II: Variability of Hemodynamic Simulations in Two Intracranial Aneurysms. , 2015, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[29]  T. Inagawa Multiple intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[30]  S. Sherwin,et al.  Modelling the circle of Willis to assess the effects of anatomical variations and occlusions on cerebral flows. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  D F Kallmes,et al.  Point: CFD—Computational Fluid Dynamics or Confounding Factor Dissemination , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[32]  F. Mut,et al.  Association of Hemodynamic Characteristics and Cerebral Aneurysm Rupture , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[33]  C. Ogilvy,et al.  In Reply to "Patients with Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms Presenting Initial Worse Clinical Condition as a Result of a Ruptured Aneurysm". , 2016, World neurosurgery.

[34]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  Fluid-Structure Simulations of a Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: Constant versus Patient-Specific Wall Thickness , 2016, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[35]  Fujimaro Ishida,et al.  Hemodynamic Differences Between Ruptured and Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms Simultaneously Existing in the Same Location: 2 Case Reports and Proposal of a Novel Parameter Oscillatory Velocity Index. , 2017, World neurosurgery.

[36]  Meihua Li,et al.  Size Ratio: A Morphological Factor Predictive of the Rupture of Cerebral Aneurysm? , 2013, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[37]  J. Mocco,et al.  MORPHOLOGY PARAMETERS FOR INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM RUPTURE RISK ASSESSMENT , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[38]  D A Steinman,et al.  The Computational Fluid Dynamics Rupture Challenge 2013—Phase I: Prediction of Rupture Status in Intracranial Aneurysms , 2015, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[39]  H. Jäger,et al.  Risk factors for the formation of multiple intracranial aneurysms. , 2001, Journal of neurosurgery.