Functional responses in polar bear habitat selection

Habitat selection may occur in situations in which animals experience a trade-off, e.g. between the use of habitats with abundant forage and the use of safer retreat habitats with little forage. Such trade-offs may yield relative habitat use conditional on the relative availability of the different habitat types, as proportional use of foraging habitat may exceed proportional availability when foraging habitat is scarce, but be less than availability when foraging habitat is abundant. Hence, trade-offs in habitat use may result in functional responses in habitat use (i.e. change in relative use with changing availability). We used logistic and log-linear models to model functional responses in female polar bear habitat use based on satellite telemetry data from two contiguous populations; one near shore inhabiting sea ice within fjords, and one inhabiting pelagic drift ice. Open ice, near the ice edge, is a highly dynamic habitat hypothesised to be important polar bear habitat due to high prey availability. In open ice-polar bears may experience a high energetic cost of movements and risk drifting away from the main ice field (i.e. trade off between feeding and energy saving or safety). If polar bears were constrained by ice dynamics we therefore predicted use of retreat habitats with greater ice coverage relative to habitats used for hunting. The polar bears demonstrated season and population specific functional responses in habitat use, likely reflecting seasonal and regional variation in use of retreat and foraging habitats. We suggest that in seasons with functional responses in habitat use, polar bear space use and population distribution may not be a mere reflection of prey availability but rather reflect the alternate allocation of time in hunting and retreat habitats.

[1]  E. Hansen,et al.  Using satellite telemetry to define spatial population structure in polar bears in the Norwegian and western Russian Arctic , 2002 .

[2]  S. Amstrup,et al.  Polar bear maternity denning in the Beaufort Sea , 1994 .

[3]  Odd Lønø The Polar bear (Ursus maritimus Phipps) in the Svalbard area , 1970 .

[4]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Assessing habitat selection when availability changes , 1996 .

[5]  E. Sakshaug Biomass and productivity distributions and their variability in the Barents Sea , 1997 .

[6]  Douglas H. Johnson THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[7]  M. Kingsley,et al.  The Distribution and Abundance of Seals in the Canadian High Arctic, 1980–82 , 1985 .

[8]  Dag Ø. Hjermann,et al.  Analyzing habitat selection in animals without well-defined home ranges , 2000 .

[9]  Nicholas J. Aebischer,et al.  Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio-Tracking Data , 1993 .

[10]  T. G. Smith,et al.  Availability of suitable land‐fast ice and predation as factors limiting ringed seal populations, Phoca hispida, in Svalbard , 1991 .

[11]  Carl H. Key,et al.  Satellite telemetry: performance of animal-tracking systems , 1991 .

[12]  M. Boyce,et al.  Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  F. Messier,et al.  Seasonal activity patterns of female polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the Canadian Arctic as revealed by satellite telemetry , 1992 .

[14]  H. G. Andrewartha,et al.  The distribution and abundance of animals. , 1954 .

[15]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Resource Selection by Animals , 1993, Springer Netherlands.

[16]  Jean Thioulouse,et al.  ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software , 1997, Stat. Comput..

[17]  G. Banco,et al.  Principal Component and Correspondence Analyses with Respect to Instrumental Variables : An Overview of Their Role in Studies of Structure - Activity and Species - Environment Relationships , 1991 .

[18]  I. Stirling,et al.  Relationships between estimates of ringed seal (Phoca hispida) and polar bear (Ursus maritimus) populations in the Canadian Arctic , 1995 .

[19]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Titrating food and safety in a heterogeneous environment: when are the risky and safe patches of equal value? , 1995 .

[20]  Christian Lydersen,et al.  Polar bear predation on ringed seals in the fast-ice of Hornsund, Svalbard , 1986 .

[21]  K. Kovacs,et al.  Characteristics of ringed seal, Phoca hispida, subnivean structures and breeding habitat and their effects on predation , 1996 .

[22]  Jörg Haarpaintner,et al.  Ice production and brine formation in Storfjorden, Svalbard , 2001 .

[23]  C. Tang,et al.  Response of sea ice drift to wind forcing on the northeastern Newfoundland Shelf , 1991 .

[24]  N. Øien,et al.  Seasonal distribution of harp seals (Phoca groenlandica) in the Barents Sea , 1994 .

[25]  J. Haarpaintner The Storfjorden polynya: ERS-2 SAR observations and overview , 1999 .

[26]  Calyampudi R. Rao The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research , 1964 .

[27]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  The effect of barn owls (Tyto alba) on the activity and microhabitat selection of Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum , 1996, Oecologia.

[28]  J. Wiens Population Responses to Patchy Environments , 1976 .

[29]  James F. Wittenberger,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Scales in Habitat Selection , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[30]  T. Vinje,et al.  Barents Sea drift ice characteristics , 1991 .

[31]  L. Stempniewicz The polar bear Ursus maritimus feeding in a seabird colony in Frans Josef Land , 1993 .

[32]  R. Levins Evolution in Changing Environments , 1968 .

[33]  Atle Mysterud,et al.  FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES IN HABITAT USE: AVAILABILITY INFLUENCES RELATIVE USE IN TRADE-OFF SITUATIONS , 1998 .

[34]  Anne Lohrli Chapman and Hall , 1985 .

[35]  Atle Mysterud,et al.  Habitat selection by roe deer and sheep: does habitat ranking reflect resource availability? , 1999 .

[36]  Ian Stirling,et al.  Habitat preferences of polar bears in the western Canadian Arctic in late winter and spring , 1993, Polar Record.

[37]  Ø. Wiig,et al.  RINGED SEAL (PHOCA HISPIDA) BREEDING IN THE DRIFTING PACK ICE OF THE BARENTS SEA , 1999 .

[38]  Christian Lydersen,et al.  Birth-Site Characteristics and Prenatal Molting in Bearded Seals (Erignathus barbatus) , 1996 .

[39]  Ø. Wiig,et al.  Movements and diving of adult ringed seals (Phoca hispida) in Svalbard , 2000, Polar Biology.

[40]  Ø. Wiig,et al.  Predation of Svalbard reindeer by polar bears , 2000, Polar Biology.

[41]  F. Messier,et al.  INFLUENCE OF SEA ICE DYNAMICS ON HABITAT SELECTION BY POLAR BEARS , 2000 .

[42]  Ø. Wiig,et al.  Movements and diving of bearded seal (Erignathus barbatus) mothers and pups during lactation and post-weaning , 2000, Polar Biology.

[43]  T. G. Smith Polar bear predation of ringed and bearded seals in the land-fast sea ice habitat , 1980 .

[44]  O. Wiig Distribution of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the Svalbard area , 1995 .

[45]  S. Ferguson,et al.  Space use by polar bears in and around Auyuittuq National Park, Northwest Territories, during the ice-free period , 1997 .

[46]  I. Stirling,et al.  Reproductive biology and ecology of female polar bears (Ursus maritimus) , 1988 .

[47]  I. Stirling,et al.  Aspects of Predation of Seals by Polar Bears , 1977 .

[48]  Ø. Whg Distribution of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the Svalbard area , 1995 .

[49]  F. Messier,et al.  Denning Ecology of Polar Bears in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago , 1994 .

[50]  Andrew E. Derocher,et al.  Space-use strategies of female polar bears in a dynamic sea ice habitat , 2001 .

[51]  J. B. Ørbæk,et al.  Physical and ecological processes in the marginal ice zone of the northern Barents Sea during the summer melt period , 2000 .

[52]  J. R. Alldredge,et al.  Comparison of some statistical techniques for analysis of resource selection , 1986 .

[53]  I. Stirling,et al.  IMMOBILIZATION OF POLAR BEARS (URSUS MARITIMUS) WITH TELAZOL® IN THE CANADIAN ARCTIC , 1989, Journal of wildlife diseases.